分歧能解释金融异常吗?

Deok-Hyeon Lee, T. Kim
{"title":"分歧能解释金融异常吗?","authors":"Deok-Hyeon Lee, T. Kim","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2812408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We find that disagreement helps explain well-known ten cross-sectional financial anomalies. Specifically, we first show that the underperformance of short legs of the anomalies is most pronounced among high disagreement stocks. This results in stronger financial anomalies among high disagreement stocks, and stronger disagreement effect among stocks in the short legs. Also, the disagreement-mimicking portfolio (return spread between low and high disagreement stocks) subsumes the profits from the long-short anomaly strategies. Finally, disagreement-induced overpricing significantly contributes to the effect of investor sentiment on financial anomalies (Stambaugh, Yu, and Yuan, 2012). Overall evidence highlights the contribution of disagreement to financial anomalies.","PeriodicalId":365642,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Behavioral Finance (Microeconomics) (Topic)","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Disagreement Explain Financial Anomalies?\",\"authors\":\"Deok-Hyeon Lee, T. Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2812408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We find that disagreement helps explain well-known ten cross-sectional financial anomalies. Specifically, we first show that the underperformance of short legs of the anomalies is most pronounced among high disagreement stocks. This results in stronger financial anomalies among high disagreement stocks, and stronger disagreement effect among stocks in the short legs. Also, the disagreement-mimicking portfolio (return spread between low and high disagreement stocks) subsumes the profits from the long-short anomaly strategies. Finally, disagreement-induced overpricing significantly contributes to the effect of investor sentiment on financial anomalies (Stambaugh, Yu, and Yuan, 2012). Overall evidence highlights the contribution of disagreement to financial anomalies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Behavioral Finance (Microeconomics) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Behavioral Finance (Microeconomics) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2812408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Behavioral Finance (Microeconomics) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2812408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们发现,这种分歧有助于解释众所周知的十种横断面金融异常现象。具体地说,我们首先表明,在高分歧股票中,异常的短腿表现不佳最为明显。这导致高分歧股票的财务异常更强,短腿股票的分歧效应更强。此外,分歧模仿投资组合(低和高分歧股票之间的回报差)包含了多空异常策略的利润。最后,分歧导致的过高定价显著促进了投资者情绪对金融异常的影响(Stambaugh, Yu, and Yuan, 2012)。总体证据突出了分歧对金融异常的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Disagreement Explain Financial Anomalies?
We find that disagreement helps explain well-known ten cross-sectional financial anomalies. Specifically, we first show that the underperformance of short legs of the anomalies is most pronounced among high disagreement stocks. This results in stronger financial anomalies among high disagreement stocks, and stronger disagreement effect among stocks in the short legs. Also, the disagreement-mimicking portfolio (return spread between low and high disagreement stocks) subsumes the profits from the long-short anomaly strategies. Finally, disagreement-induced overpricing significantly contributes to the effect of investor sentiment on financial anomalies (Stambaugh, Yu, and Yuan, 2012). Overall evidence highlights the contribution of disagreement to financial anomalies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信