基于主动学习的应用评论分析:在不影响分类准确性的情况下减少监督工作

Venkatesh T. Dhinakaran, Raseshwari Pulle, Nirav Ajmeri, Pradeep K. Murukannaiah
{"title":"基于主动学习的应用评论分析:在不影响分类准确性的情况下减少监督工作","authors":"Venkatesh T. Dhinakaran, Raseshwari Pulle, Nirav Ajmeri, Pradeep K. Murukannaiah","doi":"10.1109/RE.2018.00026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automated app review analysis is an important avenue for extracting a variety of requirements-related information. Typically, a first step toward performing such analysis is preparing a training dataset, where developers (experts) identify a set of reviews and, manually, annotate them according to a given task. Having sufficiently large training data is important for both achieving a high prediction accuracy and avoiding overfitting. Given millions of reviews, preparing a training set is laborious. We propose to incorporate active learning, a machine learning paradigm, in order to reduce the human effort involved in app review analysis. Our app review classification framework exploits three active learning strategies based on uncertainty sampling. We apply these strategies to an existing dataset of 4,400 app reviews for classifying app reviews as features, bugs, rating, and user experience. We find that active learning, compared to a training dataset chosen randomly, yields a significantly higher prediction accuracy under multiple scenarios.","PeriodicalId":445032,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"45","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"App Review Analysis Via Active Learning: Reducing Supervision Effort without Compromising Classification Accuracy\",\"authors\":\"Venkatesh T. Dhinakaran, Raseshwari Pulle, Nirav Ajmeri, Pradeep K. Murukannaiah\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RE.2018.00026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Automated app review analysis is an important avenue for extracting a variety of requirements-related information. Typically, a first step toward performing such analysis is preparing a training dataset, where developers (experts) identify a set of reviews and, manually, annotate them according to a given task. Having sufficiently large training data is important for both achieving a high prediction accuracy and avoiding overfitting. Given millions of reviews, preparing a training set is laborious. We propose to incorporate active learning, a machine learning paradigm, in order to reduce the human effort involved in app review analysis. Our app review classification framework exploits three active learning strategies based on uncertainty sampling. We apply these strategies to an existing dataset of 4,400 app reviews for classifying app reviews as features, bugs, rating, and user experience. We find that active learning, compared to a training dataset chosen randomly, yields a significantly higher prediction accuracy under multiple scenarios.\",\"PeriodicalId\":445032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"45\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2018.00026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 26th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2018.00026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

摘要

自动应用审查分析是提取各种需求相关信息的重要途径。通常,执行这种分析的第一步是准备一个训练数据集,其中开发人员(专家)识别一组评论,并根据给定的任务手动注释它们。拥有足够大的训练数据对于实现高预测精度和避免过拟合都很重要。考虑到数以百万计的评论,准备一个训练集是很费力的。我们建议将主动学习(一种机器学习范例)纳入其中,以减少应用审查分析中涉及的人力。我们的应用评论分类框架利用了三种基于不确定性采样的主动学习策略。我们将这些策略应用于现有的4400个应用评论数据集,将应用评论分类为功能、漏洞、评级和用户体验。我们发现,与随机选择的训练数据集相比,主动学习在多种场景下产生了更高的预测精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
App Review Analysis Via Active Learning: Reducing Supervision Effort without Compromising Classification Accuracy
Automated app review analysis is an important avenue for extracting a variety of requirements-related information. Typically, a first step toward performing such analysis is preparing a training dataset, where developers (experts) identify a set of reviews and, manually, annotate them according to a given task. Having sufficiently large training data is important for both achieving a high prediction accuracy and avoiding overfitting. Given millions of reviews, preparing a training set is laborious. We propose to incorporate active learning, a machine learning paradigm, in order to reduce the human effort involved in app review analysis. Our app review classification framework exploits three active learning strategies based on uncertainty sampling. We apply these strategies to an existing dataset of 4,400 app reviews for classifying app reviews as features, bugs, rating, and user experience. We find that active learning, compared to a training dataset chosen randomly, yields a significantly higher prediction accuracy under multiple scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信