隐私、伦理和制度研究

Alan Rubel
{"title":"隐私、伦理和制度研究","authors":"Alan Rubel","doi":"10.1002/ir.20308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is an evergreen conflict between data collection, analysis, and use and privacy. The contours of the conflict change as technologies develop and as our understanding of the meaning and value of information and privacy evolve. Much of the social concern about data analytics focuses on law enforcement and security (for example, the NSA bulk metadata collection program, watch lists, and risk analysis algorithms) and on large internet and social media corporations (Facebook, Google, Amazon, among others). Higher education analytics and institutional research pales in comparison to the scope of social media, and higher education institutions wield little power over individuals compared to the NSA or the FBI. Nonetheless, institutional research affects people’s privacy, and much of the information collected by higher education institutions is highly sensitive. The importance of education privacy (by which I mean privacy regarding information about persons’ educational records, information about persons’ interactions with educational institutions, and information collected or accessed by educational institutions) is reflected both in federal law (FERPA) and in professional codes of ethics, among them the AIR Statement of Ethical Principles (2019) (“AIR Statement” or “Statement”).","PeriodicalId":406201,"journal":{"name":"New Directions for Institutional Research","volume":"241 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privacy, Ethics, and Institutional Research\",\"authors\":\"Alan Rubel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ir.20308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is an evergreen conflict between data collection, analysis, and use and privacy. The contours of the conflict change as technologies develop and as our understanding of the meaning and value of information and privacy evolve. Much of the social concern about data analytics focuses on law enforcement and security (for example, the NSA bulk metadata collection program, watch lists, and risk analysis algorithms) and on large internet and social media corporations (Facebook, Google, Amazon, among others). Higher education analytics and institutional research pales in comparison to the scope of social media, and higher education institutions wield little power over individuals compared to the NSA or the FBI. Nonetheless, institutional research affects people’s privacy, and much of the information collected by higher education institutions is highly sensitive. The importance of education privacy (by which I mean privacy regarding information about persons’ educational records, information about persons’ interactions with educational institutions, and information collected or accessed by educational institutions) is reflected both in federal law (FERPA) and in professional codes of ethics, among them the AIR Statement of Ethical Principles (2019) (“AIR Statement” or “Statement”).\",\"PeriodicalId\":406201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Directions for Institutional Research\",\"volume\":\"241 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Directions for Institutional Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.20308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Directions for Institutional Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.20308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

数据收集、分析和使用与隐私之间的冲突一直存在。随着技术的发展,随着我们对信息和隐私的意义和价值的理解的发展,冲突的轮廓也在变化。社会对数据分析的关注主要集中在执法和安全方面(例如,美国国家安全局的大规模元数据收集计划、观察名单和风险分析算法),以及大型互联网和社交媒体公司(Facebook、谷歌、亚马逊等)。与社交媒体的范围相比,高等教育分析和机构研究显得苍白无力,而且与美国国家安全局或联邦调查局相比,高等教育机构对个人的影响力微乎其微。然而,机构研究影响了人们的隐私,高等教育机构收集的许多信息都是高度敏感的。教育隐私(我指的是有关个人教育记录信息、个人与教育机构互动信息以及教育机构收集或访问信息的隐私)的重要性反映在联邦法律(FERPA)和职业道德守则中,其中包括《AIR道德原则声明》(2019年)(“AIR声明”或“声明”)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Privacy, Ethics, and Institutional Research
There is an evergreen conflict between data collection, analysis, and use and privacy. The contours of the conflict change as technologies develop and as our understanding of the meaning and value of information and privacy evolve. Much of the social concern about data analytics focuses on law enforcement and security (for example, the NSA bulk metadata collection program, watch lists, and risk analysis algorithms) and on large internet and social media corporations (Facebook, Google, Amazon, among others). Higher education analytics and institutional research pales in comparison to the scope of social media, and higher education institutions wield little power over individuals compared to the NSA or the FBI. Nonetheless, institutional research affects people’s privacy, and much of the information collected by higher education institutions is highly sensitive. The importance of education privacy (by which I mean privacy regarding information about persons’ educational records, information about persons’ interactions with educational institutions, and information collected or accessed by educational institutions) is reflected both in federal law (FERPA) and in professional codes of ethics, among them the AIR Statement of Ethical Principles (2019) (“AIR Statement” or “Statement”).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信