协同过滤与效用挖掘相结合的混合推荐系统

M. Fouad, Wedad Hussein, S. Rady, Philip S. Yu, Tarek G Gharib
{"title":"协同过滤与效用挖掘相结合的混合推荐系统","authors":"M. Fouad, Wedad Hussein, S. Rady, Philip S. Yu, Tarek G Gharib","doi":"10.21608/ijicis.2022.145103.1192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Based on a variety of information sources, recommender systems can identify specific items for various user interests. Techniques for recommender systems are classified into two types: personalized and non-personalized. Personalized algorithms are based on individual user preferences or collaborative filtering data; as the system learns more about the user, the recommendations will become more satisfying. They do, however, suffer from data sparsity and cold start issues. On the other hand, non-personalized algorithms make recommendations based on the importance of the items in the database; they are very useful when the system has no information about a specific user. Their accuracy, however, is limited by the issue of personalization. In most cases, one of the recommendation categories can be used to make recommendations. Yet, it is a challenge to evaluate the importance of items to the user while simultaneously using personalized and non-personalized preferences functions and ranking a set of candidate items based on these functions. This paper addresses this issue and improves recommendation quality by introducing a new hybrid recommendation technique. The proposed hybrid recommendation technique combines the importance of items to the user obtained by the utility mining method with the similarity weights of items produced by the collaborative filtering technique to make the recommendation process more reasonable and accurate. This technique can provide appropriate recommendations whether or not users have previous purchasing histories. Finally, experimental results show that the proposed hybrid recommendation technique outperforms both implemented collaborative filtering and utility-based recommendation techniques.","PeriodicalId":244591,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Information Sciences","volume":"484 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Hybrid Recommender System Combining Collaborative Filtering with Utility Mining\",\"authors\":\"M. Fouad, Wedad Hussein, S. Rady, Philip S. Yu, Tarek G Gharib\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ijicis.2022.145103.1192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Based on a variety of information sources, recommender systems can identify specific items for various user interests. Techniques for recommender systems are classified into two types: personalized and non-personalized. Personalized algorithms are based on individual user preferences or collaborative filtering data; as the system learns more about the user, the recommendations will become more satisfying. They do, however, suffer from data sparsity and cold start issues. On the other hand, non-personalized algorithms make recommendations based on the importance of the items in the database; they are very useful when the system has no information about a specific user. Their accuracy, however, is limited by the issue of personalization. In most cases, one of the recommendation categories can be used to make recommendations. Yet, it is a challenge to evaluate the importance of items to the user while simultaneously using personalized and non-personalized preferences functions and ranking a set of candidate items based on these functions. This paper addresses this issue and improves recommendation quality by introducing a new hybrid recommendation technique. The proposed hybrid recommendation technique combines the importance of items to the user obtained by the utility mining method with the similarity weights of items produced by the collaborative filtering technique to make the recommendation process more reasonable and accurate. This technique can provide appropriate recommendations whether or not users have previous purchasing histories. Finally, experimental results show that the proposed hybrid recommendation technique outperforms both implemented collaborative filtering and utility-based recommendation techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":244591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Information Sciences\",\"volume\":\"484 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Information Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ijicis.2022.145103.1192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Information Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ijicis.2022.145103.1192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

基于各种信息源,推荐系统可以根据不同的用户兴趣识别特定的项目。推荐系统的技术分为两类:个性化和非个性化。个性化算法基于个人用户偏好或协同过滤数据;随着系统对用户的了解越来越多,推荐也会越来越令人满意。然而,它们确实存在数据稀疏性和冷启动问题。另一方面,非个性化算法根据数据库中项目的重要性进行推荐;当系统没有关于特定用户的信息时,它们非常有用。然而,它们的准确性受到个性化问题的限制。在大多数情况下,可以使用其中一个推荐类别来提出建议。然而,在同时使用个性化和非个性化偏好函数并根据这些函数对一组候选项目进行排名时,评估项目对用户的重要性是一个挑战。本文解决了这一问题,并通过引入一种新的混合推荐技术来提高推荐质量。提出的混合推荐技术将效用挖掘方法获得的物品对用户的重要性与协同过滤技术产生的物品相似度权重相结合,使推荐过程更加合理和准确。该技术可以提供适当的建议,无论用户是否有以前的购买历史。最后,实验结果表明,所提出的混合推荐技术优于已实现的协同过滤和基于效用的推荐技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Hybrid Recommender System Combining Collaborative Filtering with Utility Mining
: Based on a variety of information sources, recommender systems can identify specific items for various user interests. Techniques for recommender systems are classified into two types: personalized and non-personalized. Personalized algorithms are based on individual user preferences or collaborative filtering data; as the system learns more about the user, the recommendations will become more satisfying. They do, however, suffer from data sparsity and cold start issues. On the other hand, non-personalized algorithms make recommendations based on the importance of the items in the database; they are very useful when the system has no information about a specific user. Their accuracy, however, is limited by the issue of personalization. In most cases, one of the recommendation categories can be used to make recommendations. Yet, it is a challenge to evaluate the importance of items to the user while simultaneously using personalized and non-personalized preferences functions and ranking a set of candidate items based on these functions. This paper addresses this issue and improves recommendation quality by introducing a new hybrid recommendation technique. The proposed hybrid recommendation technique combines the importance of items to the user obtained by the utility mining method with the similarity weights of items produced by the collaborative filtering technique to make the recommendation process more reasonable and accurate. This technique can provide appropriate recommendations whether or not users have previous purchasing histories. Finally, experimental results show that the proposed hybrid recommendation technique outperforms both implemented collaborative filtering and utility-based recommendation techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信