Fuqaha shafi 'iyyah和hanabilah理解的圣训成员在祈祷中俯伏

Tarmizi M. Jakfar
{"title":"Fuqaha shafi 'iyyah和hanabilah理解的圣训成员在祈祷中俯伏","authors":"Tarmizi M. Jakfar","doi":"10.22373/dusturiyah.v13i1.18106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The jurists differ as to the legal status of sticking one's nose to the place of prostration or the floor. These differences of opinion influenced public opinion and opinions, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic. For example, related to the opinion regarding the law of wearing a mask at times because it can cover the nose so that it can cancel the prayer, but there is also an opinion that says that it is permissible to use it. The controversy between whether or not it is permissible to use something that prevents the nose from sticking together when prostrating is conveyed by the Syafi'ī and Ḥanbalī schools. Therefore, this article explains the difference between the Al-Syāfi‘ī school and the Ḥanbalī school in determining the law of sticking the nose when prostrating? and what are the arguments and methods of ijtihad used by the scholars of the Al-Syāfi‘ī and Ḥanbalī schools? This research approach is a qualitative approach, this type of research is normative legal research, while the nature of the data analysis used is the comparative analysis method. The results of this study indicate that the differences between the Al-Syāfi‘ī and Ḥanbalī schools in establishing the law of sticking one's nose during prostration are identified in two points. First, about the legal status. According to the scholars of the Shafi'i school, the nose is not a part of the face that must be attached during prostration, the law is only limited to sunnah. The Hanbali school considers that the nose, the part of the face that must be attached to the ground, is obligatory. Second, about the legal consequences. For the scholars of the Shafi'i school, the legal consequences of praying without sticking your nose are still valid, while according to the Hanbali school it is not valid. The argument of the scholars of the Syafi'i school is the hadith narrated by Imam Al-Bukhari from Ibn Abbas, that the members of prostration are only the forehead, both hands, both knees and both feet. No mention of nose. Then Daruquthni's narration from Jabir, when he saw Rasulullah Saw prostrating with the top of the forehead near the hair. The istinbat method used is the bayani and ta'lili methods. Meanwhile, according to the Hanbali school, the argument used is the history of Imam Al-Bukhari from Ibn Abbas who mentions the Prophet's gesture to point his nose in prostration. Then the narrations of Muslim and Al-Nasa'i regarding the mention of jabhah wa al-anfu (forehead and nose) as members of prostration, in addition to the history of Atsram which states that it is obligatory to stick your nose during prayer. The istinbat method used is the bayani method and the ta'lili method.","PeriodicalId":415658,"journal":{"name":"Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FUQAHA SHAFI'IYYAH AND HANABILAH UNDERSTANDING OF THE HADITH OF PROSTRATION MEMBERS IN PRAYER\",\"authors\":\"Tarmizi M. Jakfar\",\"doi\":\"10.22373/dusturiyah.v13i1.18106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The jurists differ as to the legal status of sticking one's nose to the place of prostration or the floor. These differences of opinion influenced public opinion and opinions, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic. For example, related to the opinion regarding the law of wearing a mask at times because it can cover the nose so that it can cancel the prayer, but there is also an opinion that says that it is permissible to use it. The controversy between whether or not it is permissible to use something that prevents the nose from sticking together when prostrating is conveyed by the Syafi'ī and Ḥanbalī schools. Therefore, this article explains the difference between the Al-Syāfi‘ī school and the Ḥanbalī school in determining the law of sticking the nose when prostrating? and what are the arguments and methods of ijtihad used by the scholars of the Al-Syāfi‘ī and Ḥanbalī schools? This research approach is a qualitative approach, this type of research is normative legal research, while the nature of the data analysis used is the comparative analysis method. The results of this study indicate that the differences between the Al-Syāfi‘ī and Ḥanbalī schools in establishing the law of sticking one's nose during prostration are identified in two points. First, about the legal status. According to the scholars of the Shafi'i school, the nose is not a part of the face that must be attached during prostration, the law is only limited to sunnah. The Hanbali school considers that the nose, the part of the face that must be attached to the ground, is obligatory. Second, about the legal consequences. For the scholars of the Shafi'i school, the legal consequences of praying without sticking your nose