面部表情识别:瓶颈特征提取的比较

Prasitthichai Naronglerdrit
{"title":"面部表情识别:瓶颈特征提取的比较","authors":"Prasitthichai Naronglerdrit","doi":"10.1109/Ubi-Media.2019.00039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares the performance of bottleneck feature extraction based on two different architectures, the first, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based bottleneck feature extraction and the second, Deep Neural Network (DNN) based bottleneck feature extraction. Both of CNN and DNN based bottleneck feature extraction network were trained for 200 epochs to perform a feature extraction task. The input of bottleneck network is the same as the output which is the preprocessed images. From the bottleneck network, after training, the layers after the bottleneck layer were cut-off and set the bottleneck layer as an output layer. The result of the bottleneck feature extraction is that it can reduce the dimension of the images from 4096 to 128 to be used as a feature vectors for a classification process. In the classification process, it was performed by Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with three fully-connected layers, and trained for 500 epochs. In order to evaluate the performance, the 10-flod cross-validation was applied to the networks. The result is that the CNN based bottleneck feature extraction performs a better performance than DNN based which are 99.54% and 98.91% respectively.","PeriodicalId":259542,"journal":{"name":"2019 Twelfth International Conference on Ubi-Media Computing (Ubi-Media)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facial Expression Recognition: A Comparison of Bottleneck Feature Extraction\",\"authors\":\"Prasitthichai Naronglerdrit\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/Ubi-Media.2019.00039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares the performance of bottleneck feature extraction based on two different architectures, the first, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based bottleneck feature extraction and the second, Deep Neural Network (DNN) based bottleneck feature extraction. Both of CNN and DNN based bottleneck feature extraction network were trained for 200 epochs to perform a feature extraction task. The input of bottleneck network is the same as the output which is the preprocessed images. From the bottleneck network, after training, the layers after the bottleneck layer were cut-off and set the bottleneck layer as an output layer. The result of the bottleneck feature extraction is that it can reduce the dimension of the images from 4096 to 128 to be used as a feature vectors for a classification process. In the classification process, it was performed by Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with three fully-connected layers, and trained for 500 epochs. In order to evaluate the performance, the 10-flod cross-validation was applied to the networks. The result is that the CNN based bottleneck feature extraction performs a better performance than DNN based which are 99.54% and 98.91% respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":259542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 Twelfth International Conference on Ubi-Media Computing (Ubi-Media)\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 Twelfth International Conference on Ubi-Media Computing (Ubi-Media)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/Ubi-Media.2019.00039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Twelfth International Conference on Ubi-Media Computing (Ubi-Media)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/Ubi-Media.2019.00039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文比较了基于卷积神经网络(CNN)的瓶颈特征提取和基于深度神经网络(DNN)的瓶颈特征提取两种不同架构的瓶颈特征提取性能。基于CNN和DNN的瓶颈特征提取网络都进行了200 epoch的训练来完成特征提取任务。瓶颈网络的输入与输出相同,输出是经过预处理的图像。从瓶颈网络中,经过训练后,将瓶颈层之后的层切断,将瓶颈层设置为输出层。瓶颈特征提取的结果是,它可以将图像的维数从4096降至128,作为分类过程的特征向量。在分类过程中,采用三层全连接的人工神经网络(ANN)进行分类,训练500次。为了评估网络的性能,对网络进行了10- flood交叉验证。结果表明,基于CNN的瓶颈特征提取性能优于基于DNN的,分别为99.54%和98.91%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Facial Expression Recognition: A Comparison of Bottleneck Feature Extraction
This paper compares the performance of bottleneck feature extraction based on two different architectures, the first, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based bottleneck feature extraction and the second, Deep Neural Network (DNN) based bottleneck feature extraction. Both of CNN and DNN based bottleneck feature extraction network were trained for 200 epochs to perform a feature extraction task. The input of bottleneck network is the same as the output which is the preprocessed images. From the bottleneck network, after training, the layers after the bottleneck layer were cut-off and set the bottleneck layer as an output layer. The result of the bottleneck feature extraction is that it can reduce the dimension of the images from 4096 to 128 to be used as a feature vectors for a classification process. In the classification process, it was performed by Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with three fully-connected layers, and trained for 500 epochs. In order to evaluate the performance, the 10-flod cross-validation was applied to the networks. The result is that the CNN based bottleneck feature extraction performs a better performance than DNN based which are 99.54% and 98.91% respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信