Český lid Pub Date : 2021-06-25 DOI:10.21104/cl.2021.2.03
Tomá ² Ledvinka
{"title":"Právní etnografie a „právo a etnografie“. Dva přístupy k etnografickému výzkumu práva","authors":"Tomá ² Ledvinka","doi":"10.21104/cl.2021.2.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Until recently, legal ethnography has been understood as an integral part of legal anthropology and its studies of law in particular societies and cultures. In some older national traditions of European legal ethnology, including the Czech tradition, it has been considered a legal rather than a social science. Recent shifts in the perception of ethnography, which is increasingly understood as an autonomous methodology or a technology of knowledge production, are an opportunity to re-think the specific position of legal ethnography. This paper therefore explores the difference between ethnography as it is understood in the anthropology of law and the new relationship of “law and ethnography” as two autonomous variables. On the basis of several recent legal-ethnographic studies, it also seeks to identify the persistent common denominators of both approaches and attempts to show their possible contribution to the traditional methodology of legal research.","PeriodicalId":250055,"journal":{"name":"Český lid","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Český lid","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21104/cl.2021.2.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直到最近,法律民族志一直被理解为法律人类学及其在特定社会和文化中的法律研究的一个组成部分。在欧洲法律民族学的一些较老的民族传统中,包括捷克传统,它被认为是一门法律科学而不是一门社会科学。民族志越来越被理解为一种自主的方法论或一种知识生产技术,最近对民族志的看法发生了转变,这是重新思考法律民族志具体地位的机会。因此,本文探讨了法律人类学中所理解的民族志与作为两个自主变量的“法律与民族志”的新关系之间的区别。在最近几项法律人种学研究的基础上,它还试图确定这两种方法的持久共同点,并试图表明它们对传统法律研究方法的可能贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Právní etnografie a „právo a etnografie“. Dva přístupy k etnografickému výzkumu práva
Until recently, legal ethnography has been understood as an integral part of legal anthropology and its studies of law in particular societies and cultures. In some older national traditions of European legal ethnology, including the Czech tradition, it has been considered a legal rather than a social science. Recent shifts in the perception of ethnography, which is increasingly understood as an autonomous methodology or a technology of knowledge production, are an opportunity to re-think the specific position of legal ethnography. This paper therefore explores the difference between ethnography as it is understood in the anthropology of law and the new relationship of “law and ethnography” as two autonomous variables. On the basis of several recent legal-ethnographic studies, it also seeks to identify the persistent common denominators of both approaches and attempts to show their possible contribution to the traditional methodology of legal research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信