Ji‐Hoon Lee, Y. Jung, H. Cha, H. Rhee, Hye-Yoen Choi, W. Shin
{"title":"韩国快速眼动睡眠行为障碍患者无张力快速眼动睡眠的量化:人工与计算机辅助评分方法的比较","authors":"Ji‐Hoon Lee, Y. Jung, H. Cha, H. Rhee, Hye-Yoen Choi, W. Shin","doi":"10.13078/JKSRS.14009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Address for correspondence Won Chul Shin, MD, PhD Department of Neurology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 892 Dongnam-ro, Gangdong-gu, Seoul 134-727, Korea Tel: +82-2-440-6166 Fax: +82-2-440-7262 E-mail: shinwc@khu.ac.kr Objectives: The polysomnographic hallmark of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is loss of muscle atonia during REM sleep; REM sleep without atonia (RSWA). However, the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD) criteria did not suggest optimized diagnostic value of RSWA and how to score muscle activity during REM sleep. Many previous studies have been tried to figure out the objective quantitative cut-off values of RSWA. We investigated RSWA in Korean RBD patients compared with normal control, to quantify the cut-off value in diagnosis of RBD, using both manual and computer-assisted scoring methods (REM atonia index, RAI). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed polysomnography and clinical data of 40 patients, 10 age-matched controls by ICSD-3 criteria. The quantitative analysis of chin electromyography density during REM sleep was done by both manual and computerized method. The RSWA and RAI were compared within two groups. Results: In computerized method, the mean RAI of RBD patient was 0.66±0.20, and 0.93±0.38 in control group (p<0.001). Also, in manual method, RSWA were also significantly increased within RBD patient compared with normal controls (tonic activity: 9.1±10.3 vs. 0.1±0.2, phasic activity: 7.5±6.4 vs. 1.6±1.2, p<0.002). Conclusions: We quantify the characteristics of RSWA in Korean RBD patients and suggest that we may diagnose RBD who present RSWA with 4.1% or more increase in total REM sleep duration and RAI more than 0.84. J Korean Sleep Res Soc 2014;11(2):50-56","PeriodicalId":243131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Sleep Research Society","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantification of REM Sleep without Atonia in Korean REM Sleep Behavior Disorder Patients: Comparison of Manual and Computer-Assisted Scoring Methods\",\"authors\":\"Ji‐Hoon Lee, Y. Jung, H. Cha, H. Rhee, Hye-Yoen Choi, W. Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.13078/JKSRS.14009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Address for correspondence Won Chul Shin, MD, PhD Department of Neurology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 892 Dongnam-ro, Gangdong-gu, Seoul 134-727, Korea Tel: +82-2-440-6166 Fax: +82-2-440-7262 E-mail: shinwc@khu.ac.kr Objectives: The polysomnographic hallmark of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is loss of muscle atonia during REM sleep; REM sleep without atonia (RSWA). However, the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD) criteria did not suggest optimized diagnostic value of RSWA and how to score muscle activity during REM sleep. Many previous studies have been tried to figure out the objective quantitative cut-off values of RSWA. We investigated RSWA in Korean RBD patients compared with normal control, to quantify the cut-off value in diagnosis of RBD, using both manual and computer-assisted scoring methods (REM atonia index, RAI). