是时候掸去反退税法的灰尘了

Jamie Parson, David C. Marlett, Stuart Powell
{"title":"是时候掸去反退税法的灰尘了","authors":"Jamie Parson, David C. Marlett, Stuart Powell","doi":"10.52227/24149.2017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper evaluates the recent call for change or repeal of the current antirebate laws by reviewing the evolution of the anti-rebating statutes, evaluating the current application and exceptions to the laws and discussing the options in favor of and against repeal. The paper concludes with recommendations for those states considering change to current laws.","PeriodicalId":261634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Insurance Regulation","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time to dust off the anti-rebate laws\",\"authors\":\"Jamie Parson, David C. Marlett, Stuart Powell\",\"doi\":\"10.52227/24149.2017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper evaluates the recent call for change or repeal of the current antirebate laws by reviewing the evolution of the anti-rebating statutes, evaluating the current application and exceptions to the laws and discussing the options in favor of and against repeal. The paper concludes with recommendations for those states considering change to current laws.\",\"PeriodicalId\":261634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Insurance Regulation\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Insurance Regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52227/24149.2017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Insurance Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52227/24149.2017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过回顾反退税法规的演变,评估现行法律的适用和例外情况,并讨论赞成和反对废除现行反退税法的选择,来评估最近要求修改或废除现行反退税法的呼声。论文最后对那些考虑修改现行法律的州提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Time to dust off the anti-rebate laws
This paper evaluates the recent call for change or repeal of the current antirebate laws by reviewing the evolution of the anti-rebating statutes, evaluating the current application and exceptions to the laws and discussing the options in favor of and against repeal. The paper concludes with recommendations for those states considering change to current laws.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信