你的Verilog RTL代码有多好?来自机器学习的快速回答

Prianka Sengupta, Aakash Tyagi, Yiran Chen, Jiangkun Hu
{"title":"你的Verilog RTL代码有多好?来自机器学习的快速回答","authors":"Prianka Sengupta, Aakash Tyagi, Yiran Chen, Jiangkun Hu","doi":"10.1145/3508352.3549375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hardware Description Language (HDL) is a common entry point for designing digital circuits. Differences in HDL coding styles and design choices may lead to considerably different design quality and performance-power tradeoff. In general, the impact of HDL coding is not clear until logic synthesis or even layout is completed. However, running synthesis merely as a feedback for HDL code is computationally not economical especially in early design phases when the code needs to be frequently modified. Furthermore, in late stages of design convergence burdened with high-impact engineering change orders (ECO’s), design iterations become prohibitively expensive. To this end, we propose a machine learning approach to Verilog-based Register-Transfer Level (RTL) design assessment without going through the synthesis process. It would allow designers to quickly evaluate the performance-power tradeoff among different options of RTL designs. Experimental results show that our proposed technique achieves an average of 95% prediction accuracy in terms of post-placement analysis, and is 6 orders of magnitude faster than evaluation by running logic synthesis and placement.","PeriodicalId":270592,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE/ACM International Conference On Computer Aided Design (ICCAD)","volume":"549 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Good Is Your Verilog RTL Code? A Quick Answer from Machine Learning\",\"authors\":\"Prianka Sengupta, Aakash Tyagi, Yiran Chen, Jiangkun Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3508352.3549375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hardware Description Language (HDL) is a common entry point for designing digital circuits. Differences in HDL coding styles and design choices may lead to considerably different design quality and performance-power tradeoff. In general, the impact of HDL coding is not clear until logic synthesis or even layout is completed. However, running synthesis merely as a feedback for HDL code is computationally not economical especially in early design phases when the code needs to be frequently modified. Furthermore, in late stages of design convergence burdened with high-impact engineering change orders (ECO’s), design iterations become prohibitively expensive. To this end, we propose a machine learning approach to Verilog-based Register-Transfer Level (RTL) design assessment without going through the synthesis process. It would allow designers to quickly evaluate the performance-power tradeoff among different options of RTL designs. Experimental results show that our proposed technique achieves an average of 95% prediction accuracy in terms of post-placement analysis, and is 6 orders of magnitude faster than evaluation by running logic synthesis and placement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":270592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE/ACM International Conference On Computer Aided Design (ICCAD)\",\"volume\":\"549 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE/ACM International Conference On Computer Aided Design (ICCAD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3508352.3549375\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE/ACM International Conference On Computer Aided Design (ICCAD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3508352.3549375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

硬件描述语言(HDL)是设计数字电路的通用入口。HDL编码风格和设计选择的差异可能导致相当不同的设计质量和性能-功率权衡。一般来说,直到逻辑合成甚至布局完成后,HDL编码的影响才会清楚。然而,运行综合仅仅作为对HDL代码的反馈在计算上是不经济的,特别是在需要频繁修改代码的早期设计阶段。此外,在设计融合的后期阶段,由于高影响的工程变更订单(ECO),设计迭代变得非常昂贵。为此,我们提出了一种机器学习方法来进行基于verilog的Register-Transfer Level (RTL)设计评估,而无需经过合成过程。它将允许设计师快速评估不同RTL设计选项之间的性能-功率权衡。实验结果表明,我们提出的方法在放置后分析方面的预测准确率平均达到95%,比运行逻辑综合和放置的评估快6个数量级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Good Is Your Verilog RTL Code? A Quick Answer from Machine Learning
Hardware Description Language (HDL) is a common entry point for designing digital circuits. Differences in HDL coding styles and design choices may lead to considerably different design quality and performance-power tradeoff. In general, the impact of HDL coding is not clear until logic synthesis or even layout is completed. However, running synthesis merely as a feedback for HDL code is computationally not economical especially in early design phases when the code needs to be frequently modified. Furthermore, in late stages of design convergence burdened with high-impact engineering change orders (ECO’s), design iterations become prohibitively expensive. To this end, we propose a machine learning approach to Verilog-based Register-Transfer Level (RTL) design assessment without going through the synthesis process. It would allow designers to quickly evaluate the performance-power tradeoff among different options of RTL designs. Experimental results show that our proposed technique achieves an average of 95% prediction accuracy in terms of post-placement analysis, and is 6 orders of magnitude faster than evaluation by running logic synthesis and placement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信