{"title":"基于TOPSIS的环境移民目的地选择","authors":"Emma Kuttler, Buket Cilali, K. Barker","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS52267.2021.9483764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effects of climate change will lead to the forced displacement of millions and will cause dramatic changes to human settlement and migration patterns. The most vulnerable populations will travel as environmental migrants through a complicated quasi-governmental resettlement system of aid camps in the hope of finding long-term placements. These people deserve safe housing and the location they permanently settle in has critical socio-political impacts. Prior research has generally focused on post-conflict or post-disaster relief location selection for a facility at a single point in time or single-period refugee resettlement, with even less work dedicated to environmental migration. Furthermore, the scale of this work is typically limited to a city or country with the geographic area available for relocation remaining static, while in a climate change scenario the habitable land changes over time. We extend the problem of single-period resettlement to multi-period resettlement using the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), a straightforward multi-criteria decision-making method. We propose a method to iterate resettlement across multiple planning periods and incorporate geospatial, cultural, environmental, and capacity criteria. The set of alternatives, or destinations countries, will change with each planning period to represent the changing habitable environment. Ratios of weights between iterations remain constant. TOPSIS will produce a ranked list of destination sites. The methodology will be illustrated with a generated data set using a set of vulnerable source locations and a set of destination sites, both of which will change in each planning period. We found more variation in the rankings between periods than with standard TOPSIS, as well as greater sensitivity to weights. This work can be applied to any sort of long-term multi-criteria location selection problems (e.g., store openings and closings under changing consumer demand).","PeriodicalId":426747,"journal":{"name":"2021 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Destination Selection in Environmental Migration with TOPSIS\",\"authors\":\"Emma Kuttler, Buket Cilali, K. Barker\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SIEDS52267.2021.9483764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The effects of climate change will lead to the forced displacement of millions and will cause dramatic changes to human settlement and migration patterns. The most vulnerable populations will travel as environmental migrants through a complicated quasi-governmental resettlement system of aid camps in the hope of finding long-term placements. These people deserve safe housing and the location they permanently settle in has critical socio-political impacts. Prior research has generally focused on post-conflict or post-disaster relief location selection for a facility at a single point in time or single-period refugee resettlement, with even less work dedicated to environmental migration. Furthermore, the scale of this work is typically limited to a city or country with the geographic area available for relocation remaining static, while in a climate change scenario the habitable land changes over time. We extend the problem of single-period resettlement to multi-period resettlement using the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), a straightforward multi-criteria decision-making method. We propose a method to iterate resettlement across multiple planning periods and incorporate geospatial, cultural, environmental, and capacity criteria. The set of alternatives, or destinations countries, will change with each planning period to represent the changing habitable environment. Ratios of weights between iterations remain constant. TOPSIS will produce a ranked list of destination sites. The methodology will be illustrated with a generated data set using a set of vulnerable source locations and a set of destination sites, both of which will change in each planning period. We found more variation in the rankings between periods than with standard TOPSIS, as well as greater sensitivity to weights. This work can be applied to any sort of long-term multi-criteria location selection problems (e.g., store openings and closings under changing consumer demand).\",\"PeriodicalId\":426747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS52267.2021.9483764\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS52267.2021.9483764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
气候变化的影响将导致数百万人被迫流离失所,并将对人类住区和移徙模式造成巨大变化。最脆弱的人群将以环境移民的身份,通过一个复杂的准政府安置系统——援助营地,希望找到长期的安置地点。这些人应该得到安全的住房,他们永久定居的地点具有关键的社会政治影响。先前的研究一般集中在冲突后或灾后的单一时间点或单一时期难民安置设施的地点选择上,而对环境移民的研究就更少了。此外,这项工作的规模通常局限于可搬迁的地理区域保持静态的城市或国家,而在气候变化情景下,可居住的土地会随着时间的推移而变化。将单期移民问题推广到多期移民问题中,采用了一种简单的多准则决策方法TOPSIS (order preference by similarity by ideal solution)。我们提出了一种跨多个规划期迭代安置的方法,并结合地理空间、文化、环境和能力标准。备选方案或目的地国家将随着每个规划时期的变化而变化,以代表不断变化的可居住环境。迭代之间的权重比率保持不变。TOPSIS将生成一个目的地排名列表。将使用一组易受攻击的来源地点和一组目的地地点生成的数据集来说明该方法,这两个地点在每个规划期间都将发生变化。我们发现,与标准TOPSIS相比,不同时期的排名变化更大,对权重的敏感度也更高。这项工作可以应用于任何类型的长期多标准选址问题(例如,在不断变化的消费者需求下开设和关闭商店)。
Destination Selection in Environmental Migration with TOPSIS
The effects of climate change will lead to the forced displacement of millions and will cause dramatic changes to human settlement and migration patterns. The most vulnerable populations will travel as environmental migrants through a complicated quasi-governmental resettlement system of aid camps in the hope of finding long-term placements. These people deserve safe housing and the location they permanently settle in has critical socio-political impacts. Prior research has generally focused on post-conflict or post-disaster relief location selection for a facility at a single point in time or single-period refugee resettlement, with even less work dedicated to environmental migration. Furthermore, the scale of this work is typically limited to a city or country with the geographic area available for relocation remaining static, while in a climate change scenario the habitable land changes over time. We extend the problem of single-period resettlement to multi-period resettlement using the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), a straightforward multi-criteria decision-making method. We propose a method to iterate resettlement across multiple planning periods and incorporate geospatial, cultural, environmental, and capacity criteria. The set of alternatives, or destinations countries, will change with each planning period to represent the changing habitable environment. Ratios of weights between iterations remain constant. TOPSIS will produce a ranked list of destination sites. The methodology will be illustrated with a generated data set using a set of vulnerable source locations and a set of destination sites, both of which will change in each planning period. We found more variation in the rankings between periods than with standard TOPSIS, as well as greater sensitivity to weights. This work can be applied to any sort of long-term multi-criteria location selection problems (e.g., store openings and closings under changing consumer demand).