培训行业从业者调查需求错误的人为错误原因

K. Manjunath, Vaibhav Anu, G. Walia, Gary L. Bradshaw
{"title":"培训行业从业者调查需求错误的人为错误原因","authors":"K. Manjunath, Vaibhav Anu, G. Walia, Gary L. Bradshaw","doi":"10.1109/ISSREW.2018.00-31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports an industrial study that was conducted to evaluate whether human error training procedures and instrumentation created by authors can be used to train industry software practitioners on human errors that occur during requirements engineering process. Industry practitioners were trained (using an on-line audio-visual package) to analyze requirements faults and map them to underlying human errors (i.e., the root causes of faults). Results of the study show that even though our training helped practitioners in gaining knowledge about requirements phase human errors, parts of the training procedures need to be improved. Additionally, practitioners also reported mechanisms to prevent human errors from happening during the requirements engineering process. These mechanisms can help organizations create interventions (like checklists) that can help software developers avoid committing human errors, thereby preventing faults that are caused due to these errors.","PeriodicalId":321448,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Training Industry Practitioners to Investigate the Human Error Causes of Requirements Faults\",\"authors\":\"K. Manjunath, Vaibhav Anu, G. Walia, Gary L. Bradshaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISSREW.2018.00-31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper reports an industrial study that was conducted to evaluate whether human error training procedures and instrumentation created by authors can be used to train industry software practitioners on human errors that occur during requirements engineering process. Industry practitioners were trained (using an on-line audio-visual package) to analyze requirements faults and map them to underlying human errors (i.e., the root causes of faults). Results of the study show that even though our training helped practitioners in gaining knowledge about requirements phase human errors, parts of the training procedures need to be improved. Additionally, practitioners also reported mechanisms to prevent human errors from happening during the requirements engineering process. These mechanisms can help organizations create interventions (like checklists) that can help software developers avoid committing human errors, thereby preventing faults that are caused due to these errors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":321448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW.2018.00-31\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW.2018.00-31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文报告了一项工业研究,该研究旨在评估作者创建的人为错误培训程序和仪器是否可以用于培训需求工程过程中发生的人为错误的工业软件从业者。行业从业者接受了培训(使用在线视听包)来分析需求错误,并将它们映射到潜在的人为错误(即,错误的根本原因)。研究的结果表明,尽管我们的培训帮助实践者获得了关于需求阶段人为错误的知识,但是部分培训过程需要改进。此外,从业者还报告了在需求工程过程中防止人为错误发生的机制。这些机制可以帮助组织创建可以帮助软件开发人员避免犯人为错误的干预措施(如检查清单),从而防止由于这些错误而导致的故障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Training Industry Practitioners to Investigate the Human Error Causes of Requirements Faults
This paper reports an industrial study that was conducted to evaluate whether human error training procedures and instrumentation created by authors can be used to train industry software practitioners on human errors that occur during requirements engineering process. Industry practitioners were trained (using an on-line audio-visual package) to analyze requirements faults and map them to underlying human errors (i.e., the root causes of faults). Results of the study show that even though our training helped practitioners in gaining knowledge about requirements phase human errors, parts of the training procedures need to be improved. Additionally, practitioners also reported mechanisms to prevent human errors from happening during the requirements engineering process. These mechanisms can help organizations create interventions (like checklists) that can help software developers avoid committing human errors, thereby preventing faults that are caused due to these errors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信