应用层物联网协议的定性比较模型

S. Kakakhel, Tomi Westerlund, M. Daneshtalab, Zhuo Zou, J. Plosila, H. Tenhunen
{"title":"应用层物联网协议的定性比较模型","authors":"S. Kakakhel, Tomi Westerlund, M. Daneshtalab, Zhuo Zou, J. Plosila, H. Tenhunen","doi":"10.1109/FMEC.2019.8795324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Protocols enable things to connect and communicate, thus making the Internet of Things possible. The performance aspect of the Internet of Things protocols, vital to its widespread utilization, have received much attention. However, one aspect of IoT protocols, essential to its adoption in the real world, is a protocols’ feature set. Comparative analysis based on competing features and properties are rarely if ever, discussed in the literature. In this paper, we define 19 attributes in 5 categories that are essential for IoT stakeholders to consider. These attributes are then used to contrast four IoT protocols, MQTT, HTTP, CoAP and XMPP. Furthermore, we discuss scenarios where an assessment based on comparative strengths and weaknesses would be beneficial. The provided comparison model can be easily extended to include protocols like MQTT-SN, AMQP and DDS.","PeriodicalId":101825,"journal":{"name":"2019 Fourth International Conference on Fog and Mobile Edge Computing (FMEC)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Qualitative Comparison Model for Application Layer IoT Protocols\",\"authors\":\"S. Kakakhel, Tomi Westerlund, M. Daneshtalab, Zhuo Zou, J. Plosila, H. Tenhunen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FMEC.2019.8795324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Protocols enable things to connect and communicate, thus making the Internet of Things possible. The performance aspect of the Internet of Things protocols, vital to its widespread utilization, have received much attention. However, one aspect of IoT protocols, essential to its adoption in the real world, is a protocols’ feature set. Comparative analysis based on competing features and properties are rarely if ever, discussed in the literature. In this paper, we define 19 attributes in 5 categories that are essential for IoT stakeholders to consider. These attributes are then used to contrast four IoT protocols, MQTT, HTTP, CoAP and XMPP. Furthermore, we discuss scenarios where an assessment based on comparative strengths and weaknesses would be beneficial. The provided comparison model can be easily extended to include protocols like MQTT-SN, AMQP and DDS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 Fourth International Conference on Fog and Mobile Edge Computing (FMEC)\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 Fourth International Conference on Fog and Mobile Edge Computing (FMEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FMEC.2019.8795324\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Fourth International Conference on Fog and Mobile Edge Computing (FMEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FMEC.2019.8795324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

协议使事物能够连接和通信,从而使物联网成为可能。物联网协议的性能方面对其广泛应用至关重要,受到了广泛的关注。然而,物联网协议的一个方面,对其在现实世界中的采用至关重要,是协议的功能集。基于竞争特征和属性的比较分析很少在文献中讨论。在本文中,我们定义了物联网利益相关者必须考虑的5类19个属性。然后使用这些属性来对比四种物联网协议,MQTT, HTTP, CoAP和XMPP。此外,我们还讨论了基于比较优势和劣势的评估将是有益的情况。所提供的比较模型可以很容易地扩展到包括MQTT-SN、AMQP和DDS等协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Qualitative Comparison Model for Application Layer IoT Protocols
Protocols enable things to connect and communicate, thus making the Internet of Things possible. The performance aspect of the Internet of Things protocols, vital to its widespread utilization, have received much attention. However, one aspect of IoT protocols, essential to its adoption in the real world, is a protocols’ feature set. Comparative analysis based on competing features and properties are rarely if ever, discussed in the literature. In this paper, we define 19 attributes in 5 categories that are essential for IoT stakeholders to consider. These attributes are then used to contrast four IoT protocols, MQTT, HTTP, CoAP and XMPP. Furthermore, we discuss scenarios where an assessment based on comparative strengths and weaknesses would be beneficial. The provided comparison model can be easily extended to include protocols like MQTT-SN, AMQP and DDS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信