新政府,新机会,以及获得精神卫生保健的老问题

D. Gratzer, D. Goldbloom
{"title":"新政府,新机会,以及获得精神卫生保健的老问题","authors":"D. Gratzer, D. Goldbloom","doi":"10.1177/0706743716669084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For those concerned about access to mental health services, the present moment in politics holds promise. A federal Liberal government has been elected promising to address mental health access issues, a commitment recently reaffirmed by the Minister of Health. In Ottawa, bettering mental health care is nonpartisan: in the last election, every major political party promised action on improving services (unprecedented in federal campaigns); in the last Parliament, all parties supported a national suicide strategy. Good news is frankly welcome news. The interest is there and the need is great: 1 in 5 Canadians experiences a mental health problem in any given year, and they face a patchwork of care; many Ontarians have their first contact with the mental health system through the emergency room (roughly 1 in 3 with an anxiety disorder), according to a newly released Health Quality Ontario–Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (HQO-ICES) report. Access is problematic—especially if the bar is raised to the standard of access to evidence-based care. Consider recent articles published in this journal:","PeriodicalId":309115,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Government, New Opportunity, and an Old Problem with Access to Mental Health Care\",\"authors\":\"D. Gratzer, D. Goldbloom\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0706743716669084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For those concerned about access to mental health services, the present moment in politics holds promise. A federal Liberal government has been elected promising to address mental health access issues, a commitment recently reaffirmed by the Minister of Health. In Ottawa, bettering mental health care is nonpartisan: in the last election, every major political party promised action on improving services (unprecedented in federal campaigns); in the last Parliament, all parties supported a national suicide strategy. Good news is frankly welcome news. The interest is there and the need is great: 1 in 5 Canadians experiences a mental health problem in any given year, and they face a patchwork of care; many Ontarians have their first contact with the mental health system through the emergency room (roughly 1 in 3 with an anxiety disorder), according to a newly released Health Quality Ontario–Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (HQO-ICES) report. Access is problematic—especially if the bar is raised to the standard of access to evidence-based care. Consider recent articles published in this journal:\",\"PeriodicalId\":309115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743716669084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743716669084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

对于那些关心获得精神卫生服务的人来说,当前的政治形势带来了希望。当选的联邦自由党政府承诺解决获得精神卫生服务的问题,卫生部长最近重申了这一承诺。在渥太华,改善精神卫生保健是不分党派的:在上次选举中,每个主要政党都承诺采取行动改善服务(在联邦竞选中前所未有);在上届议会中,所有政党都支持一项国家自杀战略。坦白说,好消息是受欢迎的消息。人们对此很感兴趣,需求也很大:每年有五分之一的加拿大人经历过心理健康问题,他们面临着各种各样的护理;根据安大略省临床评估科学研究所(HQO-ICES)新发布的一份报告,许多安大略省人是通过急诊室第一次接触精神卫生系统的(大约三分之一的人患有焦虑症)。获取是有问题的——尤其是当获得循证护理的门槛提高到标准时。看看最近发表在该杂志上的文章:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New Government, New Opportunity, and an Old Problem with Access to Mental Health Care
For those concerned about access to mental health services, the present moment in politics holds promise. A federal Liberal government has been elected promising to address mental health access issues, a commitment recently reaffirmed by the Minister of Health. In Ottawa, bettering mental health care is nonpartisan: in the last election, every major political party promised action on improving services (unprecedented in federal campaigns); in the last Parliament, all parties supported a national suicide strategy. Good news is frankly welcome news. The interest is there and the need is great: 1 in 5 Canadians experiences a mental health problem in any given year, and they face a patchwork of care; many Ontarians have their first contact with the mental health system through the emergency room (roughly 1 in 3 with an anxiety disorder), according to a newly released Health Quality Ontario–Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (HQO-ICES) report. Access is problematic—especially if the bar is raised to the standard of access to evidence-based care. Consider recent articles published in this journal:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信