are still valid, while according to the Hanbali school it is not valid. The argument of the scholars of the Syafi'i school is the hadith narrated by Imam Al-Bukhari from Ibn Abbas, that the members of prostration are only the forehead, both hands, both knees and both feet. No mention of nose. Then Daruquthni's narration from Jabir, when he saw Rasulullah Saw prostrating with the top of the forehead near the hair. The istinbat method used is the bayani and ta'lili methods. Meanwhile, according to the Hanbali school, the argument used is the history of Imam Al-Bukhari from Ibn Abbas who mentions the Prophet's gesture to point his nose in prostration. Then the narrations of Muslim and Al-Nasa'i regarding the mention of jabhah wa al-anfu (forehead and nose) as members of prostration, in addition to the history of Atsram which states that it is obligatory to stick your nose during prayer. The istinbat method used is the bayani method and the ta'lili method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":415658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22373/dusturiyah.v13i1.18106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22373/dusturiyah.v13i1.18106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于把鼻子贴在匍匐的地方或地板上的法律地位,法学家们意见不一。这些意见分歧影响了公众舆论和意见,特别是在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间。例如,关于有时戴口罩的法律的意见,因为它可以盖住鼻子,这样就可以取消祈祷,但也有一种意见说,允许使用口罩。关于是否允许在跪拜时使用防止鼻子粘在一起的东西的争论是由Syafi' ' '和Ḥanbalī学派传达的。因此,本文解释了Al-Syāfi ' ' '学派与Ḥanbalī学派在确定磕头法上的差异。Al-Syāfi ' ' '和Ḥanbalī学派的学者使用的伊智提哈德的论点和方法是什么?这种研究方法是定性的方法,这种类型的研究是规范性的法律研究,而使用的数据分析的性质是比较分析法。研究结果表明,Al-Syāfi ' ' ' '与Ḥanbalī学派在确立磕头律上的差异主要体现在两点上。首先,关于法律地位。根据沙菲派学者的说法,鼻子并不是在跪拜时必须附着在脸上的一部分,法律只局限于圣行。汉巴里学派认为,鼻子是脸的一部分,必须附着在地面上,这是强制性的。第二,关于法律后果。对于Shafi'i学派的学者来说,不伸出鼻子祈祷的法律后果仍然有效,而根据汉巴里学派,这是无效的。Syafi学派的学者们的论点是伊玛目布哈里从伊本阿巴斯那里讲述的圣训,即俯伏的成员只有额头,双手,双膝和双脚。没有提到鼻子。然后是达鲁古特尼对贾比尔的叙述,当他看到拉苏鲁拉·索伏在地上,前额接近头发。使用的istinbat方法是bayani和ta'lili方法。与此同时,根据汉巴利学派的说法,使用的论据是伊本·阿巴斯的伊玛目布哈里的历史,他提到了先知用鼻子指向匍伏的手势。然后是穆斯林和Al-Nasa'i关于提到jabhah wa al-anfu(额头和鼻子)作为跪拜的成员的叙述,此外还有Atsram的历史,其中规定在祈祷期间必须竖起鼻子。使用的istinbat方法是bayani方法和ta'lili方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FUQAHA SHAFI'IYYAH AND HANABILAH UNDERSTANDING OF THE HADITH OF PROSTRATION MEMBERS IN PRAYER
The jurists differ as to the legal status of sticking one's nose to the place of prostration or the floor. These differences of opinion influenced public opinion and opinions, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic. For example, related to the opinion regarding the law of wearing a mask at times because it can cover the nose so that it can cancel the prayer, but there is also an opinion that says that it is permissible to use it. The controversy between whether or not it is permissible to use something that prevents the nose from sticking together when prostrating is conveyed by the Syafi'ī and Ḥanbalī schools. Therefore, this article explains the difference between the Al-Syāfi‘ī school and the Ḥanbalī school in determining the law of sticking the nose when prostrating? and what are the arguments and methods of ijtihad used by the scholars of the Al-Syāfi‘ī and Ḥanbalī schools? This research approach is a qualitative approach, this type of research is normative legal research, while the nature of the data analysis used is the comparative analysis method. The results of this study indicate that the differences between the Al-Syāfi‘ī and Ḥanbalī schools in establishing the law of sticking one's nose during prostration are identified in two points. First, about the legal status. According to the scholars of the Shafi'i school, the nose is not a part of the face that must be attached during prostration, the law is only limited to sunnah. The Hanbali school considers that the nose, the part of the face that must be attached to the ground, is obligatory. Second, about the legal consequences. For the scholars of the Shafi'i school, the legal consequences of praying without sticking your nose are still valid, while according to the Hanbali school it is not valid. The argument of the scholars of the Syafi'i school is the hadith narrated by Imam Al-Bukhari from Ibn Abbas, that the members of prostration are only the forehead, both hands, both knees and both feet. No mention of nose. Then Daruquthni's narration from Jabir, when he saw Rasulullah Saw prostrating with the top of the forehead near the hair. The istinbat method used is the bayani and ta'lili methods. Meanwhile, according to the Hanbali school, the argument used is the history of Imam Al-Bukhari from Ibn Abbas who mentions the Prophet's gesture to point his nose in prostration. Then the narrations of Muslim and Al-Nasa'i regarding the mention of jabhah wa al-anfu (forehead and nose) as members of prostration, in addition to the history of Atsram which states that it is obligatory to stick your nose during prayer. The istinbat method used is the bayani method and the ta'lili method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信