生父母与养父母之间的儿童保育权的确定

Nur Fatin Adila Binti Idereh
{"title":"生父母与养父母之间的儿童保育权的确定","authors":"Nur Fatin Adila Binti Idereh","doi":"10.22373/hadhanah.v3i2.2750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adoption of children is regulated in the Deed of Registration of Appointment 1952 (Deed 253) for Muslims and non-Muslims and the Deed of Adoption 1952 (Deed 257) for non-Muslims. Among the cases involving the struggle for custody is the one that occurred at the Pahang Sharia High Court, in which the judge handed over a child to his biological parents while the child had been registered under the Deed of Registration of Appointment 1952 (Deed 253). Then, in the case at the Selangor High Court, the judge handed over custody rights to the adoptive parents while the adoption registration was invalid. There are two formulations of the problem in this thesis. Firstly, what are the considerations of the Pahang Sharia High Court judges in determining child custody between biological parents and adoptive parents? Second, what are the considerations of the judges of the Selangor High Court in determining child custody between biological parents and adoptive parents? This research uses the juridical-normative method and case studies. Data collection is also done with literature and documentation. The results of the study show that first, the consideration of the judges of the Pahang Sharia High Court in determining child custody of their biological parents is because the judge looks at their efforts to get their child back and they have full rights to the child. Second, the consideration of the judge of the Selangor High Court in determining child custody of the adoptive parents is important because the judge stated that the main thing is what is best for the child, and the child's biological parents also have several obstacles to looking after the child. Custody is closely related to the interests of the child and the guardians, if there is an imbalance in custody, then the rights and interests of the child need to take precedence over the interests of the guardians.","PeriodicalId":179875,"journal":{"name":"El-Hadhanah : Indonesian Journal Of Family Law And Islamic Law","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination Of Child Care Rights Between Birthday Parents And Adopting Parents\",\"authors\":\"Nur Fatin Adila Binti Idereh\",\"doi\":\"10.22373/hadhanah.v3i2.2750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Adoption of children is regulated in the Deed of Registration of Appointment 1952 (Deed 253) for Muslims and non-Muslims and the Deed of Adoption 1952 (Deed 257) for non-Muslims. Among the cases involving the struggle for custody is the one that occurred at the Pahang Sharia High Court, in which the judge handed over a child to his biological parents while the child had been registered under the Deed of Registration of Appointment 1952 (Deed 253). Then, in the case at the Selangor High Court, the judge handed over custody rights to the adoptive parents while the adoption registration was invalid. There are two formulations of the problem in this thesis. Firstly, what are the considerations of the Pahang Sharia High Court judges in determining child custody between biological parents and adoptive parents? Second, what are the considerations of the judges of the Selangor High Court in determining child custody between biological parents and adoptive parents? This research uses the juridical-normative method and case studies. Data collection is also done with literature and documentation. The results of the study show that first, the consideration of the judges of the Pahang Sharia High Court in determining child custody of their biological parents is because the judge looks at their efforts to get their child back and they have full rights to the child. Second, the consideration of the judge of the Selangor High Court in determining child custody of the adoptive parents is important because the judge stated that the main thing is what is best for the child, and the child's biological parents also have several obstacles to looking after the child. Custody is closely related to the interests of the child and the guardians, if there is an imbalance in custody, then the rights and interests of the child need to take precedence over the interests of the guardians.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"El-Hadhanah : Indonesian Journal Of Family Law And Islamic Law\",\"volume\":\"119 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"El-Hadhanah : Indonesian Journal Of Family Law And Islamic Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22373/hadhanah.v3i2.2750\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"El-Hadhanah : Indonesian Journal Of Family Law And Islamic Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22373/hadhanah.v3i2.2750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

穆斯林和非穆斯林的1952年委任登记契据(契据253)和非穆斯林的1952年收养契据(契据257)规定了儿童的收养。在涉及争夺监护权的案件中,有一起发生在彭亨伊斯兰教法高等法院,法官将一名儿童移交给他的亲生父母,而该儿童已根据1952年任命登记契据(契据253)登记。然后,在雪兰莪高等法院的案件中,法官在收养登记无效的情况下将监护权交给了养父母。本文对该问题有两种表述。首先,彭亨伊斯兰教法高等法院法官在决定亲生父母和养父母之间的子女抚养权时,会考虑哪些因素?第二,雪兰莪高等法院的法官在决定亲生父母和养父母之间的子女监护权时,会考虑哪些因素?本研究采用司法规范方法和个案研究。数据收集还包括文献和文件。研究结果表明,首先,彭亨伊斯兰教法高等法院的法官在决定其亲生父母的子女抚养权时考虑的是,法官考虑了他们为夺回孩子所做的努力,他们对孩子有充分的权利。其次,雪兰莪高等法院法官在决定养父母的子女监护权时的考虑很重要,因为法官指出,最重要的是什么对孩子最好,孩子的亲生父母在照顾孩子方面也有一些障碍。监护权与孩子和监护人的利益密切相关,如果监护权存在不平衡,那么孩子的权益需要优先于监护人的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determination Of Child Care Rights Between Birthday Parents And Adopting Parents
Adoption of children is regulated in the Deed of Registration of Appointment 1952 (Deed 253) for Muslims and non-Muslims and the Deed of Adoption 1952 (Deed 257) for non-Muslims. Among the cases involving the struggle for custody is the one that occurred at the Pahang Sharia High Court, in which the judge handed over a child to his biological parents while the child had been registered under the Deed of Registration of Appointment 1952 (Deed 253). Then, in the case at the Selangor High Court, the judge handed over custody rights to the adoptive parents while the adoption registration was invalid. There are two formulations of the problem in this thesis. Firstly, what are the considerations of the Pahang Sharia High Court judges in determining child custody between biological parents and adoptive parents? Second, what are the considerations of the judges of the Selangor High Court in determining child custody between biological parents and adoptive parents? This research uses the juridical-normative method and case studies. Data collection is also done with literature and documentation. The results of the study show that first, the consideration of the judges of the Pahang Sharia High Court in determining child custody of their biological parents is because the judge looks at their efforts to get their child back and they have full rights to the child. Second, the consideration of the judge of the Selangor High Court in determining child custody of the adoptive parents is important because the judge stated that the main thing is what is best for the child, and the child's biological parents also have several obstacles to looking after the child. Custody is closely related to the interests of the child and the guardians, if there is an imbalance in custody, then the rights and interests of the child need to take precedence over the interests of the guardians.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信