如何扩展清单范式以反映多值逻辑连接词的不同状态

N. Hallam, H. Essalam
{"title":"如何扩展清单范式以反映多值逻辑连接词的不同状态","authors":"N. Hallam, H. Essalam","doi":"10.1109/NAFIPS.1999.781650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bandler and Kohout's (1980) pattern of inference is based on relational products (relational compositions), and can be seen as a framework of approximate reasoning of two theoretical facets. One is a set of fuzzy relational inference structures which are nothing but deductive rules. The other, being a theoretical paradigm, namely the checklist paradigm, copes with the traditional problem of choosing among a panoply of fuzzy logic connectives which are used to evaluate the inference structures.","PeriodicalId":335957,"journal":{"name":"18th International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society - NAFIPS (Cat. No.99TH8397)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How the checklist paradigm can be extended to reflect different states of multivalued logical connectives\",\"authors\":\"N. Hallam, H. Essalam\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NAFIPS.1999.781650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bandler and Kohout's (1980) pattern of inference is based on relational products (relational compositions), and can be seen as a framework of approximate reasoning of two theoretical facets. One is a set of fuzzy relational inference structures which are nothing but deductive rules. The other, being a theoretical paradigm, namely the checklist paradigm, copes with the traditional problem of choosing among a panoply of fuzzy logic connectives which are used to evaluate the inference structures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":335957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"18th International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society - NAFIPS (Cat. No.99TH8397)\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"18th International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society - NAFIPS (Cat. No.99TH8397)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAFIPS.1999.781650\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"18th International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society - NAFIPS (Cat. No.99TH8397)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAFIPS.1999.781650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Bandler和Kohout(1980)的推理模式基于关系产品(关系组合),可以看作是两个理论方面的近似推理框架。一种是一组模糊关系推理结构,这些结构只不过是演绎规则。另一种是理论范式,即检查表范式,它解决了在一堆模糊逻辑连接词中进行选择的传统问题,这些连接词用于评估推理结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How the checklist paradigm can be extended to reflect different states of multivalued logical connectives
Bandler and Kohout's (1980) pattern of inference is based on relational products (relational compositions), and can be seen as a framework of approximate reasoning of two theoretical facets. One is a set of fuzzy relational inference structures which are nothing but deductive rules. The other, being a theoretical paradigm, namely the checklist paradigm, copes with the traditional problem of choosing among a panoply of fuzzy logic connectives which are used to evaluate the inference structures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信