Hryhorii skovoroda:形象的乌克兰化

V. Artiukh
{"title":"Hryhorii skovoroda:形象的乌克兰化","authors":"V. Artiukh","doi":"10.21272/starovyna.2022.60.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the article the attempt is made to study the perception of the XVIII century\nphilosopher Hryhorii Skovoroda’s image and its philosophy through the prism of the later national identities. The fact is stressed that the statement of the issue concerning the Hryhorii Skovoroda’s image Ukrainization and the history of its solution turns out to be the consequence of the process of establishing the Ukrainian modern self-identity which started in the ХІХ century. The situation is emphasized that within “all-Russian” identity one can come across its three variations: Skovoroda is a “Russian” (meaning “all-Russian”); Skovoroda is a “Malorussian” (meaning a representative of a regional variant of a “Russian” identity) and Skovoroda is a “Ukrainian” (meaning a native from the land that is called Ukraine). At the end of the ХІХ century Skovoroda’s image was interpreted within Ukrainian personal identity. The conclusion is made that during ХІХ-ХХ centuries and even nowadays two national identities for Skovoroda’s personality remain relevant: Ukrainian and Russian. The Russian one is a result of the XVIII-XIX centuries “all-Russian” syncretism state being transferred into the modern\nparticular Russian national self-identity. The process of Hryhorii Skovoroda’s image\nUkrainization (in other words its extraction from the “all-Russian” context) developed through several stages. At the beginning of the ХІХ century he was “Ukrainian” because he had a Ukrainian territorial identity and was related to Slobidska-Ukrainian province. Later he became “Ukrainian” because he represented “simple” Ukrainian people. Finally he is “Ukrainian” because he belongs to the Ukrainian ethnic nation and therefore his philosophy belongs to Ukrainian philosophical culture.","PeriodicalId":332840,"journal":{"name":"Sums'ka Starovyna (Ancient Sumy Land)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HRYHORII SKOVORODA: UKRAINIZATION OFTHE IMAGE\",\"authors\":\"V. Artiukh\",\"doi\":\"10.21272/starovyna.2022.60.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Within the article the attempt is made to study the perception of the XVIII century\\nphilosopher Hryhorii Skovoroda’s image and its philosophy through the prism of the later national identities. The fact is stressed that the statement of the issue concerning the Hryhorii Skovoroda’s image Ukrainization and the history of its solution turns out to be the consequence of the process of establishing the Ukrainian modern self-identity which started in the ХІХ century. The situation is emphasized that within “all-Russian” identity one can come across its three variations: Skovoroda is a “Russian” (meaning “all-Russian”); Skovoroda is a “Malorussian” (meaning a representative of a regional variant of a “Russian” identity) and Skovoroda is a “Ukrainian” (meaning a native from the land that is called Ukraine). At the end of the ХІХ century Skovoroda’s image was interpreted within Ukrainian personal identity. The conclusion is made that during ХІХ-ХХ centuries and even nowadays two national identities for Skovoroda’s personality remain relevant: Ukrainian and Russian. The Russian one is a result of the XVIII-XIX centuries “all-Russian” syncretism state being transferred into the modern\\nparticular Russian national self-identity. The process of Hryhorii Skovoroda’s image\\nUkrainization (in other words its extraction from the “all-Russian” context) developed through several stages. At the beginning of the ХІХ century he was “Ukrainian” because he had a Ukrainian territorial identity and was related to Slobidska-Ukrainian province. Later he became “Ukrainian” because he represented “simple” Ukrainian people. Finally he is “Ukrainian” because he belongs to the Ukrainian ethnic nation and therefore his philosophy belongs to Ukrainian philosophical culture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sums'ka Starovyna (Ancient Sumy Land)\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sums'ka Starovyna (Ancient Sumy Land)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21272/starovyna.2022.60.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sums'ka Starovyna (Ancient Sumy Land)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21272/starovyna.2022.60.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在本文中,试图通过后来的民族认同的棱镜来研究18世纪哲学家斯科沃罗达的形象及其哲学的感知。强调的事实是,关于赫里赫里·斯科沃罗达的形象、乌克兰化及其解决的历史问题的陈述,原来是在ХІХ世纪开始的建立乌克兰现代自我认同进程的结果。这种情况强调,在“全俄罗斯”身份中,人们可以遇到三种变体:斯科沃罗达是“俄罗斯人”(意思是“全俄罗斯人”);Skovoroda是“malorrusa”(意思是“俄罗斯”身份的一个地区变体的代表),Skovoroda是“乌克兰人”(意思是来自乌克兰的土地)。在ХІХ世纪末,斯科沃罗达的形象在乌克兰人的个人身份中得到了解释。结论是,在ХІХ-ХХ几个世纪甚至今天,Skovoroda的两个民族身份仍然是相关的:乌克兰和俄罗斯。俄罗斯是十八至十九世纪“全俄”融合国家转变为现代特殊的俄罗斯民族认同的结果。斯科沃罗达的形象乌克兰化(换句话说,它从“全俄罗斯”语境中提取出来)的过程经历了几个阶段。在ХІХ世纪初,他是“乌克兰人”,因为他有乌克兰领土身份,与斯洛比兹卡-乌克兰省有关。后来他成为了“乌克兰人”,因为他代表了“简单的”乌克兰人民。最后,他是“乌克兰人”,因为他属于乌克兰民族,因此他的哲学属于乌克兰哲学文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
HRYHORII SKOVORODA: UKRAINIZATION OFTHE IMAGE
Within the article the attempt is made to study the perception of the XVIII century philosopher Hryhorii Skovoroda’s image and its philosophy through the prism of the later national identities. The fact is stressed that the statement of the issue concerning the Hryhorii Skovoroda’s image Ukrainization and the history of its solution turns out to be the consequence of the process of establishing the Ukrainian modern self-identity which started in the ХІХ century. The situation is emphasized that within “all-Russian” identity one can come across its three variations: Skovoroda is a “Russian” (meaning “all-Russian”); Skovoroda is a “Malorussian” (meaning a representative of a regional variant of a “Russian” identity) and Skovoroda is a “Ukrainian” (meaning a native from the land that is called Ukraine). At the end of the ХІХ century Skovoroda’s image was interpreted within Ukrainian personal identity. The conclusion is made that during ХІХ-ХХ centuries and even nowadays two national identities for Skovoroda’s personality remain relevant: Ukrainian and Russian. The Russian one is a result of the XVIII-XIX centuries “all-Russian” syncretism state being transferred into the modern particular Russian national self-identity. The process of Hryhorii Skovoroda’s image Ukrainization (in other words its extraction from the “all-Russian” context) developed through several stages. At the beginning of the ХІХ century he was “Ukrainian” because he had a Ukrainian territorial identity and was related to Slobidska-Ukrainian province. Later he became “Ukrainian” because he represented “simple” Ukrainian people. Finally he is “Ukrainian” because he belongs to the Ukrainian ethnic nation and therefore his philosophy belongs to Ukrainian philosophical culture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信