创造新自由主义:两次世界大战之间的德国和被忽视的贬义绰号的起源

Phillip W. Magness
{"title":"创造新自由主义:两次世界大战之间的德国和被忽视的贬义绰号的起源","authors":"Phillip W. Magness","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3681101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Widespread academic use of the term \"neoliberalism\" is of surprisingly recent origin, dating to only the late 20th century. The vast and growing literature on this subject has nonetheless settled on an earlier origin story that depicts the term as self-selected moniker from the Walter Lippmann Colloquium, a 1938 Paris gathering of free-market academics that foreshadowed the post-war founding of the Mont Pelerin Society. \n \nThis origin story, however, is a myth that likely derives from a misreading of French philosopher Michel Foucault, who first directed modern scholarly attention to the Paris gathering. By turning to neglected German-language sources, this study shows that the term and modern concept of \"neoliberalism\" predate the 1938 conference. Rather, \"neo/neu-liberalismus\" was first popularized by a succession of Marxist and Fascist political theorists in the early 1920s, who employed it as a term of disparagement against the \"Marginal Utility School\" of economic thought anchored at the University of Vienna. These critics of marginalism diverged sharply on the political far-left and far-right of interwar Austrian and German politics, but shared a common disdain for the theory of subjective value promoted by the Viennese circle around economist Ludwig von Mises. \n \nThis earlier origin story of the term links it conceptually to modern-day uses, which often display a similar pejorative character to its interwar uses on the political left. It further helps to explain why several attendees of the 1938 conference, Mises among them, rejected the proposed term.","PeriodicalId":376979,"journal":{"name":"History Research Network (Forthcoming)","volume":"9 7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coining Neoliberalism: Interwar Germany and the Neglected Origins of a Pejorative Moniker\",\"authors\":\"Phillip W. Magness\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3681101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Widespread academic use of the term \\\"neoliberalism\\\" is of surprisingly recent origin, dating to only the late 20th century. The vast and growing literature on this subject has nonetheless settled on an earlier origin story that depicts the term as self-selected moniker from the Walter Lippmann Colloquium, a 1938 Paris gathering of free-market academics that foreshadowed the post-war founding of the Mont Pelerin Society. \\n \\nThis origin story, however, is a myth that likely derives from a misreading of French philosopher Michel Foucault, who first directed modern scholarly attention to the Paris gathering. By turning to neglected German-language sources, this study shows that the term and modern concept of \\\"neoliberalism\\\" predate the 1938 conference. Rather, \\\"neo/neu-liberalismus\\\" was first popularized by a succession of Marxist and Fascist political theorists in the early 1920s, who employed it as a term of disparagement against the \\\"Marginal Utility School\\\" of economic thought anchored at the University of Vienna. These critics of marginalism diverged sharply on the political far-left and far-right of interwar Austrian and German politics, but shared a common disdain for the theory of subjective value promoted by the Viennese circle around economist Ludwig von Mises. \\n \\nThis earlier origin story of the term links it conceptually to modern-day uses, which often display a similar pejorative character to its interwar uses on the political left. It further helps to explain why several attendees of the 1938 conference, Mises among them, rejected the proposed term.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History Research Network (Forthcoming)\",\"volume\":\"9 7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History Research Network (Forthcoming)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3681101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History Research Network (Forthcoming)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3681101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

令人惊讶的是,“新自由主义”一词在学术上的广泛使用是最近才出现的,可以追溯到20世纪末。尽管如此,关于这一主题的大量且不断增长的文献已经确定了一个更早的起源故事,该故事将该术语描述为沃尔特·李普曼讨论会(Walter Lippmann Colloquium)自选的绰号,该讨论会是1938年在巴黎举行的一次自由市场学者聚会,预示着战后圣殿山学会(Mont Pelerin Society)的成立。然而,这个起源的故事是一个神话,可能源于对法国哲学家米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault)的误读,福柯是第一个将现代学者的注意力引向巴黎会议的人。通过查阅被忽视的德语资料,本研究表明,“新自由主义”这一术语和现代概念早于1938年会议。相反,“新/新自由主义”最初是由20世纪20年代早期的一批马克思主义和法西斯主义政治理论家推广的,他们用这个词来贬低维也纳大学的“边际效用学派”的经济思想。这些对边际主义的批评在两次世界大战之间的奥地利和德国政治的极左和极右上产生了尖锐的分歧,但对维也纳学派经济学家路德维希·冯·米塞斯所倡导的主观价值理论有着共同的蔑视。这个词的早期起源故事在概念上将其与现代用法联系起来,现代用法经常显示出与两次世界大战之间政治左派使用类似的贬义特征。这进一步有助于解释为什么1938年会议的几位与会者,包括米塞斯,拒绝了这个提议的术语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coining Neoliberalism: Interwar Germany and the Neglected Origins of a Pejorative Moniker
Widespread academic use of the term "neoliberalism" is of surprisingly recent origin, dating to only the late 20th century. The vast and growing literature on this subject has nonetheless settled on an earlier origin story that depicts the term as self-selected moniker from the Walter Lippmann Colloquium, a 1938 Paris gathering of free-market academics that foreshadowed the post-war founding of the Mont Pelerin Society. This origin story, however, is a myth that likely derives from a misreading of French philosopher Michel Foucault, who first directed modern scholarly attention to the Paris gathering. By turning to neglected German-language sources, this study shows that the term and modern concept of "neoliberalism" predate the 1938 conference. Rather, "neo/neu-liberalismus" was first popularized by a succession of Marxist and Fascist political theorists in the early 1920s, who employed it as a term of disparagement against the "Marginal Utility School" of economic thought anchored at the University of Vienna. These critics of marginalism diverged sharply on the political far-left and far-right of interwar Austrian and German politics, but shared a common disdain for the theory of subjective value promoted by the Viennese circle around economist Ludwig von Mises. This earlier origin story of the term links it conceptually to modern-day uses, which often display a similar pejorative character to its interwar uses on the political left. It further helps to explain why several attendees of the 1938 conference, Mises among them, rejected the proposed term.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信