Matthew T. Chang, J. Greivenkamp, A. Lindquist, Tim M. Rich
{"title":"地下损伤:自动测量和视觉测量的比较","authors":"Matthew T. Chang, J. Greivenkamp, A. Lindquist, Tim M. Rich","doi":"10.1364/oft.1994.omd4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An automated PC-based machine vision system has been developed for measuring subsurface damage in glass based on the ball dimpling method [1,2]. The software automatically processes an image of the dimple and returns the SSD value. This paper provides a preliminary comparison of the result from this system and the result obtained by conventional visual measurements.","PeriodicalId":142307,"journal":{"name":"Optical Fabrication and Testing Workshop","volume":"08 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subsurface Damage: Comparison of Automated and Visual Measurements\",\"authors\":\"Matthew T. Chang, J. Greivenkamp, A. Lindquist, Tim M. Rich\",\"doi\":\"10.1364/oft.1994.omd4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An automated PC-based machine vision system has been developed for measuring subsurface damage in glass based on the ball dimpling method [1,2]. The software automatically processes an image of the dimple and returns the SSD value. This paper provides a preliminary comparison of the result from this system and the result obtained by conventional visual measurements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Optical Fabrication and Testing Workshop\",\"volume\":\"08 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Optical Fabrication and Testing Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1364/oft.1994.omd4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optical Fabrication and Testing Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1364/oft.1994.omd4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Subsurface Damage: Comparison of Automated and Visual Measurements
An automated PC-based machine vision system has been developed for measuring subsurface damage in glass based on the ball dimpling method [1,2]. The software automatically processes an image of the dimple and returns the SSD value. This paper provides a preliminary comparison of the result from this system and the result obtained by conventional visual measurements.