当前莱布尼茨奖学金的三个案例研究

M. Katz, Karl Kuhlemann, David Sherry, Monica Ugaglia
{"title":"当前莱布尼茨奖学金的三个案例研究","authors":"M. Katz, Karl Kuhlemann, David Sherry, Monica Ugaglia","doi":"10.14708/am.v15i1.7087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine some recent scholarship on Leibniz’s philosophy of the infinitesimal calculus. We indicate difficulties that arise in articles by Bassler, Knobloch, and Arthur, due to a denial to Leibniz’s infinitesimals of the status of mathematical entities violating Euclid V Definition 4.","PeriodicalId":165989,"journal":{"name":"Antiquitates Mathematicae","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three case studies in current Leibniz scholarship\",\"authors\":\"M. Katz, Karl Kuhlemann, David Sherry, Monica Ugaglia\",\"doi\":\"10.14708/am.v15i1.7087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We examine some recent scholarship on Leibniz’s philosophy of the infinitesimal calculus. We indicate difficulties that arise in articles by Bassler, Knobloch, and Arthur, due to a denial to Leibniz’s infinitesimals of the status of mathematical entities violating Euclid V Definition 4.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antiquitates Mathematicae\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antiquitates Mathematicae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14708/am.v15i1.7087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antiquitates Mathematicae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14708/am.v15i1.7087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们考察了一些关于莱布尼茨的无限小微积分哲学的最新研究。我们指出在Bassler, Knobloch和Arthur的文章中出现的困难,由于否认莱布尼茨的数学实体的无限小状态违反欧几里得V定义4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Three case studies in current Leibniz scholarship
We examine some recent scholarship on Leibniz’s philosophy of the infinitesimal calculus. We indicate difficulties that arise in articles by Bassler, Knobloch, and Arthur, due to a denial to Leibniz’s infinitesimals of the status of mathematical entities violating Euclid V Definition 4.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信