日语考试作文自动评分系统中MLP-BPNN与MLP-PSO的比较

Farhan P. Putra, Prima Dewi Purnamasari, A. A. P. Ratna, Lea Santiar
{"title":"日语考试作文自动评分系统中MLP-BPNN与MLP-PSO的比较","authors":"Farhan P. Putra, Prima Dewi Purnamasari, A. A. P. Ratna, Lea Santiar","doi":"10.1109/QIR54354.2021.9716163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a study was conducted for a hybrid model for Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) with Particle Swarm optimization (PSO). The PSO was used to replace the Backpropagation method for the weight optimization. The comparison was conducted between MLP-BPNN and MLPPSO for an automated essay grading system for Japanese language exam. The MLP-PSO model achieved a more accurate but less stable result. The MLP-PSO model with 10 particles trained for 15 steps achieves the best result out of the two MLP-PSO models tested, with an average 8.48% error for the grade population. Compared to the MLP-PSO model, it was discovered that MLP-BPNN with Adam optimizer achieves better overall performance and results concerning both the accuracy and the stability of the model.","PeriodicalId":446396,"journal":{"name":"2021 17th International Conference on Quality in Research (QIR): International Symposium on Electrical and Computer Engineering","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of MLP-BPNN and MLP-PSO for Automatic Essay Grading System for Japanese Language Exam\",\"authors\":\"Farhan P. Putra, Prima Dewi Purnamasari, A. A. P. Ratna, Lea Santiar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QIR54354.2021.9716163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, a study was conducted for a hybrid model for Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) with Particle Swarm optimization (PSO). The PSO was used to replace the Backpropagation method for the weight optimization. The comparison was conducted between MLP-BPNN and MLPPSO for an automated essay grading system for Japanese language exam. The MLP-PSO model achieved a more accurate but less stable result. The MLP-PSO model with 10 particles trained for 15 steps achieves the best result out of the two MLP-PSO models tested, with an average 8.48% error for the grade population. Compared to the MLP-PSO model, it was discovered that MLP-BPNN with Adam optimizer achieves better overall performance and results concerning both the accuracy and the stability of the model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":446396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 17th International Conference on Quality in Research (QIR): International Symposium on Electrical and Computer Engineering\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 17th International Conference on Quality in Research (QIR): International Symposium on Electrical and Computer Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QIR54354.2021.9716163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 17th International Conference on Quality in Research (QIR): International Symposium on Electrical and Computer Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QIR54354.2021.9716163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文研究了多层感知器(MLP)与粒子群优化(PSO)的混合模型。采用粒子群算法代替反向传播法进行权值优化。将MLP-BPNN和MLPPSO用于日语考试作文自动评分系统进行了比较。MLP-PSO模型获得了更精确但稳定性较差的结果。在测试的两个MLP-PSO模型中,经过15步训练的10个粒子的MLP-PSO模型获得了最好的结果,对等级总体的平均误差为8.48%。与MLP-PSO模型相比,使用Adam优化器的MLP-BPNN在模型的精度和稳定性方面都取得了更好的综合性能和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of MLP-BPNN and MLP-PSO for Automatic Essay Grading System for Japanese Language Exam
In this paper, a study was conducted for a hybrid model for Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) with Particle Swarm optimization (PSO). The PSO was used to replace the Backpropagation method for the weight optimization. The comparison was conducted between MLP-BPNN and MLPPSO for an automated essay grading system for Japanese language exam. The MLP-PSO model achieved a more accurate but less stable result. The MLP-PSO model with 10 particles trained for 15 steps achieves the best result out of the two MLP-PSO models tested, with an average 8.48% error for the grade population. Compared to the MLP-PSO model, it was discovered that MLP-BPNN with Adam optimizer achieves better overall performance and results concerning both the accuracy and the stability of the model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信