自动驾驶边缘AI算法的偏差检测与泛化

Dewant Katare, N. Kourtellis, Souneil Park, Diego Perino, M. Janssen, A. Ding
{"title":"自动驾驶边缘AI算法的偏差检测与泛化","authors":"Dewant Katare, N. Kourtellis, Souneil Park, Diego Perino, M. Janssen, A. Ding","doi":"10.1109/SEC54971.2022.00050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A machine learning model can often produce biased outputs for a familiar group or similar sets of classes during inference over an unknown dataset. The generalization of neural networks have been studied to resolve biases, which has also shown improvement in accuracy and performance metrics, such as precision and recall, and refining the dataset's validation set. Data distribution and instances included in test and validation-set play a significant role in improving the generalization of neural networks. For producing an unbiased AI model, it should not only be trained to achieve high accuracy and minimize false positives. The goal should be to prevent the dominance of one class/feature over the other class/feature while calculating weights. This paper investigates state-of-art object detection/classification on AI models using metrics such as selectivity score and cosine similarity. We focus on perception tasks for vehicular edge scenarios, which generally include collaborative tasks and model updates based on weights. The analysis is performed using cases that include the difference in data diversity, the viewpoint of the input class and combinations. Our results show the potential of using cosine similarity, selectivity score and invariance for measuring the training bias, which sheds light on developing unbiased AI models for future vehicular edge services.","PeriodicalId":364062,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE/ACM 7th Symposium on Edge Computing (SEC)","volume":"56 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bias Detection and Generalization in AI Algorithms on Edge for Autonomous Driving\",\"authors\":\"Dewant Katare, N. Kourtellis, Souneil Park, Diego Perino, M. Janssen, A. Ding\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SEC54971.2022.00050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A machine learning model can often produce biased outputs for a familiar group or similar sets of classes during inference over an unknown dataset. The generalization of neural networks have been studied to resolve biases, which has also shown improvement in accuracy and performance metrics, such as precision and recall, and refining the dataset's validation set. Data distribution and instances included in test and validation-set play a significant role in improving the generalization of neural networks. For producing an unbiased AI model, it should not only be trained to achieve high accuracy and minimize false positives. The goal should be to prevent the dominance of one class/feature over the other class/feature while calculating weights. This paper investigates state-of-art object detection/classification on AI models using metrics such as selectivity score and cosine similarity. We focus on perception tasks for vehicular edge scenarios, which generally include collaborative tasks and model updates based on weights. The analysis is performed using cases that include the difference in data diversity, the viewpoint of the input class and combinations. Our results show the potential of using cosine similarity, selectivity score and invariance for measuring the training bias, which sheds light on developing unbiased AI models for future vehicular edge services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":364062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE/ACM 7th Symposium on Edge Computing (SEC)\",\"volume\":\"56 5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE/ACM 7th Symposium on Edge Computing (SEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEC54971.2022.00050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE/ACM 7th Symposium on Edge Computing (SEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEC54971.2022.00050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在对未知数据集进行推理时,机器学习模型通常会为熟悉的组或相似的类集产生有偏差的输出。已经研究了神经网络的泛化来解决偏差,这也显示出准确性和性能指标的改善,例如精度和召回率,以及改进数据集的验证集。测试和验证集中包含的数据分布和实例对提高神经网络的泛化能力起着重要的作用。为了产生一个无偏的人工智能模型,不仅要训练它达到高精度并最大限度地减少误报。目标应该是在计算权重时防止一个类/特征优于另一个类/特征。本文使用选择性评分和余弦相似度等指标研究了人工智能模型上最先进的对象检测/分类。我们专注于车辆边缘场景的感知任务,通常包括协作任务和基于权重的模型更新。使用包括数据多样性差异、输入类的视点和组合的用例执行分析。我们的研究结果显示了使用余弦相似性、选择性分数和不变性来测量训练偏差的潜力,这为未来车辆边缘服务开发无偏AI模型提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bias Detection and Generalization in AI Algorithms on Edge for Autonomous Driving
A machine learning model can often produce biased outputs for a familiar group or similar sets of classes during inference over an unknown dataset. The generalization of neural networks have been studied to resolve biases, which has also shown improvement in accuracy and performance metrics, such as precision and recall, and refining the dataset's validation set. Data distribution and instances included in test and validation-set play a significant role in improving the generalization of neural networks. For producing an unbiased AI model, it should not only be trained to achieve high accuracy and minimize false positives. The goal should be to prevent the dominance of one class/feature over the other class/feature while calculating weights. This paper investigates state-of-art object detection/classification on AI models using metrics such as selectivity score and cosine similarity. We focus on perception tasks for vehicular edge scenarios, which generally include collaborative tasks and model updates based on weights. The analysis is performed using cases that include the difference in data diversity, the viewpoint of the input class and combinations. Our results show the potential of using cosine similarity, selectivity score and invariance for measuring the training bias, which sheds light on developing unbiased AI models for future vehicular edge services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信