动作语义的使用

P. Mosses, D. Watt
{"title":"动作语义的使用","authors":"P. Mosses, D. Watt","doi":"10.7146/DPB.V15I217.7568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Formal descriptions of semantics have so far failed to match the acceptance and popularity of formal descriptions of syntax. Thus, in current standards for programming languages, syntax is usually described formally but semantics informally, despite the greater danger of impreciseness in the description of semantics. Possible reasons for this state of affairs are discussed. Action Semantics, which has been developed from Denotational Semantics and Abstract Semantic Algebras, has some features that may make it more attractive than other semantic formalisms. This paper describes and motivates Action Semantics, and gives some realistic examples of its use.","PeriodicalId":432086,"journal":{"name":"Formal Description of Programming Concepts","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"65","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of action semantics\",\"authors\":\"P. Mosses, D. Watt\",\"doi\":\"10.7146/DPB.V15I217.7568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Formal descriptions of semantics have so far failed to match the acceptance and popularity of formal descriptions of syntax. Thus, in current standards for programming languages, syntax is usually described formally but semantics informally, despite the greater danger of impreciseness in the description of semantics. Possible reasons for this state of affairs are discussed. Action Semantics, which has been developed from Denotational Semantics and Abstract Semantic Algebras, has some features that may make it more attractive than other semantic formalisms. This paper describes and motivates Action Semantics, and gives some realistic examples of its use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Formal Description of Programming Concepts\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"65\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Formal Description of Programming Concepts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7146/DPB.V15I217.7568\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formal Description of Programming Concepts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/DPB.V15I217.7568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 65

摘要

到目前为止,语义的形式描述还不能与语法的形式描述相匹配。因此,在当前的编程语言标准中,语法通常是正式的,而语义是非正式的,尽管语义描述不精确的危险更大。讨论了造成这种状况的可能原因。动作语义学是由指称语义学和抽象语义代数发展而来的,它有一些特征使它比其他语义形式更有吸引力。本文对动作语义进行了描述和激励,并给出了一些实际的使用实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The use of action semantics
Formal descriptions of semantics have so far failed to match the acceptance and popularity of formal descriptions of syntax. Thus, in current standards for programming languages, syntax is usually described formally but semantics informally, despite the greater danger of impreciseness in the description of semantics. Possible reasons for this state of affairs are discussed. Action Semantics, which has been developed from Denotational Semantics and Abstract Semantic Algebras, has some features that may make it more attractive than other semantic formalisms. This paper describes and motivates Action Semantics, and gives some realistic examples of its use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信