通过定性偏好关系增强推荐系统预测

Samia Boulkrinat, A. Hadjali, A. Mokhtari
{"title":"通过定性偏好关系增强推荐系统预测","authors":"Samia Boulkrinat, A. Hadjali, A. Mokhtari","doi":"10.1109/ISPS.2013.6581497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, we propose a novel approach to deal with user preference relations instead of absolute ratings, in recommender systems. User's preferences are ratings expressed qualitatively by using linguistic terms. This is a suitable technique when preferences are imprecise and vague. Due to the fact that the overall item rating may hide the users' preferences heterogeneity and mislead the system when predicting the items (products / services) that users are interested in, we also choose to incorporate multi-criteria ratings, which is a promising technique to improve the recommender systems accuracy. User's items ratings are represented through a preference graph which highlight better items relationships. Similarity between users is performed on the basis of the similarity of their preference relations instead of their absolute ratings, since preference relations can better reflect similar users' ratings patterns. Our approach enhances somehow the classical recommender system precision because the graphs used for prediction are more informative and reflect user's initial ratings relations.","PeriodicalId":222438,"journal":{"name":"2013 11th International Symposium on Programming and Systems (ISPS)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing recommender systems prediction through qualitative preference relations\",\"authors\":\"Samia Boulkrinat, A. Hadjali, A. Mokhtari\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISPS.2013.6581497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this work, we propose a novel approach to deal with user preference relations instead of absolute ratings, in recommender systems. User's preferences are ratings expressed qualitatively by using linguistic terms. This is a suitable technique when preferences are imprecise and vague. Due to the fact that the overall item rating may hide the users' preferences heterogeneity and mislead the system when predicting the items (products / services) that users are interested in, we also choose to incorporate multi-criteria ratings, which is a promising technique to improve the recommender systems accuracy. User's items ratings are represented through a preference graph which highlight better items relationships. Similarity between users is performed on the basis of the similarity of their preference relations instead of their absolute ratings, since preference relations can better reflect similar users' ratings patterns. Our approach enhances somehow the classical recommender system precision because the graphs used for prediction are more informative and reflect user's initial ratings relations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":222438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 11th International Symposium on Programming and Systems (ISPS)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 11th International Symposium on Programming and Systems (ISPS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPS.2013.6581497\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 11th International Symposium on Programming and Systems (ISPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPS.2013.6581497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在这项工作中,我们提出了一种在推荐系统中处理用户偏好关系而不是绝对评分的新方法。用户的偏好是通过使用语言术语定性表达的评级。当偏好不精确和模糊时,这是一种合适的技术。由于整体商品评级可能会隐藏用户偏好的异质性,并在预测用户感兴趣的商品(产品/服务)时误导系统,我们还选择合并多标准评级,这是一种有希望提高推荐系统准确性的技术。用户的物品评级通过一个偏好图来表示,该偏好图突出了更好的物品关系。用户之间的相似度是基于他们的偏好关系的相似度,而不是他们的绝对评分,因为偏好关系可以更好地反映相似用户的评分模式。我们的方法在某种程度上提高了经典推荐系统的精度,因为用于预测的图表信息更丰富,反映了用户的初始评级关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing recommender systems prediction through qualitative preference relations
In this work, we propose a novel approach to deal with user preference relations instead of absolute ratings, in recommender systems. User's preferences are ratings expressed qualitatively by using linguistic terms. This is a suitable technique when preferences are imprecise and vague. Due to the fact that the overall item rating may hide the users' preferences heterogeneity and mislead the system when predicting the items (products / services) that users are interested in, we also choose to incorporate multi-criteria ratings, which is a promising technique to improve the recommender systems accuracy. User's items ratings are represented through a preference graph which highlight better items relationships. Similarity between users is performed on the basis of the similarity of their preference relations instead of their absolute ratings, since preference relations can better reflect similar users' ratings patterns. Our approach enhances somehow the classical recommender system precision because the graphs used for prediction are more informative and reflect user's initial ratings relations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信