{"title":"狭义相对论中的速度和时间","authors":"Peter J. Riggs","doi":"10.1142/s2661339522500172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Four-vectors are defined analogously to three-vectors and provide a compact means of presenting mathematical results in relativity theory. However, the four-velocity vector does not have the same physical significance as the three-velocity vector, but assuming so has led to the declaration that there is motion through spacetime which explains special relativistic time dilation. It is shown that four-velocity cannot legitimately be employed in this manner and that the time dilation effect does not require any motion through spacetime nor any speed through time.","PeriodicalId":112108,"journal":{"name":"The Physics Educator","volume":"827 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Four-Velocity and Time in Special Relativity\",\"authors\":\"Peter J. Riggs\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s2661339522500172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Four-vectors are defined analogously to three-vectors and provide a compact means of presenting mathematical results in relativity theory. However, the four-velocity vector does not have the same physical significance as the three-velocity vector, but assuming so has led to the declaration that there is motion through spacetime which explains special relativistic time dilation. It is shown that four-velocity cannot legitimately be employed in this manner and that the time dilation effect does not require any motion through spacetime nor any speed through time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Physics Educator\",\"volume\":\"827 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Physics Educator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2661339522500172\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Physics Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2661339522500172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Four-vectors are defined analogously to three-vectors and provide a compact means of presenting mathematical results in relativity theory. However, the four-velocity vector does not have the same physical significance as the three-velocity vector, but assuming so has led to the declaration that there is motion through spacetime which explains special relativistic time dilation. It is shown that four-velocity cannot legitimately be employed in this manner and that the time dilation effect does not require any motion through spacetime nor any speed through time.