Schrödinger的货币:虚拟货币如何使RIC和REIT资格要求复杂化

Laura Davidson Pond
{"title":"Schrödinger的货币:虚拟货币如何使RIC和REIT资格要求复杂化","authors":"Laura Davidson Pond","doi":"10.7916/D8KD3DXN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bitcoin and other virtual currencies have created new opportunities for individuals to invest in a rapidly appreciating new asset class, but the Internal Revenue Code has been unable to keep pace with this new technology. Because the Code does not suitably define what a virtual currency is in the contexts of Regulated Investment Companies (RICs) or Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), the concepts of “good” income and “good” assets in I.R.C. §§ 851 (RICs) and 856 (REITs) are inapplicable to virtual currency. Under the current regime, a RIC or a REIT may not be able to invest directly in virtual currency without compromising the investment entity’s qualification as a tax-favorable pass-through entity. The legislative purposes behind Sections 851 and 856 suggest that digital currency possesses the characteristics of “good” income and “good” assets. Accordingly, RICs and REITs should be able to invest in this potentially lucrative new technology without risking disqualification as a tax-favored entity because virtual currency could constitute a “security” for the purposes of Sections 851 and 856. Yet the Code’s RIC and REIT rules require that any qualifying security be registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Virtual currency is not yet regulated under the 1940 Act, and thus cannot qualify as a security for the purposes of the RIC and REIT “good” income and “good” asset tests. The inability of the Code and the ’40 Act to adapt to new technology makes virtual currency a nonviable investment for RICs and REITs, but even more so, renders the unyielding nexus between the ‘40 Act and Code Sections 851 and 856 nonsensical. The I.R.C. must somehow provide for the possibility of RIC or REIT investment in a non1940 Act security, while avoiding the significant non-tax consequences attendant with a sweeping classification of all virtual currency as securities. The Investment Company Act of 1940 should supplement—not comprise—the tax rules that define the kinds of income and assets that allow an entity to qualify as a RIC or a REIT. *Columbia Law School, J.D. Candidate 2018. Many thanks to Professor Willard Taylor for his advice and expertise, as well as Aaron Josephson, Jisoo Han, Zhiyuan Zuo, and the editorial staff of the Columbia Journal of Tax Law. 230 COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF TAX LAW [Vol.9:229","PeriodicalId":368484,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Journal of Tax Law","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Schrödinger’s Currency: How Virtual Currencies Complicate the RIC and REIT Qualification Requirements\",\"authors\":\"Laura Davidson Pond\",\"doi\":\"10.7916/D8KD3DXN\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bitcoin and other virtual currencies have created new opportunities for individuals to invest in a rapidly appreciating new asset class, but the Internal Revenue Code has been unable to keep pace with this new technology. Because the Code does not suitably define what a virtual currency is in the contexts of Regulated Investment Companies (RICs) or Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), the concepts of “good” income and “good” assets in I.R.C. §§ 851 (RICs) and 856 (REITs) are inapplicable to virtual currency. Under the current regime, a RIC or a REIT may not be able to invest directly in virtual currency without compromising the investment entity’s qualification as a tax-favorable pass-through entity. The legislative purposes behind Sections 851 and 856 suggest that digital currency possesses the characteristics of “good” income and “good” assets. Accordingly, RICs and REITs should be able to invest in this potentially lucrative new technology without risking disqualification as a tax-favored entity because virtual currency could constitute a “security” for the purposes of Sections 851 and 856. Yet the Code’s RIC and REIT rules require that any qualifying security be registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Virtual currency is not yet regulated under the 1940 Act, and thus cannot qualify as a security for the purposes of the RIC and REIT “good” income and “good” asset tests. The inability of the Code and the ’40 Act to adapt to new technology makes virtual currency a nonviable investment for RICs and REITs, but even more so, renders the unyielding nexus between the ‘40 Act and