银行企业的财务理论分析:以尼日利亚第一银行为例

Oluseun A. Paseda
{"title":"银行企业的财务理论分析:以尼日利亚第一银行为例","authors":"Oluseun A. Paseda","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2894342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Banks have been historically the most important kind of financial intermediaries. In Nigeria, they account for more than 60 percent of the market capitalization of quoted firms on the Nigerian Stock Exchange. Even though, there have been many well-known studies on the relationship between financial (services) development and economic growth, a micro-economic approach to the analysis of banks’ performance has almost been ignored to the detriment of the industry practitioners, potential investors and financial system supervisors. This study attempts a finance-theoretic performance analysis of First Bank of Nigeria along four dimensions namely: common ratios, CAMELS framework, Z-score and Black-Scholes option pricing frameworks. These four frameworks were shown to be mutually reinforcing in insights from the performance of First Bank in terms of capital adequacy, assets quality, management efficiency, earnings quality, liquidity, sensitivity to market risk and overall risk strategy of the bank. The option-theoretic framework that generates the time values of First Bank and a peer (Zenith Bank) rationalizes the distinction between the two banks’ overall risk appetite wherein the higher risk tolerant bank corresponds to a higher time value with consistent CAMELS metrics. The study recommends improved disclosures in published financial statements to aid investor and market discipline; strict enforcement of prudential regulations to check-mate excessive risk taking; prudential guidelines to provide appropriate incentives for banks’ portfolio choices across economic sectors; product and geographic diversification strategy by banks to minimize risk; provision of public infrastructure such as electricity and security to contain escalating bank overheads which threaten their operating efficiency.","PeriodicalId":274826,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Academic Accounting Association (CAAA)","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finance-Theoretic Analysis of a Banking-Firm: Case Study of First Bank of Nigeria PLC\",\"authors\":\"Oluseun A. Paseda\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2894342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Banks have been historically the most important kind of financial intermediaries. In Nigeria, they account for more than 60 percent of the market capitalization of quoted firms on the Nigerian Stock Exchange. Even though, there have been many well-known studies on the relationship between financial (services) development and economic growth, a micro-economic approach to the analysis of banks’ performance has almost been ignored to the detriment of the industry practitioners, potential investors and financial system supervisors. This study attempts a finance-theoretic performance analysis of First Bank of Nigeria along four dimensions namely: common ratios, CAMELS framework, Z-score and Black-Scholes option pricing frameworks. These four frameworks were shown to be mutually reinforcing in insights from the performance of First Bank in terms of capital adequacy, assets quality, management efficiency, earnings quality, liquidity, sensitivity to market risk and overall risk strategy of the bank. The option-theoretic framework that generates the time values of First Bank and a peer (Zenith Bank) rationalizes the distinction between the two banks’ overall risk appetite wherein the higher risk tolerant bank corresponds to a higher time value with consistent CAMELS metrics. The study recommends improved disclosures in published financial statements to aid investor and market discipline; strict enforcement of prudential regulations to check-mate excessive risk taking; prudential guidelines to provide appropriate incentives for banks’ portfolio choices across economic sectors; product and geographic diversification strategy by banks to minimize risk; provision of public infrastructure such as electricity and security to contain escalating bank overheads which threaten their operating efficiency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":274826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Academic Accounting Association (CAAA)\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Academic Accounting Association (CAAA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2894342\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Academic Accounting Association (CAAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2894342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

历史上,银行一直是最重要的金融中介机构。在尼日利亚,它们占尼日利亚证券交易所上市公司市值的60%以上。尽管有许多关于金融(服务业)发展与经济增长之间关系的知名研究,但从微观经济角度分析银行绩效的方法几乎被忽视了,这对行业从业者、潜在投资者和金融体系监管者都是不利的。本研究试图从四个维度对尼日利亚第一银行的财务理论绩效进行分析:共同比率、camel框架、Z-score和Black-Scholes期权定价框架。从第一银行在资本充足率、资产质量、管理效率、盈利质量、流动性、对市场风险的敏感性和银行整体风险策略方面的表现来看,这四个框架是相互加强的。产生第一银行和同行(Zenith Bank)时间值的期权理论框架合理化了两家银行整体风险偏好之间的区别,其中风险承受能力较高的银行对应于具有一致camel指标的较高时间值。该研究建议改善已公布财务报表的披露,以帮助投资者和市场纪律;严格执行审慎监管,遏制过度冒险行为;为银行在各个经济部门的投资组合选择提供适当激励的审慎指导方针;银行为降低风险而采取的产品和地域多样化策略;提供公共基础设施,如电力和安全,以控制不断上升的银行管理费用,从而威胁其运营效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Finance-Theoretic Analysis of a Banking-Firm: Case Study of First Bank of Nigeria PLC
Banks have been historically the most important kind of financial intermediaries. In Nigeria, they account for more than 60 percent of the market capitalization of quoted firms on the Nigerian Stock Exchange. Even though, there have been many well-known studies on the relationship between financial (services) development and economic growth, a micro-economic approach to the analysis of banks’ performance has almost been ignored to the detriment of the industry practitioners, potential investors and financial system supervisors. This study attempts a finance-theoretic performance analysis of First Bank of Nigeria along four dimensions namely: common ratios, CAMELS framework, Z-score and Black-Scholes option pricing frameworks. These four frameworks were shown to be mutually reinforcing in insights from the performance of First Bank in terms of capital adequacy, assets quality, management efficiency, earnings quality, liquidity, sensitivity to market risk and overall risk strategy of the bank. The option-theoretic framework that generates the time values of First Bank and a peer (Zenith Bank) rationalizes the distinction between the two banks’ overall risk appetite wherein the higher risk tolerant bank corresponds to a higher time value with consistent CAMELS metrics. The study recommends improved disclosures in published financial statements to aid investor and market discipline; strict enforcement of prudential regulations to check-mate excessive risk taking; prudential guidelines to provide appropriate incentives for banks’ portfolio choices across economic sectors; product and geographic diversification strategy by banks to minimize risk; provision of public infrastructure such as electricity and security to contain escalating bank overheads which threaten their operating efficiency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信