对长期活动进行分类的定期快速测试

Pekka Siirtola, Heli Koskimäki, J. Röning
{"title":"对长期活动进行分类的定期快速测试","authors":"Pekka Siirtola, Heli Koskimäki, J. Röning","doi":"10.1109/CIDM.2011.5949426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A novel method to classify long-term human activities is presented in this study. The method consists of two parts: quick test and periodic classification. The quick test uses temporal information to improve recognition accuracy, while the periodic classification is based on the assumption that recognized activities are long-term. Periodic quick test (PQT) classification was tested using a data set consisting of six long-term sports exercises. The data were collected from six persons wearing a two-dimensional accelerometer on their wrist. The results show that the presented method is not only faster than a normal method, that does not use temporal information and does not assume that activities are long-term, but also more accurate. The results were compared with a normal sliding window technique which divides signal into smaller sequences and classifies each sequence into one of the six classes. The classification accuracy using a normal method was around 84% while using PQT the recognition rate was over 90%. In addition, the number of classified sequences using a normal method was over six times higher than using PQT.","PeriodicalId":211565,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM)","volume":"220 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Periodic quick test for classifying long-term activities\",\"authors\":\"Pekka Siirtola, Heli Koskimäki, J. Röning\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CIDM.2011.5949426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A novel method to classify long-term human activities is presented in this study. The method consists of two parts: quick test and periodic classification. The quick test uses temporal information to improve recognition accuracy, while the periodic classification is based on the assumption that recognized activities are long-term. Periodic quick test (PQT) classification was tested using a data set consisting of six long-term sports exercises. The data were collected from six persons wearing a two-dimensional accelerometer on their wrist. The results show that the presented method is not only faster than a normal method, that does not use temporal information and does not assume that activities are long-term, but also more accurate. The results were compared with a normal sliding window technique which divides signal into smaller sequences and classifies each sequence into one of the six classes. The classification accuracy using a normal method was around 84% while using PQT the recognition rate was over 90%. In addition, the number of classified sequences using a normal method was over six times higher than using PQT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":211565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM)\",\"volume\":\"220 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIDM.2011.5949426\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIDM.2011.5949426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

提出了一种新的人类长期活动分类方法。该方法由快速检测和周期性分类两部分组成。快速测试使用时间信息来提高识别精度,而周期性分类是基于识别活动是长期的假设。定期快速测试(PQT)分类测试使用的数据集包括六个长期运动。这些数据是从六个人身上收集的,他们的手腕上戴着一个二维加速度计。结果表明,该方法不仅比常规方法更快,不使用时间信息,不假设活动是长期的,而且更准确。结果与常规滑动窗口技术进行了比较,该技术将信号分成更小的序列,并将每个序列分为六个类之一。常规方法的分类准确率在84%左右,而PQT方法的识别率在90%以上。此外,使用正常方法分类序列的数量比使用PQT高出6倍以上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Periodic quick test for classifying long-term activities
A novel method to classify long-term human activities is presented in this study. The method consists of two parts: quick test and periodic classification. The quick test uses temporal information to improve recognition accuracy, while the periodic classification is based on the assumption that recognized activities are long-term. Periodic quick test (PQT) classification was tested using a data set consisting of six long-term sports exercises. The data were collected from six persons wearing a two-dimensional accelerometer on their wrist. The results show that the presented method is not only faster than a normal method, that does not use temporal information and does not assume that activities are long-term, but also more accurate. The results were compared with a normal sliding window technique which divides signal into smaller sequences and classifies each sequence into one of the six classes. The classification accuracy using a normal method was around 84% while using PQT the recognition rate was over 90%. In addition, the number of classified sequences using a normal method was over six times higher than using PQT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信