多处理器实时系统中最早截止日期零松弛算法的可预测性

Xuefeng Piao, Sangchul Han, Heeheon Kim, Minkyu Park, Yookun Cho, Seong-je Cho
{"title":"多处理器实时系统中最早截止日期零松弛算法的可预测性","authors":"Xuefeng Piao, Sangchul Han, Heeheon Kim, Minkyu Park, Yookun Cho, Seong-je Cho","doi":"10.1109/ISORC.2006.64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Validation methods for hard real-time jobs are usually performed based on the maximum execution time. The actual execution time of jobs are assumed to be known only when the jobs arrive or not known until they finish. A predictable algorithm must guarantee that it can generate a schedule for any set of jobs such that the finish time for the actual execution time is no later than the finish time for the maximum execution time. It is known that any job-level fixed priority algorithm (such as earliest deadline first) is predictable. However, job-level dynamic priority algorithms (such as least laxity first) may or may not. In this paper, we investigate the predictability of a job-level dynamic priority algorithm EDZL (earliest deadline zero laxity). We show that EDZL is predictable on the domain of integers regardless of the knowledge of the actual execution times. Based on this result, furthermore, we also show that EDZL can successfully schedule any periodic task set if the total utilization is not greater than (m + 1)/2, where m is the number of processors","PeriodicalId":212174,"journal":{"name":"Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC'06)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictability of earliest deadline zero laxity algorithm for multiprocessor real-time systems\",\"authors\":\"Xuefeng Piao, Sangchul Han, Heeheon Kim, Minkyu Park, Yookun Cho, Seong-je Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISORC.2006.64\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Validation methods for hard real-time jobs are usually performed based on the maximum execution time. The actual execution time of jobs are assumed to be known only when the jobs arrive or not known until they finish. A predictable algorithm must guarantee that it can generate a schedule for any set of jobs such that the finish time for the actual execution time is no later than the finish time for the maximum execution time. It is known that any job-level fixed priority algorithm (such as earliest deadline first) is predictable. However, job-level dynamic priority algorithms (such as least laxity first) may or may not. In this paper, we investigate the predictability of a job-level dynamic priority algorithm EDZL (earliest deadline zero laxity). We show that EDZL is predictable on the domain of integers regardless of the knowledge of the actual execution times. Based on this result, furthermore, we also show that EDZL can successfully schedule any periodic task set if the total utilization is not greater than (m + 1)/2, where m is the number of processors\",\"PeriodicalId\":212174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC'06)\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC'06)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISORC.2006.64\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISORC.2006.64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

硬实时作业的验证方法通常基于最大执行时间执行。假设作业的实际执行时间只有在作业到达时才知道,或者直到作业完成时才知道。可预测算法必须保证它能够为任何一组作业生成调度,使得实际执行时间的完成时间不晚于最大执行时间的完成时间。众所周知,任何作业级固定优先级算法(如最早的截止日期优先)都是可预测的。然而,作业级动态优先级算法(例如最小松弛优先)可能是,也可能不是。本文研究了一种作业级动态优先级算法(EDZL)的可预测性。我们证明了EDZL在整数域上是可预测的,而不需要知道实际的执行时间。在此基础上,进一步证明了如果总利用率不大于(m + 1)/2 (m为处理器数),EDZL可以成功调度任何周期任务集
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictability of earliest deadline zero laxity algorithm for multiprocessor real-time systems
Validation methods for hard real-time jobs are usually performed based on the maximum execution time. The actual execution time of jobs are assumed to be known only when the jobs arrive or not known until they finish. A predictable algorithm must guarantee that it can generate a schedule for any set of jobs such that the finish time for the actual execution time is no later than the finish time for the maximum execution time. It is known that any job-level fixed priority algorithm (such as earliest deadline first) is predictable. However, job-level dynamic priority algorithms (such as least laxity first) may or may not. In this paper, we investigate the predictability of a job-level dynamic priority algorithm EDZL (earliest deadline zero laxity). We show that EDZL is predictable on the domain of integers regardless of the knowledge of the actual execution times. Based on this result, furthermore, we also show that EDZL can successfully schedule any periodic task set if the total utilization is not greater than (m + 1)/2, where m is the number of processors
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信