在急性信托和其在NHS研究议程中的地位评估领先的研发护理作用

N. Browne, Ruth Harris, J. Hunt, D. Kelly, K. Kelley, S. Pearce, H. Plant, A. Richardson, J. Sitzia
{"title":"在急性信托和其在NHS研究议程中的地位评估领先的研发护理作用","authors":"N. Browne, Ruth Harris, J. Hunt, D. Kelly, K. Kelley, S. Pearce, H. Plant, A. Richardson, J. Sitzia","doi":"10.1177/136140960200700407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For over a decade, the need to develop a robust evidence base for nursing, midwifery and health visiting through research has been part of the UK government's R&D strategy. Progress has been slow and little is known about the organisational reality of the most recent strategies. This study aimed to investigate the nature of posts with named responsibilities to lead and develop nursing and midwifery research activity, based in acute NHS hospital trusts. Data were obtained through telephone interviews with directors of nursing services, and a postal survey of relevant staff. Fifty two people responsible for nursing and midwifery R&D were invited to complete the questionnaire, of whom 34 responded. The majority of trusts were able to name an individual responsible for leading nursing R&D, although the remit of the role varied considerably. The effectiveness of implementing any national research strategy is likely to be constrained by the lack of consistency regarding nursing research roles, a factor that may also be implicated in the lack of progress in securing a meaningful contribution to NHS research from nursing R&D.","PeriodicalId":177021,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Times Research","volume":"198 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assessment of lead R&D nursing roles in acute trusts and an evaluation of their status within the NHS research agenda\",\"authors\":\"N. Browne, Ruth Harris, J. Hunt, D. Kelly, K. Kelley, S. Pearce, H. Plant, A. Richardson, J. Sitzia\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/136140960200700407\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For over a decade, the need to develop a robust evidence base for nursing, midwifery and health visiting through research has been part of the UK government's R&D strategy. Progress has been slow and little is known about the organisational reality of the most recent strategies. This study aimed to investigate the nature of posts with named responsibilities to lead and develop nursing and midwifery research activity, based in acute NHS hospital trusts. Data were obtained through telephone interviews with directors of nursing services, and a postal survey of relevant staff. Fifty two people responsible for nursing and midwifery R&D were invited to complete the questionnaire, of whom 34 responded. The majority of trusts were able to name an individual responsible for leading nursing R&D, although the remit of the role varied considerably. The effectiveness of implementing any national research strategy is likely to be constrained by the lack of consistency regarding nursing research roles, a factor that may also be implicated in the lack of progress in securing a meaningful contribution to NHS research from nursing R&D.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Times Research\",\"volume\":\"198 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Times Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/136140960200700407\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Times Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/136140960200700407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

十多年来,通过研究为护理、助产和健康访问建立一个强有力的证据基础的需求一直是英国政府研发战略的一部分。进展缓慢,人们对最新战略的组织现实知之甚少。本研究旨在调查职务的性质与命名的责任,领导和发展护理和助产研究活动,基于急性NHS医院信托。数据通过电话采访护理服务主任和邮政调查相关工作人员获得。我们邀请了52名护理和助产研发人员完成问卷,其中34人回答了问卷。大多数信托基金都能说出一个负责领导护理研发的人,尽管这个角色的职权范围差别很大。实施任何国家研究战略的有效性都可能受到护理研究角色缺乏一致性的限制,这一因素也可能涉及在确保护理研发对NHS研究的有意义贡献方面缺乏进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An assessment of lead R&D nursing roles in acute trusts and an evaluation of their status within the NHS research agenda
For over a decade, the need to develop a robust evidence base for nursing, midwifery and health visiting through research has been part of the UK government's R&D strategy. Progress has been slow and little is known about the organisational reality of the most recent strategies. This study aimed to investigate the nature of posts with named responsibilities to lead and develop nursing and midwifery research activity, based in acute NHS hospital trusts. Data were obtained through telephone interviews with directors of nursing services, and a postal survey of relevant staff. Fifty two people responsible for nursing and midwifery R&D were invited to complete the questionnaire, of whom 34 responded. The majority of trusts were able to name an individual responsible for leading nursing R&D, although the remit of the role varied considerably. The effectiveness of implementing any national research strategy is likely to be constrained by the lack of consistency regarding nursing research roles, a factor that may also be implicated in the lack of progress in securing a meaningful contribution to NHS research from nursing R&D.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信