酸性矿山排水修复的光学原位监测:实验室与模型研究

IF 1.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 WATER RESOURCES
Maximilian Reuß, Sascha E. Oswald, Matthias Munz, Michael U. Kumke
{"title":"酸性矿山排水修复的光学原位监测:实验室与模型研究","authors":"Maximilian Reuß,&nbsp;Sascha E. Oswald,&nbsp;Matthias Munz,&nbsp;Michael U. Kumke","doi":"10.1111/gwmr.12590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A permeable reactive barrier (PRB) can be deployed to remediate acid mine drainage. The performance of a PRB material under different boundary conditions (pH, flow velocity, and sulfate concentration) was investigated in a series of column experiments applying in-situ optical sensing methods for pH and oxygen detection. The reactive material consisted of organic components (compost, wood, and coconut shell) mixed with calcium carbonate and fine gravel. The input concentrations were around 1000 mg/L for iron and 3000 mg/L for sulfate, and the pH value was 6.2. The remediation efficiency of iron was 14.6% and of sulfate 15.2%, but was expected to scale up when moving to a field-site PRB with greater thickness. The iron and sulfate removal was influenced by decreasing the flow velocity and increasing the sulfate input concentration and the pH value. In an experiment with low pH boundary conditions (pH = 2.2), acidity was neutralized in the PRB by calcium carbonate during an experiment duration of 47 days. The modeling program MIN3P was used to create a simulation of the laboratory experiments. This helps to design parameters, for example, the residence time in the PRB, which is necessary for close to 100% remediation efficiency. This study shows the application of optical oxygen and pH monitoring in PRBs. In this context, they can be used to monitor the stability of a PRB for the remediation of acid mine drainage (AMD).</p>","PeriodicalId":55081,"journal":{"name":"Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation","volume":"43 4","pages":"67-81"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ngwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwmr.12590","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optical In Situ Monitoring of Acid Mine Drainage Remediation: Laboratory and Model Investigation\",\"authors\":\"Maximilian Reuß,&nbsp;Sascha E. Oswald,&nbsp;Matthias Munz,&nbsp;Michael U. Kumke\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gwmr.12590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A permeable reactive barrier (PRB) can be deployed to remediate acid mine drainage. The performance of a PRB material under different boundary conditions (pH, flow velocity, and sulfate concentration) was investigated in a series of column experiments applying in-situ optical sensing methods for pH and oxygen detection. The reactive material consisted of organic components (compost, wood, and coconut shell) mixed with calcium carbonate and fine gravel. The input concentrations were around 1000 mg/L for iron and 3000 mg/L for sulfate, and the pH value was 6.2. The remediation efficiency of iron was 14.6% and of sulfate 15.2%, but was expected to scale up when moving to a field-site PRB with greater thickness. The iron and sulfate removal was influenced by decreasing the flow velocity and increasing the sulfate input concentration and the pH value. In an experiment with low pH boundary conditions (pH = 2.2), acidity was neutralized in the PRB by calcium carbonate during an experiment duration of 47 days. The modeling program MIN3P was used to create a simulation of the laboratory experiments. This helps to design parameters, for example, the residence time in the PRB, which is necessary for close to 100% remediation efficiency. This study shows the application of optical oxygen and pH monitoring in PRBs. In this context, they can be used to monitor the stability of a PRB for the remediation of acid mine drainage (AMD).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation\",\"volume\":\"43 4\",\"pages\":\"67-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ngwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwmr.12590\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwmr.12590\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwmr.12590","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可渗透反应屏障(PRB)可用于酸性矿井水的修复。采用原位光学传感pH和氧检测方法,研究了不同边界条件(pH、流速和硫酸盐浓度)下PRB材料的性能。反应材料由有机成分(堆肥、木材和椰子壳)与碳酸钙和细砾石混合而成。铁和硫酸盐的输入浓度分别为1000 mg/L和3000 mg/L左右,pH值为6.2。铁的修复效率为14.6%,硫酸盐的修复效率为15.2%,但当迁移到更厚的现场PRB时,预计会扩大规模。降低流速、增加硫酸盐输入浓度和pH值对铁和硫酸盐的去除率有影响。在低pH边界条件(pH = 2.2)的实验中,碳酸钙在47天的实验期间中和了PRB中的酸性。利用MIN3P建模软件对实验室实验进行了模拟。这有助于设计参数,例如,在PRB中的停留时间,这是接近100%修复效率所必需的。本研究展示了光学氧和pH监测在PRBs中的应用。在这种情况下,它们可用于监测PRB的稳定性,以修复酸性矿井排水(AMD)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Optical In Situ Monitoring of Acid Mine Drainage Remediation: Laboratory and Model Investigation

Optical In Situ Monitoring of Acid Mine Drainage Remediation: Laboratory and Model Investigation

A permeable reactive barrier (PRB) can be deployed to remediate acid mine drainage. The performance of a PRB material under different boundary conditions (pH, flow velocity, and sulfate concentration) was investigated in a series of column experiments applying in-situ optical sensing methods for pH and oxygen detection. The reactive material consisted of organic components (compost, wood, and coconut shell) mixed with calcium carbonate and fine gravel. The input concentrations were around 1000 mg/L for iron and 3000 mg/L for sulfate, and the pH value was 6.2. The remediation efficiency of iron was 14.6% and of sulfate 15.2%, but was expected to scale up when moving to a field-site PRB with greater thickness. The iron and sulfate removal was influenced by decreasing the flow velocity and increasing the sulfate input concentration and the pH value. In an experiment with low pH boundary conditions (pH = 2.2), acidity was neutralized in the PRB by calcium carbonate during an experiment duration of 47 days. The modeling program MIN3P was used to create a simulation of the laboratory experiments. This helps to design parameters, for example, the residence time in the PRB, which is necessary for close to 100% remediation efficiency. This study shows the application of optical oxygen and pH monitoring in PRBs. In this context, they can be used to monitor the stability of a PRB for the remediation of acid mine drainage (AMD).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1981, Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation® has been a resource for researchers and practitioners in the field. It is a quarterly journal that offers the best in application oriented, peer-reviewed papers together with insightful articles from the practitioner''s perspective. Each issue features papers containing cutting-edge information on treatment technology, columns by industry experts, news briefs, and equipment news. GWMR plays a unique role in advancing the practice of the groundwater monitoring and remediation field by providing forward-thinking research with practical solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信