Code Sections 851 and 856 nonsensical. The I.R.C. must somehow provide for the possibility of RIC or REIT investment in a non1940 Act security, while avoiding the significant non-tax consequences attendant with a sweeping classification of all virtual currency as securities. The Investment Company Act of 1940 should supplement—not comprise—the tax rules that define the kinds of income and assets that allow an entity to qualify as a RIC or a REIT. *Columbia Law School, J.D. Candidate 2018. Many thanks to Professor Willard Taylor for his advice and expertise, as well as Aaron Josephson, Jisoo Han, Zhiyuan Zuo, and the editorial staff of the Columbia Journal of Tax Law. 230 COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF TAX LAW [Vol.9:229\",\"PeriodicalId\":368484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Columbia Journal of Tax Law\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Columbia Journal of Tax Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8KD3DXN\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia Journal of Tax Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8KD3DXN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比特币和其他虚拟货币为个人投资一种快速升值的新资产类别创造了新的机会,但美国《国内税收法》(Internal Revenue Code)未能跟上这种新技术的步伐。由于该准则没有适当地定义受监管投资公司(RICs)或房地产投资信托基金(REITs)背景下的虚拟货币,因此I.R.C.§§851 (RICs)和856 (REITs)中“良好”收入和“良好”资产的概念不适用于虚拟货币。在现行制度下,RIC或REIT可能无法在不影响投资实体作为税收优惠传递实体的资格的情况下直接投资虚拟货币。第851条和第856条背后的立法目的表明,数字货币具有“良好”收入和“良好”资产的特征。因此,RICs和REITs应该能够投资于这种潜在利润丰厚的新技术,而不会冒着被取消作为税收优惠实体资格的风险,因为虚拟货币可能构成第851和856条规定的“证券”。然而,该法典的RIC和REIT规则要求任何符合条件的证券都必须根据1940年的《投资公司法》进行注册。虚拟货币尚未受到1940年法案的监管,因此无法作为RIC和REIT“良好”收入和“良好”资产测试目的的证券。《法典》和《40法案》无法适应新技术,这使得虚拟货币成为RICs和REITs的不可行的投资,但更重要的是,《40法案》和《法典》第851和856条之间的顽固联系变得毫无意义。I.R.C.必须以某种方式提供RIC或REIT投资于非1940年法案证券的可能性,同时避免将所有虚拟货币全面归类为证券所带来的重大非税后果。1940年的《投资公司法》(Investment Company Act)应该补充——而不是包括——定义收入和资产种类的税收规则,这些收入和资产允许实体有资格成为RIC或REIT。*哥伦比亚大学法学院,2018年法学博士候选人。非常感谢Willard Taylor教授的建议和专业知识,以及Aaron Josephson, Jisoo Han, Zhiyuan Zuo和《哥伦比亚税法杂志》的编辑人员
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Schrödinger’s Currency: How Virtual Currencies Complicate the RIC and REIT Qualification Requirements
Bitcoin and other virtual currencies have created new opportunities for individuals to invest in a rapidly appreciating new asset class, but the Internal Revenue Code has been unable to keep pace with this new technology. Because the Code does not suitably define what a virtual currency is in the contexts of Regulated Investment Companies (RICs) or Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), the concepts of “good” income and “good” assets in I.R.C. §§ 851 (RICs) and 856 (REITs) are inapplicable to virtual currency. Under the current regime, a RIC or a REIT may not be able to invest directly in virtual currency without compromising the investment entity’s qualification as a tax-favorable pass-through entity. The legislative purposes behind Sections 851 and 856 suggest that digital currency possesses the characteristics of “good” income and “good” assets. Accordingly, RICs and REITs should be able to invest in this potentially lucrative new technology without risking disqualification as a tax-favored entity because virtual currency could constitute a “security” for the purposes of Sections 851 and 856. Yet the Code’s RIC and REIT rules require that any qualifying security be registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Virtual currency is not yet regulated under the 1940 Act, and thus cannot qualify as a security for the purposes of the RIC and REIT “good” income and “good” asset tests. The inability of the Code and the ’40 Act to adapt to new technology makes virtual currency a nonviable investment for RICs and REITs, but even more so, renders the unyielding nexus between the ‘40 Act and Code Sections 851 and 856 nonsensical. The I.R.C. must somehow provide for the possibility of RIC or REIT investment in a non1940 Act security, while avoiding the significant non-tax consequences attendant with a sweeping classification of all virtual currency as securities. The Investment Company Act of 1940 should supplement—not comprise—the tax rules that define the kinds of income and assets that allow an entity to qualify as a RIC or a REIT. *Columbia Law School, J.D. Candidate 2018. Many thanks to Professor Willard Taylor for his advice and expertise, as well as Aaron Josephson, Jisoo Han, Zhiyuan Zuo, and the editorial staff of the Columbia Journal of Tax Law. 230 COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF TAX LAW [Vol.9:229
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信