从解散的组织间协作中得到的教训

Tiffany A. Dykstra-DeVette
{"title":"从解散的组织间协作中得到的教训","authors":"Tiffany A. Dykstra-DeVette","doi":"10.1080/17459435.2021.2010122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dissolution of nonprofit interorganizational collaborations is an understudied, but relatively common phenomenon. This study uses interviews, field notes, and organizational documents to describe the tensions that emerged during the dissolution of an interorganizational collaboration among service providers, faith-based organizations, and community leaders and stakeholders aimed at addressing homelessness in rural Appalachia. Drawing on tension-centered theories of interorganizational collaboration, the analysis presents three tensions between community and fragmentation, organizational and collective accomplishments, and economic vs. social interests. The analysis demonstrates how the negotiation of tensions sustained collaboration, and how tensions were resolved through organizational dissolution. The conclusions present three lessons for dissolving community organizations that could facilitate future collaboration and research, emphasizing the importance of credit-sharing as a means of sustaining productive tensions in interorganizational collaborations.","PeriodicalId":406864,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research Reports in Communication","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons from a dissolving interorganizational collaboration\",\"authors\":\"Tiffany A. Dykstra-DeVette\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17459435.2021.2010122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The dissolution of nonprofit interorganizational collaborations is an understudied, but relatively common phenomenon. This study uses interviews, field notes, and organizational documents to describe the tensions that emerged during the dissolution of an interorganizational collaboration among service providers, faith-based organizations, and community leaders and stakeholders aimed at addressing homelessness in rural Appalachia. Drawing on tension-centered theories of interorganizational collaboration, the analysis presents three tensions between community and fragmentation, organizational and collective accomplishments, and economic vs. social interests. The analysis demonstrates how the negotiation of tensions sustained collaboration, and how tensions were resolved through organizational dissolution. The conclusions present three lessons for dissolving community organizations that could facilitate future collaboration and research, emphasizing the importance of credit-sharing as a means of sustaining productive tensions in interorganizational collaborations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":406864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qualitative Research Reports in Communication\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qualitative Research Reports in Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17459435.2021.2010122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research Reports in Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17459435.2021.2010122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非营利组织间合作的解体是一个尚未得到充分研究,但相对普遍的现象。本研究使用访谈、实地记录和组织文件来描述服务提供者、基于信仰的组织、社区领袖和利益相关者之间的组织间合作在解决阿巴拉契亚农村无家可归问题的过程中出现的紧张局势。利用以紧张为中心的组织间合作理论,该分析提出了社区与分裂、组织与集体成就、经济与社会利益之间的三种紧张关系。分析展示了紧张关系的协商如何维持合作,以及紧张关系如何通过组织解散来解决。结论为解散社区组织提供了三个可以促进未来合作和研究的经验教训,强调了作为维持组织间合作中富有成效的紧张关系的手段的信用分享的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lessons from a dissolving interorganizational collaboration
The dissolution of nonprofit interorganizational collaborations is an understudied, but relatively common phenomenon. This study uses interviews, field notes, and organizational documents to describe the tensions that emerged during the dissolution of an interorganizational collaboration among service providers, faith-based organizations, and community leaders and stakeholders aimed at addressing homelessness in rural Appalachia. Drawing on tension-centered theories of interorganizational collaboration, the analysis presents three tensions between community and fragmentation, organizational and collective accomplishments, and economic vs. social interests. The analysis demonstrates how the negotiation of tensions sustained collaboration, and how tensions were resolved through organizational dissolution. The conclusions present three lessons for dissolving community organizations that could facilitate future collaboration and research, emphasizing the importance of credit-sharing as a means of sustaining productive tensions in interorganizational collaborations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信