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed polysomnography and clinical data of 40 patients, 10 age-matched controls by ICSD-3 criteria. The quantitative analysis of chin electromyography density during REM sleep was done by both manual and computerized method. The RSWA and RAI were compared within two groups. Results: In computerized method, the mean RAI of RBD patient was 0.66±0.20, and 0.93±0.38 in control group (p<0.001). Also, in manual method, RSWA were also significantly increased within RBD patient compared with normal controls (tonic activity: 9.1±10.3 vs. 0.1±0.2, phasic activity: 7.5±6.4 vs. 1.6±1.2, p<0.002). Conclusions: We quantify the characteristics of RSWA in Korean RBD patients and suggest that we may diagnose RBD who present RSWA with 4.1% or more increase in total REM sleep duration and RAI more than 0.84. J Korean Sleep Res Soc 2014;11(2):50-56\",\"PeriodicalId\":243131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korean Sleep Research Society\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korean Sleep Research Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13078/JKSRS.14009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Sleep Research Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13078/JKSRS.14009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
通信地址:Won Chul Shin,医学博士,博士,庆熙大学医学院江东医院神经内科,电话:+82-2-44 -6166,江东区东南路892号,韩国,电话:+82-2-44 -7262,E-mail: shinwc@khu.ac.kr目的:快速眼动(REM)睡眠行为障碍(RBD)的多道睡眠图标志是快速眼动(REM)睡眠过程中肌肉紧张的丧失;无张力快速眼动睡眠(RSWA)。然而,国际睡眠障碍分类(ICSD)标准并没有建议RSWA的优化诊断价值以及如何在REM睡眠期间对肌肉活动进行评分。以往的许多研究都试图找出RSWA的客观定量临界值。我们将韩国RBD患者的RSWA与正常对照进行比较,使用人工和计算机辅助评分方法(REM张力指数,RAI)来量化RBD诊断的临界值。方法:回顾性分析40例患者的多导睡眠图和临床资料,对照10例,符合ICSD-3标准。采用人工和计算机相结合的方法定量分析快速眼动睡眠时的颏肌电密度。比较两组的RSWA和RAI。结果:计算机化方法RBD患者平均RAI为0.66±0.20,对照组平均RAI为0.93±0.38 (p<0.001)。此外,在手动方法中,RBD患者的RSWA也明显高于正常对照组(强直活动:9.1±10.3 vs. 0.1±0.2,相活动:7.5±6.4 vs. 1.6±1.2,p<0.002)。结论:我们量化了韩国RBD患者的RSWA特征,并建议如果RSWA表现为快速眼动睡眠总时间增加4.1%或更多,RAI大于0.84,我们可以诊断RBD。[J] .睡眠与睡眠杂志,2014;11(2):50-56
Quantification of REM Sleep without Atonia in Korean REM Sleep Behavior Disorder Patients: Comparison of Manual and Computer-Assisted Scoring Methods
Address for correspondence Won Chul Shin, MD, PhD Department of Neurology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 892 Dongnam-ro, Gangdong-gu, Seoul 134-727, Korea Tel: +82-2-440-6166 Fax: +82-2-440-7262 E-mail: shinwc@khu.ac.kr Objectives: The polysomnographic hallmark of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is loss of muscle atonia during REM sleep; REM sleep without atonia (RSWA). However, the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD) criteria did not suggest optimized diagnostic value of RSWA and how to score muscle activity during REM sleep. Many previous studies have been tried to figure out the objective quantitative cut-off values of RSWA. We investigated RSWA in Korean RBD patients compared with normal control, to quantify the cut-off value in diagnosis of RBD, using both manual and computer-assisted scoring methods (REM atonia index, RAI). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed polysomnography and clinical data of 40 patients, 10 age-matched controls by ICSD-3 criteria. The quantitative analysis of chin electromyography density during REM sleep was done by both manual and computerized method. The RSWA and RAI were compared within two groups. Results: In computerized method, the mean RAI of RBD patient was 0.66±0.20, and 0.93±0.38 in control group (p<0.001). Also, in manual method, RSWA were also significantly increased within RBD patient compared with normal controls (tonic activity: 9.1±10.3 vs. 0.1±0.2, phasic activity: 7.5±6.4 vs. 1.6±1.2, p<0.002). Conclusions: We quantify the characteristics of RSWA in Korean RBD patients and suggest that we may diagnose RBD who present RSWA with 4.1% or more increase in total REM sleep duration and RAI more than 0.84. J Korean Sleep Res Soc 2014;11(2):50-56