2016年美国总统竞选期间参与政治的用户行为特征

J. Caetano, J. Almeida, H. T. Marques-Neto
{"title":"2016年美国总统竞选期间参与政治的用户行为特征","authors":"J. Caetano, J. Almeida, H. T. Marques-Neto","doi":"10.1109/ASONAM.2018.8508459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political campaigns have frequently used the online social network as an important environment to exhibit the candidate ideas, their activities, and their electoral plans if elected. Some users are more politically engaged than others. As an example, we can observe intense political debates, especially during major campaigns on Twitter. In such context, this paper presents a characterization of politically engaged user groups on Twitter during the 2016 US Presidential Campaign. Using a rich dataset with 23 million tweets, 115 thousand user profiles and their contact network collected from January 2016 to November 2016, we identified four politically engaged user groups: advocates for both main candidates, political bots, and regular users. We present a characterization of how Twitter users behave during a political campaign through the language patterns analysis of tweets, which users receive more popularity during the campaign and how tweets from each candidate may have affected their mood variation, as expressed by the messages they share.","PeriodicalId":135949,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing Politically Engaged Users' Behavior During the 2016 US Presidential Campaign\",\"authors\":\"J. Caetano, J. Almeida, H. T. Marques-Neto\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASONAM.2018.8508459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Political campaigns have frequently used the online social network as an important environment to exhibit the candidate ideas, their activities, and their electoral plans if elected. Some users are more politically engaged than others. As an example, we can observe intense political debates, especially during major campaigns on Twitter. In such context, this paper presents a characterization of politically engaged user groups on Twitter during the 2016 US Presidential Campaign. Using a rich dataset with 23 million tweets, 115 thousand user profiles and their contact network collected from January 2016 to November 2016, we identified four politically engaged user groups: advocates for both main candidates, political bots, and regular users. We present a characterization of how Twitter users behave during a political campaign through the language patterns analysis of tweets, which users receive more popularity during the campaign and how tweets from each candidate may have affected their mood variation, as expressed by the messages they share.\",\"PeriodicalId\":135949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM)\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2018.8508459\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2018.8508459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

政治竞选经常使用在线社交网络作为重要的环境来展示候选人的想法,他们的活动,以及他们当选后的选举计划。一些用户比其他人更热衷于政治。例如,我们可以在Twitter上观察到激烈的政治辩论,尤其是在重大竞选期间。在这种背景下,本文提出了2016年美国总统竞选期间Twitter上政治参与用户群体的特征。利用从2016年1月到2016年11月收集的2300万条推文、11.5万个用户简介及其联系网络的丰富数据集,我们确定了四个参与政治的用户群体:主要候选人的倡导者、政治机器人和普通用户。我们通过对推文的语言模式分析来描述推特用户在政治竞选期间的行为,哪些用户在竞选期间更受欢迎,以及每个候选人的推文如何影响他们的情绪变化,正如他们分享的信息所表达的那样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterizing Politically Engaged Users' Behavior During the 2016 US Presidential Campaign
Political campaigns have frequently used the online social network as an important environment to exhibit the candidate ideas, their activities, and their electoral plans if elected. Some users are more politically engaged than others. As an example, we can observe intense political debates, especially during major campaigns on Twitter. In such context, this paper presents a characterization of politically engaged user groups on Twitter during the 2016 US Presidential Campaign. Using a rich dataset with 23 million tweets, 115 thousand user profiles and their contact network collected from January 2016 to November 2016, we identified four politically engaged user groups: advocates for both main candidates, political bots, and regular users. We present a characterization of how Twitter users behave during a political campaign through the language patterns analysis of tweets, which users receive more popularity during the campaign and how tweets from each candidate may have affected their mood variation, as expressed by the messages they share.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信