关于“风险社会”的现代德国哲学社会学

S. Shachin
{"title":"关于“风险社会”的现代德国哲学社会学","authors":"S. Shachin","doi":"10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2021.3.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the analysis of the ideas of a number of Austrian and German social philosophers on the problem of social risk, its correlation with danger taking into account the time component of decisions made under conditions of uncertainty. At the same time, it is important for the author to establish clear criteria for distinguishing between what depends on the actions of the person or community and what does not. On the one hand, we can talk about the risk, both justified and unjustified, and on the other hand, we mention the danger. It is the danger that is the opposite of stability, and the risk implies both, new chances and dangers that occur if actions have side effects that were not foreseen by the initiators of the actions. The differences in risk management on the part of those who make decisions and those whose interests are affected by these decisions are also analyzed. While the former may consider the situation as risky, the latter as dangerous due to the fact, that they do not have the ability to influence social processes. However, if decision-makers spread knowledge about the danger, delegate some of the resources and powers to overcome risks to society, then it will gradually learn flexible risk management, which implies a variety (and not rigidly fixed) ways of behavior. The society will also be able to take into account the mobile nature of the border separating risky behavior from dangerous: in what conditions and for whom the risk is justified, and for whom and when the danger occurs. Competent risk management leads to an increase in the reflexivity of society, which implies the creation of a favorable social environment for the spread of creativity. At the same time, each individual faces the task of constantly finding himself and self-development. It is reflexivity and creativity that allow society to get out of the state of stagnation, which is characterized by the primacy of the security mindset.","PeriodicalId":398098,"journal":{"name":"Logos et Praxis","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modern German Philosophical and Sociological Sciences About the “Risk Society”\",\"authors\":\"S. Shachin\",\"doi\":\"10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2021.3.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to the analysis of the ideas of a number of Austrian and German social philosophers on the problem of social risk, its correlation with danger taking into account the time component of decisions made under conditions of uncertainty. At the same time, it is important for the author to establish clear criteria for distinguishing between what depends on the actions of the person or community and what does not. On the one hand, we can talk about the risk, both justified and unjustified, and on the other hand, we mention the danger. It is the danger that is the opposite of stability, and the risk implies both, new chances and dangers that occur if actions have side effects that were not foreseen by the initiators of the actions. The differences in risk management on the part of those who make decisions and those whose interests are affected by these decisions are also analyzed. While the former may consider the situation as risky, the latter as dangerous due to the fact, that they do not have the ability to influence social processes. However, if decision-makers spread knowledge about the danger, delegate some of the resources and powers to overcome risks to society, then it will gradually learn flexible risk management, which implies a variety (and not rigidly fixed) ways of behavior. The society will also be able to take into account the mobile nature of the border separating risky behavior from dangerous: in what conditions and for whom the risk is justified, and for whom and when the danger occurs. Competent risk management leads to an increase in the reflexivity of society, which implies the creation of a favorable social environment for the spread of creativity. At the same time, each individual faces the task of constantly finding himself and self-development. It is reflexivity and creativity that allow society to get out of the state of stagnation, which is characterized by the primacy of the security mindset.\",\"PeriodicalId\":398098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Logos et Praxis\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Logos et Praxis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2021.3.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logos et Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2021.3.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文致力于分析一些奥地利和德国社会哲学家关于社会风险问题的观点,考虑到在不确定条件下做出决定的时间成分,社会风险与危险的相关性。同时,对于作者来说,重要的是建立明确的标准来区分什么取决于个人或社区的行为,什么不取决于个人或社区的行为。一方面,我们可以谈论风险,包括合理的和不合理的,另一方面,我们提到危险。与稳定相对立的是危险,这种危险既包括新的机会,也包括如果行动产生了始作俑者没有预见到的副作用而产生的危险。分析了决策主体和利益受影响主体在风险管理上的差异。前者可能认为这种情况是危险的,而后者是危险的,因为他们没有能力影响社会进程。然而,如果决策者传播关于危险的知识,将一些克服风险的资源和权力下放给社会,那么社会就会逐渐学会灵活的风险管理,这意味着多种(而不是僵化的)行为方式。社会还将能够考虑到区分危险行为和危险行为的边界的流动性质:在什么条件下,对谁来说,风险是合理的,对谁来说,何时发生危险。有能力的风险管理导致社会反身性的增加,这意味着创造一个有利于创造力传播的社会环境。同时,每个人都面临着不断发现自我和自我发展的任务。只有反身性和创造性才能使社会摆脱以安全思维为主的停滞状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modern German Philosophical and Sociological Sciences About the “Risk Society”
The article is devoted to the analysis of the ideas of a number of Austrian and German social philosophers on the problem of social risk, its correlation with danger taking into account the time component of decisions made under conditions of uncertainty. At the same time, it is important for the author to establish clear criteria for distinguishing between what depends on the actions of the person or community and what does not. On the one hand, we can talk about the risk, both justified and unjustified, and on the other hand, we mention the danger. It is the danger that is the opposite of stability, and the risk implies both, new chances and dangers that occur if actions have side effects that were not foreseen by the initiators of the actions. The differences in risk management on the part of those who make decisions and those whose interests are affected by these decisions are also analyzed. While the former may consider the situation as risky, the latter as dangerous due to the fact, that they do not have the ability to influence social processes. However, if decision-makers spread knowledge about the danger, delegate some of the resources and powers to overcome risks to society, then it will gradually learn flexible risk management, which implies a variety (and not rigidly fixed) ways of behavior. The society will also be able to take into account the mobile nature of the border separating risky behavior from dangerous: in what conditions and for whom the risk is justified, and for whom and when the danger occurs. Competent risk management leads to an increase in the reflexivity of society, which implies the creation of a favorable social environment for the spread of creativity. At the same time, each individual faces the task of constantly finding himself and self-development. It is reflexivity and creativity that allow society to get out of the state of stagnation, which is characterized by the primacy of the security mindset.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信