心理学与音乐

D. Deutsch
{"title":"心理学与音乐","authors":"D. Deutsch","doi":"10.4324/9781315781808-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between psychology and music is characteristic of that between a new science and an established discipline. Western music theory has a very old tradition, dating at least from the time of Pythagoras; and the philosophical underpinnings of this tradition that were established in ancient times still exist today. Most characteristic of this tradition is its rationalism. In contrast with the scientific disciplines, the development of music theory over the last few hundred years has not been characterized by a growth in the empirical method. Rather, while composers have constantly experimented with new means of expression, music theorists have on the whole been system builders who sought to justify existing compositional practice or to prescribe new practice on numerological grounds. Further, when an external principle has been invoked as an explanatory device, most commonly such a principle was taken from physics. The concept of music as essentially the product of our processing mechanisms and therefore related to psychology has only rarely been entertained. There are several reasons why this rationalistic stance was adopted, most of which no longer apply. One reason was a paucity of knowledge concerning the nature of sound. It is understandable that the inability to characterize a physical stimulus should have inhibited the development of theories concerning how this stimulus is processed. A related reason was poor stimulus control, which made experimentation difficult. A third reason was the lack of appropriate mathematical techniques with which to study probabilistic phenomena. However, another reason, which is still with us today, lies in the peculiar nature of music itself. There are no external criteria for distinguishing between music and nonmusic, or between good music and bad music. Further, it is clear that how we perceive music depends at least to some extent on prior experience. Thus the relevance of psychological experimentation to music theory requires careful definition. In this chapter I first review major developments in music theory from an historical point of view. Following this I explore various issues that are currently being studied both by music theorists and by psychologists. Finally, I discuss the role of psychology in music theory.","PeriodicalId":212468,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and its Allied Disciplines","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychology and Music\",\"authors\":\"D. Deutsch\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315781808-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The relationship between psychology and music is characteristic of that between a new science and an established discipline. Western music theory has a very old tradition, dating at least from the time of Pythagoras; and the philosophical underpinnings of this tradition that were established in ancient times still exist today. Most characteristic of this tradition is its rationalism. In contrast with the scientific disciplines, the development of music theory over the last few hundred years has not been characterized by a growth in the empirical method. Rather, while composers have constantly experimented with new means of expression, music theorists have on the whole been system builders who sought to justify existing compositional practice or to prescribe new practice on numerological grounds. Further, when an external principle has been invoked as an explanatory device, most commonly such a principle was taken from physics. The concept of music as essentially the product of our processing mechanisms and therefore related to psychology has only rarely been entertained. There are several reasons why this rationalistic stance was adopted, most of which no longer apply. One reason was a paucity of knowledge concerning the nature of sound. It is understandable that the inability to characterize a physical stimulus should have inhibited the development of theories concerning how this stimulus is processed. A related reason was poor stimulus control, which made experimentation difficult. A third reason was the lack of appropriate mathematical techniques with which to study probabilistic phenomena. However, another reason, which is still with us today, lies in the peculiar nature of music itself. There are no external criteria for distinguishing between music and nonmusic, or between good music and bad music. Further, it is clear that how we perceive music depends at least to some extent on prior experience. Thus the relevance of psychological experimentation to music theory requires careful definition. In this chapter I first review major developments in music theory from an historical point of view. Following this I explore various issues that are currently being studied both by music theorists and by psychologists. Finally, I discuss the role of psychology in music theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology and its Allied Disciplines\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology and its Allied Disciplines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315781808-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and its Allied Disciplines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315781808-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

心理学与音乐之间的关系具有新科学与既定学科之间关系的特点。西方音乐理论有着非常古老的传统,至少可以追溯到毕达哥拉斯时代;这一传统的哲学基础在古代就建立起来了,今天仍然存在。这一传统的最大特点是它的理性主义。与科学学科相比,音乐理论在过去几百年的发展并没有以经验方法的增长为特征。相反,当作曲家不断尝试新的表达方式时,音乐理论家总体上是系统的建设者,他们试图证明现有的作曲实践或在数字命理的基础上规定新的实践。此外,当一个外部原理被用来作为一种解释手段时,最常见的是这样一个原理是从物理学中获得的。音乐本质上是我们处理机制的产物,因此与心理学相关的概念很少被接受。采取这种理性主义立场有几个原因,其中大部分已不再适用。其中一个原因是缺乏关于声音本质的知识。可以理解的是,无法描述物理刺激的特征会阻碍有关如何处理这种刺激的理论的发展。一个相关的原因是刺激控制不佳,这使得实验变得困难。第三个原因是缺乏适当的数学技术来研究概率现象。然而,另一个原因至今仍与我们同在,那就是音乐本身的特殊性。没有外在的标准来区分音乐和非音乐,或者区分好音乐和坏音乐。此外,很明显,我们如何感知音乐至少在一定程度上取决于先前的经验。因此,心理学实验与音乐理论的相关性需要仔细定义。在本章中,我首先从历史的角度回顾音乐理论的主要发展。接下来,我将探讨音乐理论家和心理学家目前正在研究的各种问题。最后,我讨论了心理学在音乐理论中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychology and Music
The relationship between psychology and music is characteristic of that between a new science and an established discipline. Western music theory has a very old tradition, dating at least from the time of Pythagoras; and the philosophical underpinnings of this tradition that were established in ancient times still exist today. Most characteristic of this tradition is its rationalism. In contrast with the scientific disciplines, the development of music theory over the last few hundred years has not been characterized by a growth in the empirical method. Rather, while composers have constantly experimented with new means of expression, music theorists have on the whole been system builders who sought to justify existing compositional practice or to prescribe new practice on numerological grounds. Further, when an external principle has been invoked as an explanatory device, most commonly such a principle was taken from physics. The concept of music as essentially the product of our processing mechanisms and therefore related to psychology has only rarely been entertained. There are several reasons why this rationalistic stance was adopted, most of which no longer apply. One reason was a paucity of knowledge concerning the nature of sound. It is understandable that the inability to characterize a physical stimulus should have inhibited the development of theories concerning how this stimulus is processed. A related reason was poor stimulus control, which made experimentation difficult. A third reason was the lack of appropriate mathematical techniques with which to study probabilistic phenomena. However, another reason, which is still with us today, lies in the peculiar nature of music itself. There are no external criteria for distinguishing between music and nonmusic, or between good music and bad music. Further, it is clear that how we perceive music depends at least to some extent on prior experience. Thus the relevance of psychological experimentation to music theory requires careful definition. In this chapter I first review major developments in music theory from an historical point of view. Following this I explore various issues that are currently being studied both by music theorists and by psychologists. Finally, I discuss the role of psychology in music theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信