{"title":"自然认识论与证据法:对帕尔多、斯佩尔曼、穆法托和伊诺克的回答","authors":"R. Allen","doi":"10.33115/UDG_BIB/QF.I3.22597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence Revisited, the original target article for the various refutations that I comment on here, I revisited through a slightly different lens the subject of the article that I co-authored with Brian Leiter close to twenty years ago.","PeriodicalId":252725,"journal":{"name":"Quaestio facti. Revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence: A Reply to Pardo, Spellman, Muffato, and Enoch\",\"authors\":\"R. Allen\",\"doi\":\"10.33115/UDG_BIB/QF.I3.22597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence Revisited, the original target article for the various refutations that I comment on here, I revisited through a slightly different lens the subject of the article that I co-authored with Brian Leiter close to twenty years ago.\",\"PeriodicalId\":252725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quaestio facti. Revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quaestio facti. Revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33115/UDG_BIB/QF.I3.22597\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaestio facti. Revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33115/UDG_BIB/QF.I3.22597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence: A Reply to Pardo, Spellman, Muffato, and Enoch
In Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence Revisited, the original target article for the various refutations that I comment on here, I revisited through a slightly different lens the subject of the article that I co-authored with Brian Leiter close to twenty years ago.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
