移民家庭的孩子——美国和50个州:官方贫困衡量标准之外的经济需求。研究简报系列。发布# 2009 - 19所示。

D. J. Hernandez, N. Denton, S. Macartney
{"title":"移民家庭的孩子——美国和50个州:官方贫困衡量标准之外的经济需求。研究简报系列。发布# 2009 - 19所示。","authors":"D. J. Hernandez, N. Denton, S. Macartney","doi":"10.1037/e538212009-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Few would deny that reducing child poverty is a worthy goal for this nation, or any nation. Far less agreement exists about the best way to measure poverty. Increasingly, though, informed voices have raised questions about the adequacy of the official U.S. poverty measure. This Research Brief , the second in our series on immigrant children, draws on new results from Census 2000 data to examine differences in the poverty rates between children in immigrant families and children in native-born families. The brief reports results for the official poverty measure, but also for two alternatives to the official measure. Most notably, the official poverty measure does not explicitly take into account what families need to spend for housing, food, and other necessities; transportation for work; child care/early education; income and payroll taxes; and differences in the cost of living across geographic areas of the country. We calculated a new “baseline basic budget poverty” measure that takes into account the costs of housing, food, other necessities, transportation for work, and federal income/payroll taxes. We calculated a second new measure—which might be termed “baseline basic budget poverty plus”—that also takes into account the costs for formal child care and early education. Our calculations show that when the new Baseline Basic Budget Poverty measure for children is used, the rate of poverty is much higher than that suggested by the official measure. Moreover, children in immigrant families tend to live in states showing large gaps in the two measures and these gaps widen further when the costs for child care and early education are taken into account. These results also suggest that policies and programs to combat childhood poverty, to be truly effective, should consider the full range of costs that strain family budgets. Taking this approach could especially benefit immigrant children, who are more likely to experience poverty than are their native-born peers.","PeriodicalId":437495,"journal":{"name":"Child Trends","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Children in Immigrant Families--The U.S. and 50 States: Economic Need beyond the Official Poverty Measure. Research Brief Series. Publication #2009-19.\",\"authors\":\"D. J. Hernandez, N. Denton, S. Macartney\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/e538212009-001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Few would deny that reducing child poverty is a worthy goal for this nation, or any nation. Far less agreement exists about the best way to measure poverty. Increasingly, though, informed voices have raised questions about the adequacy of the official U.S. poverty measure. This Research Brief , the second in our series on immigrant children, draws on new results from Census 2000 data to examine differences in the poverty rates between children in immigrant families and children in native-born families. The brief reports results for the official poverty measure, but also for two alternatives to the official measure. Most notably, the official poverty measure does not explicitly take into account what families need to spend for housing, food, and other necessities; transportation for work; child care/early education; income and payroll taxes; and differences in the cost of living across geographic areas of the country. We calculated a new “baseline basic budget poverty” measure that takes into account the costs of housing, food, other necessities, transportation for work, and federal income/payroll taxes. We calculated a second new measure—which might be termed “baseline basic budget poverty plus”—that also takes into account the costs for formal child care and early education. Our calculations show that when the new Baseline Basic Budget Poverty measure for children is used, the rate of poverty is much higher than that suggested by the official measure. Moreover, children in immigrant families tend to live in states showing large gaps in the two measures and these gaps widen further when the costs for child care and early education are taken into account. These results also suggest that policies and programs to combat childhood poverty, to be truly effective, should consider the full range of costs that strain family budgets. Taking this approach could especially benefit immigrant children, who are more likely to experience poverty than are their native-born peers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":437495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Trends\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Trends\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/e538212009-001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e538212009-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

很少有人会否认,减少儿童贫困是美国乃至任何国家值得追求的目标。对于衡量贫困的最佳方式,人们的共识要少得多。不过,越来越多消息灵通的声音对美国官方贫困衡量标准的充分性提出了质疑。这篇研究简报是我们关于移民儿童系列的第二篇,它利用2000年人口普查数据的新结果来研究移民家庭儿童和本土出生家庭儿童之间的贫困率差异。简要报告了官方贫困衡量标准的结果,以及官方衡量标准的两种替代方案的结果。最值得注意的是,官方的贫困衡量标准没有明确考虑到家庭需要在住房、食品和其他必需品上花费多少;工作交通;幼儿保育/早期教育;所得税和工资税;以及该国不同地理区域的生活成本差异。我们计算了一个新的“基线基本预算贫困”指标,该指标考虑了住房、食品、其他必需品、工作交通和联邦收入/工资税的成本。我们计算了第二个新指标——可能被称为“基线基本预算贫困加”——它也考虑了正规儿童保育和早期教育的成本。我们的计算表明,当使用新的儿童基线基本预算贫困指标时,贫困率远高于官方指标所显示的贫困率。此外,移民家庭的孩子往往生活在两项指标存在较大差距的州,如果考虑到儿童保育和早期教育的成本,这些差距会进一步扩大。这些结果还表明,对抗儿童贫困的政策和项目要想真正有效,就应该全面考虑导致家庭预算紧张的各种成本。采取这种方法尤其有利于移民儿童,他们比本土出生的同龄人更有可能经历贫困。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Children in Immigrant Families--The U.S. and 50 States: Economic Need beyond the Official Poverty Measure. Research Brief Series. Publication #2009-19.
Few would deny that reducing child poverty is a worthy goal for this nation, or any nation. Far less agreement exists about the best way to measure poverty. Increasingly, though, informed voices have raised questions about the adequacy of the official U.S. poverty measure. This Research Brief , the second in our series on immigrant children, draws on new results from Census 2000 data to examine differences in the poverty rates between children in immigrant families and children in native-born families. The brief reports results for the official poverty measure, but also for two alternatives to the official measure. Most notably, the official poverty measure does not explicitly take into account what families need to spend for housing, food, and other necessities; transportation for work; child care/early education; income and payroll taxes; and differences in the cost of living across geographic areas of the country. We calculated a new “baseline basic budget poverty” measure that takes into account the costs of housing, food, other necessities, transportation for work, and federal income/payroll taxes. We calculated a second new measure—which might be termed “baseline basic budget poverty plus”—that also takes into account the costs for formal child care and early education. Our calculations show that when the new Baseline Basic Budget Poverty measure for children is used, the rate of poverty is much higher than that suggested by the official measure. Moreover, children in immigrant families tend to live in states showing large gaps in the two measures and these gaps widen further when the costs for child care and early education are taken into account. These results also suggest that policies and programs to combat childhood poverty, to be truly effective, should consider the full range of costs that strain family budgets. Taking this approach could especially benefit immigrant children, who are more likely to experience poverty than are their native-born peers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信