{"title":"新上海内幕有限公司商标申请","authors":"Appointed Person","doi":"10.1093/RPC/RCY030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"H1 Trade marks – Human Rights – Right to a fair hearing – Appeal to Appointed Person – Preliminary issue – Respondent represented by counsel who was also appointed to sit on such appeals – Appellant not consenting to such representation – Whether possibility of perceived bias – Whether informed consent by appellant necessary – Whether to refer to the High Court under s.76(3) of the Trade Marks Act 1994","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NEWSCO INSIDER LTD’S TRADE MARK APPLICATION\",\"authors\":\"Appointed Person\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/RPC/RCY030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"H1 Trade marks – Human Rights – Right to a fair hearing – Appeal to Appointed Person – Preliminary issue – Respondent represented by counsel who was also appointed to sit on such appeals – Appellant not consenting to such representation – Whether possibility of perceived bias – Whether informed consent by appellant necessary – Whether to refer to the High Court under s.76(3) of the Trade Marks Act 1994\",\"PeriodicalId\":336842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/RPC/RCY030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/RPC/RCY030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
H1 Trade marks – Human Rights – Right to a fair hearing – Appeal to Appointed Person – Preliminary issue – Respondent represented by counsel who was also appointed to sit on such appeals – Appellant not consenting to such representation – Whether possibility of perceived bias – Whether informed consent by appellant necessary – Whether to refer to the High Court under s.76(3) of the Trade Marks Act 1994
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
