分屏视图是否有助于学术文档的导航?

Juliane Franze, K. Marriott, Michael Wybrow
{"title":"分屏视图是否有助于学术文档的导航?","authors":"Juliane Franze, K. Marriott, Michael Wybrow","doi":"10.1145/2682571.2797093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paper is still the dominant medium in academic reading. One reason is the ease of navigation within a paper document. We therefore investigate how to provide a more paper-like navigation within an academic document when read digitally. We present the results of a user study in which we compare the standard single-view hyperlink navigation with a split-view navigation. The split-view offers the reader a primary reading view of the document as well as a contextual view next to it. When a hyperlink is activated in the reading view the contextual view shows the referenced element. While we found no difference between user performance, the split-view was preferred by almost all users to the standard single-view navigation model.","PeriodicalId":106339,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does a Split-View Aid Navigation Within Academic Documents?\",\"authors\":\"Juliane Franze, K. Marriott, Michael Wybrow\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2682571.2797093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Paper is still the dominant medium in academic reading. One reason is the ease of navigation within a paper document. We therefore investigate how to provide a more paper-like navigation within an academic document when read digitally. We present the results of a user study in which we compare the standard single-view hyperlink navigation with a split-view navigation. The split-view offers the reader a primary reading view of the document as well as a contextual view next to it. When a hyperlink is activated in the reading view the contextual view shows the referenced element. While we found no difference between user performance, the split-view was preferred by almost all users to the standard single-view navigation model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2682571.2797093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2682571.2797093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

论文仍然是学术阅读的主要媒介。一个原因是在纸质文档中易于导航。因此,我们研究如何在数字化阅读的学术文档中提供更像纸张的导航。我们展示了一项用户研究的结果,其中我们比较了标准的单视图超链接导航和分视图导航。分拆视图为读者提供了文档的主要阅读视图以及旁边的上下文视图。当在阅读视图中激活超链接时,上下文视图显示引用的元素。虽然我们发现用户性能之间没有差异,但几乎所有用户都更喜欢分屏视图,而不是标准的单视图导航模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does a Split-View Aid Navigation Within Academic Documents?
Paper is still the dominant medium in academic reading. One reason is the ease of navigation within a paper document. We therefore investigate how to provide a more paper-like navigation within an academic document when read digitally. We present the results of a user study in which we compare the standard single-view hyperlink navigation with a split-view navigation. The split-view offers the reader a primary reading view of the document as well as a contextual view next to it. When a hyperlink is activated in the reading view the contextual view shows the referenced element. While we found no difference between user performance, the split-view was preferred by almost all users to the standard single-view navigation model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信