双重圣职轨道:男女神职人员的不同收益和成本

P. Nesbitt
{"title":"双重圣职轨道:男女神职人员的不同收益和成本","authors":"P. Nesbitt","doi":"10.2307/3711839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although some religious organizations have had a sequential, two-ordination process for clergy, the implementation of two or more discrete ordination tracks is a recent development. In research on careers of 1,158 male and female clergy in two denominations that have instituted discrete ordination tracks - the Episcopal Church and the Unitarian Universalist Association - a similar relationship appeared between these newer ordination tracks and growing pressure toward clergy occupational feminization. The more recent tracks were sex-segregated, and there was evidence of occupational conflation between female clergy in both tracks that did not occur with the male clergy. The evidence suggests that dual ordination tracks may serve a dual utility, not only as an occupatioal response to socioeconomic changes within religious organizations but also to occupational feminization, in a manner that disproportionately concentrates male clergy in high-level positions. Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibiting discrimination based on sex has been critical to helping women gain legitimate opportunities in male-dominant occupations, but the First Amendment-based separation of church and state exempts one profession that women have sought to enter in substantially increased numbers since the 1960s: the ordained ministry. Several religious organizations have instituted affirmative action policies for minority and women clergy, but their efficacy has been problematic due to their voluntary nature, their tendency to focus on entry rather than upper-level placements, and the development of other occupational processes that can inadvertently undermine good intentions. One such occupational process, which is the subject of this research, involves segregation in clergy jobs and duties through the development of discrete ordination tracks. Although this process occurs only in some mainline religious organizations, others have been giving it serious consideration. With job segregation normally being the primary means of achieving occupational discrimination (Treiman and Hartmann, 1981), this study will suggest that the expansion of ordination tracking has substantial gender-related effects, with potentially discriminatory outcomes for careers of women clergy.","PeriodicalId":301546,"journal":{"name":"Gender and Religion","volume":"323 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual Ordination Tracks: Differential Benefits and Costs for Men and Women Clergy\",\"authors\":\"P. Nesbitt\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/3711839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although some religious organizations have had a sequential, two-ordination process for clergy, the implementation of two or more discrete ordination tracks is a recent development. In research on careers of 1,158 male and female clergy in two denominations that have instituted discrete ordination tracks - the Episcopal Church and the Unitarian Universalist Association - a similar relationship appeared between these newer ordination tracks and growing pressure toward clergy occupational feminization. The more recent tracks were sex-segregated, and there was evidence of occupational conflation between female clergy in both tracks that did not occur with the male clergy. The evidence suggests that dual ordination tracks may serve a dual utility, not only as an occupatioal response to socioeconomic changes within religious organizations but also to occupational feminization, in a manner that disproportionately concentrates male clergy in high-level positions. Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibiting discrimination based on sex has been critical to helping women gain legitimate opportunities in male-dominant occupations, but the First Amendment-based separation of church and state exempts one profession that women have sought to enter in substantially increased numbers since the 1960s: the ordained ministry. Several religious organizations have instituted affirmative action policies for minority and women clergy, but their efficacy has been problematic due to their voluntary nature, their tendency to focus on entry rather than upper-level placements, and the development of other occupational processes that can inadvertently undermine good intentions. One such occupational process, which is the subject of this research, involves segregation in clergy jobs and duties through the development of discrete ordination tracks. Although this process occurs only in some mainline religious organizations, others have been giving it serious consideration. With job segregation normally being the primary means of achieving occupational discrimination (Treiman and Hartmann, 1981), this study will suggest that the expansion of ordination tracking has substantial gender-related effects, with potentially discriminatory outcomes for careers of women clergy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":301546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender and Religion\",\"volume\":\"323 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender and Religion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/3711839\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender and Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3711839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

虽然一些宗教组织对神职人员有一个连续的、两次的圣职程序,但实施两个或多个离散的圣职轨道是最近的发展。在对两个教派的1158名男女神职人员的职业生涯进行的研究中,这两个教派已经建立了独立的圣公会和一神论普世主义协会,在这些新的圣公会和神职人员职业女性化日益增长的压力之间出现了类似的关系。最近的研究是性别隔离的,有证据表明,女性神职人员在两种研究中都存在职业混淆,而男性神职人员则没有。证据表明,双重任命轨道可能具有双重效用,不仅是对宗教组织内部社会经济变化的职业反应,也是对职业女性化的反应,以一种不成比例地将男性神职人员集中在高级职位上的方式。1964年《民权法案》(Civil Rights Act)禁止性别歧视的第七章,对于帮助女性在男性占主导地位的职业中获得合法机会至关重要,但基于《第一修正案》的政教分离规定,排除了一个职业,自20世纪60年代以来,越来越多的女性寻求进入这个职业:牧师。一些宗教组织已经为少数民族和女性神职人员制定了平权行动政策,但由于其自愿性质,倾向于关注入门而不是高层安置,以及其他职业过程的发展可能会无意中破坏良好的意图,这些政策的效力一直存在问题。一个这样的职业过程,这是本研究的主题,涉及神职人员的工作和职责的隔离,通过发展离散的任命轨道。虽然这一过程只发生在一些主流宗教组织中,但其他宗教组织一直在认真考虑这一问题。由于工作隔离通常是实现职业歧视的主要手段(Treiman和Hartmann, 1981),本研究将表明,圣职追踪的扩大具有实质性的性别相关影响,可能对女性神职人员的职业产生歧视性结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dual Ordination Tracks: Differential Benefits and Costs for Men and Women Clergy
Although some religious organizations have had a sequential, two-ordination process for clergy, the implementation of two or more discrete ordination tracks is a recent development. In research on careers of 1,158 male and female clergy in two denominations that have instituted discrete ordination tracks - the Episcopal Church and the Unitarian Universalist Association - a similar relationship appeared between these newer ordination tracks and growing pressure toward clergy occupational feminization. The more recent tracks were sex-segregated, and there was evidence of occupational conflation between female clergy in both tracks that did not occur with the male clergy. The evidence suggests that dual ordination tracks may serve a dual utility, not only as an occupatioal response to socioeconomic changes within religious organizations but also to occupational feminization, in a manner that disproportionately concentrates male clergy in high-level positions. Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibiting discrimination based on sex has been critical to helping women gain legitimate opportunities in male-dominant occupations, but the First Amendment-based separation of church and state exempts one profession that women have sought to enter in substantially increased numbers since the 1960s: the ordained ministry. Several religious organizations have instituted affirmative action policies for minority and women clergy, but their efficacy has been problematic due to their voluntary nature, their tendency to focus on entry rather than upper-level placements, and the development of other occupational processes that can inadvertently undermine good intentions. One such occupational process, which is the subject of this research, involves segregation in clergy jobs and duties through the development of discrete ordination tracks. Although this process occurs only in some mainline religious organizations, others have been giving it serious consideration. With job segregation normally being the primary means of achieving occupational discrimination (Treiman and Hartmann, 1981), this study will suggest that the expansion of ordination tracking has substantial gender-related effects, with potentially discriminatory outcomes for careers of women clergy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信