乔治亚州公平借贷法案通过后货币监理署发布的优先公告对财富的影响

Gary W. Whalen
{"title":"乔治亚州公平借贷法案通过后货币监理署发布的优先公告对财富的影响","authors":"Gary W. Whalen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.869038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2004 the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) concluded that federal law preempted anti-predatory lending statutes in Georgia and other states. The OCC asserted that preemption reduces compliance costs especially for smaller, multistate banking companies. Opponents countered that preemption disadvantages state banks endangering the dual banking system. Event study evidence is consistent with the OCC's assertion, but there is little support for the notion that preemption significantly disadvantages state bank-dominated companies. In fact, the excess returns of smaller state bank-dominated companies are generally positive and do not differ significantly from comparable national bank-dominated companies.","PeriodicalId":162065,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Law & Economics: Private Law (Topic)","volume":"278 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Wealth Effects of Preemption Announcements by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency after the Passage of the Georgia Fair Lending Act\",\"authors\":\"Gary W. Whalen\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.869038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2004 the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) concluded that federal law preempted anti-predatory lending statutes in Georgia and other states. The OCC asserted that preemption reduces compliance costs especially for smaller, multistate banking companies. Opponents countered that preemption disadvantages state banks endangering the dual banking system. Event study evidence is consistent with the OCC's assertion, but there is little support for the notion that preemption significantly disadvantages state bank-dominated companies. In fact, the excess returns of smaller state bank-dominated companies are generally positive and do not differ significantly from comparable national bank-dominated companies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":162065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Law & Economics: Private Law (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"278 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Law & Economics: Private Law (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.869038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Law & Economics: Private Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.869038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

2004年,美国货币监理署(OCC)得出结论,联邦法律优先于乔治亚州和其他州的反掠夺性贷款法规。OCC声称,优先购买权降低了合规成本,尤其是对规模较小的跨国银行公司而言。反对者反驳说,这种先发制人的做法不利于国有银行,危及双重银行体系。事件研究的证据与OCC的断言一致,但几乎没有证据支持优先购买权对国有银行主导的公司明显不利的观点。事实上,较小的国有银行主导的公司的超额回报通常是正的,与国有银行主导的可比公司没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Wealth Effects of Preemption Announcements by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency after the Passage of the Georgia Fair Lending Act
In 2004 the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) concluded that federal law preempted anti-predatory lending statutes in Georgia and other states. The OCC asserted that preemption reduces compliance costs especially for smaller, multistate banking companies. Opponents countered that preemption disadvantages state banks endangering the dual banking system. Event study evidence is consistent with the OCC's assertion, but there is little support for the notion that preemption significantly disadvantages state bank-dominated companies. In fact, the excess returns of smaller state bank-dominated companies are generally positive and do not differ significantly from comparable national bank-dominated companies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信