{"title":"消息传递系统中的有限状态自稳定协议","authors":"Rodney R. Howell, Mikhail Nesterenko, M. Mizuno","doi":"10.1109/SLFSTB.1999.777488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We define a finite state message passing model using guarded commands. This model is particularly appropriate for defining and reasoning about self stabilizing protocols, due to the well known result that self stabilizing protocols on unbounded-channel models must have infinitely many legitimate states. We argue that our model is more realistic than other models, and demonstrate its use with a simple example. We conclude by discussing how self stabilizing protocols defined on this model might be implemented directly on actual networks.","PeriodicalId":395768,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 19th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems","volume":"26 7-8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finite-state self-stabilizing protocols in message-passing systems\",\"authors\":\"Rodney R. Howell, Mikhail Nesterenko, M. Mizuno\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SLFSTB.1999.777488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We define a finite state message passing model using guarded commands. This model is particularly appropriate for defining and reasoning about self stabilizing protocols, due to the well known result that self stabilizing protocols on unbounded-channel models must have infinitely many legitimate states. We argue that our model is more realistic than other models, and demonstrate its use with a simple example. We conclude by discussing how self stabilizing protocols defined on this model might be implemented directly on actual networks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":395768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 19th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems\",\"volume\":\"26 7-8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 19th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SLFSTB.1999.777488\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 19th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SLFSTB.1999.777488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Finite-state self-stabilizing protocols in message-passing systems
We define a finite state message passing model using guarded commands. This model is particularly appropriate for defining and reasoning about self stabilizing protocols, due to the well known result that self stabilizing protocols on unbounded-channel models must have infinitely many legitimate states. We argue that our model is more realistic than other models, and demonstrate its use with a simple example. We conclude by discussing how self stabilizing protocols defined on this model might be implemented directly on actual networks.