N. Wakuta, R. Hara, T. Oyama, K. Okada, I. Kurihara
{"title":"双边电力交易中输电拥塞缓解技术的经济评价","authors":"N. Wakuta, R. Hara, T. Oyama, K. Okada, I. Kurihara","doi":"10.1109/CIGRE.2005.1532735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper quantitatively evaluated the performance and characteristics of three kinds of congestion relieving technique (TLR, ranking method and CC method) from the viewpoint of social welfare and congestion charge. The results confirmed that the CC method attains comparatively high social welfare as well as economic fairness in both the simple three-bus system and the IEEJ EAST 10-machine system. Administrative relieving methods might achieve congestion relief with higher social welfare than CC, however, the economic impacts imposed on market participant are unequal. That is, it is difficult to secure economic fairness by administrative methods. Furthermore, numerical studies revealed a negative correlation between total congestion costs and social welfare","PeriodicalId":414346,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium CIGRE/IEEE PES, 2005.","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economical assessment of transmission congestion relieving technique for bilateral electricity transaction\",\"authors\":\"N. Wakuta, R. Hara, T. Oyama, K. Okada, I. Kurihara\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CIGRE.2005.1532735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper quantitatively evaluated the performance and characteristics of three kinds of congestion relieving technique (TLR, ranking method and CC method) from the viewpoint of social welfare and congestion charge. The results confirmed that the CC method attains comparatively high social welfare as well as economic fairness in both the simple three-bus system and the IEEJ EAST 10-machine system. Administrative relieving methods might achieve congestion relief with higher social welfare than CC, however, the economic impacts imposed on market participant are unequal. That is, it is difficult to secure economic fairness by administrative methods. Furthermore, numerical studies revealed a negative correlation between total congestion costs and social welfare\",\"PeriodicalId\":414346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Symposium CIGRE/IEEE PES, 2005.\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Symposium CIGRE/IEEE PES, 2005.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIGRE.2005.1532735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium CIGRE/IEEE PES, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIGRE.2005.1532735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文从社会福利和拥堵收费的角度,定量评价了三种拥堵缓解技术(TLR法、排序法和CC法)的性能和特点。结果表明,CC法在简单三母线系统和IEEJ EAST 10机系统中均具有较高的社会福利和经济公平性。行政救济方式可能比行政救济方式获得更高的社会福利,但对市场参与者的经济影响是不平等的。也就是说,很难通过行政手段来确保经济公平。此外,数值研究揭示了总拥堵成本与社会福利之间的负相关关系
Economical assessment of transmission congestion relieving technique for bilateral electricity transaction
This paper quantitatively evaluated the performance and characteristics of three kinds of congestion relieving technique (TLR, ranking method and CC method) from the viewpoint of social welfare and congestion charge. The results confirmed that the CC method attains comparatively high social welfare as well as economic fairness in both the simple three-bus system and the IEEJ EAST 10-machine system. Administrative relieving methods might achieve congestion relief with higher social welfare than CC, however, the economic impacts imposed on market participant are unequal. That is, it is difficult to secure economic fairness by administrative methods. Furthermore, numerical studies revealed a negative correlation between total congestion costs and social welfare