K. Manjunath, Vaibhav Anu, G. Walia, Gary L. Bradshaw
{"title":"培训行业从业者调查需求错误的人为错误原因","authors":"K. Manjunath, Vaibhav Anu, G. Walia, Gary L. Bradshaw","doi":"10.1109/ISSREW.2018.00-31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports an industrial study that was conducted to evaluate whether human error training procedures and instrumentation created by authors can be used to train industry software practitioners on human errors that occur during requirements engineering process. Industry practitioners were trained (using an on-line audio-visual package) to analyze requirements faults and map them to underlying human errors (i.e., the root causes of faults). Results of the study show that even though our training helped practitioners in gaining knowledge about requirements phase human errors, parts of the training procedures need to be improved. Additionally, practitioners also reported mechanisms to prevent human errors from happening during the requirements engineering process. These mechanisms can help organizations create interventions (like checklists) that can help software developers avoid committing human errors, thereby preventing faults that are caused due to these errors.","PeriodicalId":321448,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Training Industry Practitioners to Investigate the Human Error Causes of Requirements Faults\",\"authors\":\"K. Manjunath, Vaibhav Anu, G. Walia, Gary L. Bradshaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISSREW.2018.00-31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper reports an industrial study that was conducted to evaluate whether human error training procedures and instrumentation created by authors can be used to train industry software practitioners on human errors that occur during requirements engineering process. Industry practitioners were trained (using an on-line audio-visual package) to analyze requirements faults and map them to underlying human errors (i.e., the root causes of faults). Results of the study show that even though our training helped practitioners in gaining knowledge about requirements phase human errors, parts of the training procedures need to be improved. Additionally, practitioners also reported mechanisms to prevent human errors from happening during the requirements engineering process. These mechanisms can help organizations create interventions (like checklists) that can help software developers avoid committing human errors, thereby preventing faults that are caused due to these errors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":321448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW.2018.00-31\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW.2018.00-31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Training Industry Practitioners to Investigate the Human Error Causes of Requirements Faults
This paper reports an industrial study that was conducted to evaluate whether human error training procedures and instrumentation created by authors can be used to train industry software practitioners on human errors that occur during requirements engineering process. Industry practitioners were trained (using an on-line audio-visual package) to analyze requirements faults and map them to underlying human errors (i.e., the root causes of faults). Results of the study show that even though our training helped practitioners in gaining knowledge about requirements phase human errors, parts of the training procedures need to be improved. Additionally, practitioners also reported mechanisms to prevent human errors from happening during the requirements engineering process. These mechanisms can help organizations create interventions (like checklists) that can help software developers avoid committing human errors, thereby preventing faults that are caused due to these errors.