SDN控制的静态和动态网状网络中q -学习的性能

D. Harewood-Gill, T. Martin, R. Nejabati
{"title":"SDN控制的静态和动态网状网络中q -学习的性能","authors":"D. Harewood-Gill, T. Martin, R. Nejabati","doi":"10.1109/NetSoft48620.2020.9165530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current infrastructures are reaching the point where existing networking methods are unable to cope with the exponential growth of traffic and Quality of Service (QoS) requirements. New techniques are necessary to keep pace. One such technique, Software-Defined Networking (SDN) uses a central controller to program many individual network devices. However, SDN uses heuristic algorithms that do not always select the optimal path. This paper looked at creating three Q-Routing algorithms leveraging SDN and Mesh network topologies. Two algorithms used one network metric each (Latency and Bandwidth) and the third used multiple metrics. Results showed that the single metric Q-Routing algorithms on average performed as well as the K-Shortest Path versions while Q-Routing with multiple network metrics failed to match K-Shortest Path (different combination of metrics means these algorithms are not comparable). Results also showed that Q-Routing was able to calculate paths faster than K-Shortest Path in both static and dynamic networks.","PeriodicalId":239961,"journal":{"name":"2020 6th IEEE Conference on Network Softwarization (NetSoft)","volume":"476 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Performance of Q-Learning within SDN Controlled Static and Dynamic Mesh Networks\",\"authors\":\"D. Harewood-Gill, T. Martin, R. Nejabati\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NetSoft48620.2020.9165530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Current infrastructures are reaching the point where existing networking methods are unable to cope with the exponential growth of traffic and Quality of Service (QoS) requirements. New techniques are necessary to keep pace. One such technique, Software-Defined Networking (SDN) uses a central controller to program many individual network devices. However, SDN uses heuristic algorithms that do not always select the optimal path. This paper looked at creating three Q-Routing algorithms leveraging SDN and Mesh network topologies. Two algorithms used one network metric each (Latency and Bandwidth) and the third used multiple metrics. Results showed that the single metric Q-Routing algorithms on average performed as well as the K-Shortest Path versions while Q-Routing with multiple network metrics failed to match K-Shortest Path (different combination of metrics means these algorithms are not comparable). Results also showed that Q-Routing was able to calculate paths faster than K-Shortest Path in both static and dynamic networks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":239961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 6th IEEE Conference on Network Softwarization (NetSoft)\",\"volume\":\"476 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 6th IEEE Conference on Network Softwarization (NetSoft)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NetSoft48620.2020.9165530\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 6th IEEE Conference on Network Softwarization (NetSoft)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NetSoft48620.2020.9165530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当前的基础设施正在达到现有网络方法无法应对流量指数级增长和服务质量(QoS)需求的地步。新技术是跟上步伐所必需的。软件定义网络(SDN)就是这样一种技术,它使用一个中央控制器对许多独立的网络设备进行编程。然而,SDN使用的启发式算法并不总是选择最优路径。本文着眼于利用SDN和Mesh网络拓扑结构创建三种Q-Routing算法。两种算法分别使用一个网络度量(延迟和带宽),第三种算法使用多个度量。结果表明,单度量Q-Routing算法的平均性能与k -最短路径版本一样好,而具有多个网络度量的Q-Routing无法匹配k -最短路径(不同的度量组合意味着这些算法不具有可比性)。结果还表明,无论在静态网络还是动态网络中,Q-Routing都能比k -最短路径更快地计算路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Performance of Q-Learning within SDN Controlled Static and Dynamic Mesh Networks
Current infrastructures are reaching the point where existing networking methods are unable to cope with the exponential growth of traffic and Quality of Service (QoS) requirements. New techniques are necessary to keep pace. One such technique, Software-Defined Networking (SDN) uses a central controller to program many individual network devices. However, SDN uses heuristic algorithms that do not always select the optimal path. This paper looked at creating three Q-Routing algorithms leveraging SDN and Mesh network topologies. Two algorithms used one network metric each (Latency and Bandwidth) and the third used multiple metrics. Results showed that the single metric Q-Routing algorithms on average performed as well as the K-Shortest Path versions while Q-Routing with multiple network metrics failed to match K-Shortest Path (different combination of metrics means these algorithms are not comparable). Results also showed that Q-Routing was able to calculate paths faster than K-Shortest Path in both static and dynamic networks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信