用于扫描路径比较的度量的鲁棒性

F. Děchtěrenko, J. Lukavský
{"title":"用于扫描路径比较的度量的鲁棒性","authors":"F. Děchtěrenko, J. Lukavský","doi":"10.1145/3204493.3204580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In every quantitative eye tracking research study, researchers need to compare eye movements between subjects or conditions. For both static and dynamic tasks, there is a variety of metrics that could serve this purpose. It is important to explore the robustness of the metrics with respect to artificial noise. For dynamic tasks, where eye movement data is represented as scanpaths, there are currently no studies regarding the robustness of the metrics. In this study, we explored properties of five metrics (Levenshtein distance, correlation distance, Fréchet distance, mean and median distance) used for comparison of scanpaths. We systematically added noise by applying three transformations to the scanpaths: translation, rotation, and scaling. For each metric, we computed baseline similarity for two random scanpaths and explored the metrics' sensitivity. Our results allow other researchers to convert results between studies.","PeriodicalId":237808,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications","volume":"286 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robustness of metrics used for scanpath comparison\",\"authors\":\"F. Děchtěrenko, J. Lukavský\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3204493.3204580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In every quantitative eye tracking research study, researchers need to compare eye movements between subjects or conditions. For both static and dynamic tasks, there is a variety of metrics that could serve this purpose. It is important to explore the robustness of the metrics with respect to artificial noise. For dynamic tasks, where eye movement data is represented as scanpaths, there are currently no studies regarding the robustness of the metrics. In this study, we explored properties of five metrics (Levenshtein distance, correlation distance, Fréchet distance, mean and median distance) used for comparison of scanpaths. We systematically added noise by applying three transformations to the scanpaths: translation, rotation, and scaling. For each metric, we computed baseline similarity for two random scanpaths and explored the metrics' sensitivity. Our results allow other researchers to convert results between studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":237808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications\",\"volume\":\"286 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3204493.3204580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3204493.3204580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在每一项定量眼动追踪研究中,研究人员都需要比较不同受试者或不同条件下的眼动。对于静态和动态任务,有各种各样的指标可以达到这个目的。探讨指标相对于人工噪声的鲁棒性是很重要的。对于动态任务,眼动数据被表示为扫描路径,目前还没有关于指标鲁棒性的研究。在本研究中,我们探讨了用于扫描路径比较的五个度量(Levenshtein距离、相关距离、fr距离、平均和中位数距离)的性质。我们通过对扫描路径应用三种变换来系统地添加噪声:平移、旋转和缩放。对于每个指标,我们计算了两个随机扫描路径的基线相似性,并探讨了指标的敏感性。我们的研究结果允许其他研究人员在研究之间转换结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robustness of metrics used for scanpath comparison
In every quantitative eye tracking research study, researchers need to compare eye movements between subjects or conditions. For both static and dynamic tasks, there is a variety of metrics that could serve this purpose. It is important to explore the robustness of the metrics with respect to artificial noise. For dynamic tasks, where eye movement data is represented as scanpaths, there are currently no studies regarding the robustness of the metrics. In this study, we explored properties of five metrics (Levenshtein distance, correlation distance, Fréchet distance, mean and median distance) used for comparison of scanpaths. We systematically added noise by applying three transformations to the scanpaths: translation, rotation, and scaling. For each metric, we computed baseline similarity for two random scanpaths and explored the metrics' sensitivity. Our results allow other researchers to convert results between studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信