María Cristina Guevara Neri, Osslan O. Vergara Villegas, Vianey Guadalupe Cruz Sánchez, J. H. S. Azuela
{"title":"两种离线手写数字识别方法的比较","authors":"María Cristina Guevara Neri, Osslan O. Vergara Villegas, Vianey Guadalupe Cruz Sánchez, J. H. S. Azuela","doi":"10.13053/rcs-147-5-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the results of the comparison between two off-line handwritten digits recognition methods are presented. The first method is a network of perceptrons with which the images were classified after making a comparison by pairs of classes; the second, is a new method that performs a pixel by pixel comparison between the image to be classified, and the reference images. For the tests, a subset of 450 images from the MNIST database was used. Each method was evaluated in two parts: first, with a set of 100 training images, and second, with a set of 350 test images. With the first classifier, an accuracy of 93.86% was obtained, and with the second, an accuracy of 95.14%. After the analysis of the results, it is shown that the second method outperformed the first. The strength of the new method lies mainly in its robustness and execution time.","PeriodicalId":279869,"journal":{"name":"Research in Computing Science","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparación de dos métodos para reconocimiento de dígitos manuscritos fuera de línea\",\"authors\":\"María Cristina Guevara Neri, Osslan O. Vergara Villegas, Vianey Guadalupe Cruz Sánchez, J. H. S. Azuela\",\"doi\":\"10.13053/rcs-147-5-10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, the results of the comparison between two off-line handwritten digits recognition methods are presented. The first method is a network of perceptrons with which the images were classified after making a comparison by pairs of classes; the second, is a new method that performs a pixel by pixel comparison between the image to be classified, and the reference images. For the tests, a subset of 450 images from the MNIST database was used. Each method was evaluated in two parts: first, with a set of 100 training images, and second, with a set of 350 test images. With the first classifier, an accuracy of 93.86% was obtained, and with the second, an accuracy of 95.14%. After the analysis of the results, it is shown that the second method outperformed the first. The strength of the new method lies mainly in its robustness and execution time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":279869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Computing Science\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Computing Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13053/rcs-147-5-10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Computing Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13053/rcs-147-5-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparación de dos métodos para reconocimiento de dígitos manuscritos fuera de línea
In this paper, the results of the comparison between two off-line handwritten digits recognition methods are presented. The first method is a network of perceptrons with which the images were classified after making a comparison by pairs of classes; the second, is a new method that performs a pixel by pixel comparison between the image to be classified, and the reference images. For the tests, a subset of 450 images from the MNIST database was used. Each method was evaluated in two parts: first, with a set of 100 training images, and second, with a set of 350 test images. With the first classifier, an accuracy of 93.86% was obtained, and with the second, an accuracy of 95.14%. After the analysis of the results, it is shown that the second method outperformed the first. The strength of the new method lies mainly in its robustness and execution time.