{"title":"虚假交易,第一部分:国际会计准则对特殊目的实体合并的法律问题","authors":"D. Gololobov, Joseph Tanega","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2706253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is part one of a two part series that explores the difficulties that accountancy professional bodies have in attempting to find standard workable definitions of consolidation in the face of the use and abuse of special purpose vehicles. The questions of legitimacy and legality of corporate form are examined in light of recent history of accountancy reform. The authors propose an \"anti-sham principle\" to help coordinate and effect a benchmark across disperse views on the legitimacy of manipulative valuation and off-balance sheet structures.","PeriodicalId":123337,"journal":{"name":"History of Accounting eJournal","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sham Spes, Part I: The Legal Issues of International Accounting Standards on the Consolidation of Special Purpose Entities\",\"authors\":\"D. Gololobov, Joseph Tanega\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2706253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is part one of a two part series that explores the difficulties that accountancy professional bodies have in attempting to find standard workable definitions of consolidation in the face of the use and abuse of special purpose vehicles. The questions of legitimacy and legality of corporate form are examined in light of recent history of accountancy reform. The authors propose an \\\"anti-sham principle\\\" to help coordinate and effect a benchmark across disperse views on the legitimacy of manipulative valuation and off-balance sheet structures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Accounting eJournal\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Accounting eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2706253\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Accounting eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2706253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sham Spes, Part I: The Legal Issues of International Accounting Standards on the Consolidation of Special Purpose Entities
The article is part one of a two part series that explores the difficulties that accountancy professional bodies have in attempting to find standard workable definitions of consolidation in the face of the use and abuse of special purpose vehicles. The questions of legitimacy and legality of corporate form are examined in light of recent history of accountancy reform. The authors propose an "anti-sham principle" to help coordinate and effect a benchmark across disperse views on the legitimacy of manipulative valuation and off-balance sheet structures.