《潘趣》杂志女性写作中的性别、匿名和幽默

K. Birch
{"title":"《潘趣》杂志女性写作中的性别、匿名和幽默","authors":"K. Birch","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474433907.003.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Where existing scholarship on anonymity tends to focus on its liberating effects for women who wrote on ‘serious’ (masculine) subject matter, in this essay Katy Birch considers the transgressive possibilities that the obfuscation of identity created for female humourists. The female contributors to Punch (1841–2002) discussed in this essay are shown to have harnessed the practice of anonymity in order to circumvent the gendered dictates of comic journalism. In the contributions of May Kendall (1861–1943), for example, we see the deconstruction of the masculine triptych of science, humour, and brotherhood through the strategic deployment of anonymity, which accorded Kendall and other female humourists the authority to move beyond the social limitations imposed on them by their gender. Yet as Birch cautions, women writers’ use of the anonymous voice ultimately both imprisoned and emancipated them, not only in the sense that the practice ‘prevented these writers from receiving recognition for their work’ but also because anonymity did nothing ‘to combat the societal prejudice against female-authored comedy’ (p. 362).","PeriodicalId":174109,"journal":{"name":"Women, Periodicals and Print Culture in Britain, 1830s-1900s","volume":"229 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender, Anonymity, and Humour in Women’s Writing for Punch\",\"authors\":\"K. Birch\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474433907.003.0022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Where existing scholarship on anonymity tends to focus on its liberating effects for women who wrote on ‘serious’ (masculine) subject matter, in this essay Katy Birch considers the transgressive possibilities that the obfuscation of identity created for female humourists. The female contributors to Punch (1841–2002) discussed in this essay are shown to have harnessed the practice of anonymity in order to circumvent the gendered dictates of comic journalism. In the contributions of May Kendall (1861–1943), for example, we see the deconstruction of the masculine triptych of science, humour, and brotherhood through the strategic deployment of anonymity, which accorded Kendall and other female humourists the authority to move beyond the social limitations imposed on them by their gender. Yet as Birch cautions, women writers’ use of the anonymous voice ultimately both imprisoned and emancipated them, not only in the sense that the practice ‘prevented these writers from receiving recognition for their work’ but also because anonymity did nothing ‘to combat the societal prejudice against female-authored comedy’ (p. 362).\",\"PeriodicalId\":174109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women, Periodicals and Print Culture in Britain, 1830s-1900s\",\"volume\":\"229 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women, Periodicals and Print Culture in Britain, 1830s-1900s\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474433907.003.0022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women, Periodicals and Print Culture in Britain, 1830s-1900s","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474433907.003.0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

现有的关于匿名的学术研究倾向于关注它对那些写“严肃”(男性)题材的女性的解放作用,而在这篇文章中,凯蒂·伯奇(Katy Birch)考虑了身份混淆给女性幽默作家带来的越界可能性。在这篇文章中讨论的Punch(1841-2002)的女性撰稿人被证明利用了匿名的做法,以规避漫画新闻的性别要求。例如,在梅·肯德尔(May Kendall, 1861-1943)的作品中,我们看到了通过匿名的战略性部署,解构了科学、幽默和兄弟情谊的男性三联画,这赋予了肯德尔和其他女性幽默作家超越性别强加给她们的社会限制的权威。然而,正如伯奇警告的那样,女性作家使用匿名的声音最终既束缚了她们,也解放了她们,不仅因为这种做法“阻止了这些作家的作品得到认可”,而且因为匿名无助于“对抗社会对女性创作喜剧的偏见”(第362页)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender, Anonymity, and Humour in Women’s Writing for Punch
Where existing scholarship on anonymity tends to focus on its liberating effects for women who wrote on ‘serious’ (masculine) subject matter, in this essay Katy Birch considers the transgressive possibilities that the obfuscation of identity created for female humourists. The female contributors to Punch (1841–2002) discussed in this essay are shown to have harnessed the practice of anonymity in order to circumvent the gendered dictates of comic journalism. In the contributions of May Kendall (1861–1943), for example, we see the deconstruction of the masculine triptych of science, humour, and brotherhood through the strategic deployment of anonymity, which accorded Kendall and other female humourists the authority to move beyond the social limitations imposed on them by their gender. Yet as Birch cautions, women writers’ use of the anonymous voice ultimately both imprisoned and emancipated them, not only in the sense that the practice ‘prevented these writers from receiving recognition for their work’ but also because anonymity did nothing ‘to combat the societal prejudice against female-authored comedy’ (p. 362).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信