结论:通过地方资产改善公共政策

{"title":"结论:通过地方资产改善公共政策","authors":"","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781447348078.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The final chapter reflects on what we have learned from looking across the ten case studies of the use of local knowledge in policy processes. It reflects on the importance of the use of multiple forms of knowledge or the co-production of knowledge, particularly in a diverse and decentralised country such as Indonesia. It also reflects on the strategies that have been used in bringing local knowledge to policies, and the importance of treating local knowledge as an asset rather than a liability. It identifies the tensions that must be managed in bringing multiple forms of evidence and their diverse values and origins. The new role of ‘experts’ is discussed, to support communities to understand policy options, and to provide a level playing field and opportunities for deliberative democracy more generally. Finally, the chapter reflects on ways that local knowledge can enrich public policy in an era of post-truth politics.","PeriodicalId":385375,"journal":{"name":"Local Knowledge Matters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conclusion: improving public policy through local assets\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/policypress/9781447348078.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The final chapter reflects on what we have learned from looking across the ten case studies of the use of local knowledge in policy processes. It reflects on the importance of the use of multiple forms of knowledge or the co-production of knowledge, particularly in a diverse and decentralised country such as Indonesia. It also reflects on the strategies that have been used in bringing local knowledge to policies, and the importance of treating local knowledge as an asset rather than a liability. It identifies the tensions that must be managed in bringing multiple forms of evidence and their diverse values and origins. The new role of ‘experts’ is discussed, to support communities to understand policy options, and to provide a level playing field and opportunities for deliberative democracy more generally. Finally, the chapter reflects on ways that local knowledge can enrich public policy in an era of post-truth politics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Local Knowledge Matters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Local Knowledge Matters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447348078.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local Knowledge Matters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447348078.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最后一章反映了我们从在政策过程中使用当地知识的十个案例研究中学到的东西。它反映了利用多种形式的知识或共同生产知识的重要性,特别是在印度尼西亚这样一个多样化和分散化的国家。它还反映了在将地方知识纳入政策方面所采用的战略,以及将地方知识视为资产而不是负债的重要性。它确定了在提供多种形式的证据及其不同的价值和来源时必须加以管理的紧张关系。讨论了“专家”的新作用,以支持社区了解政策选择,并为更普遍的协商民主提供公平的竞争环境和机会。最后,本章反思了地方知识在后真相政治时代丰富公共政策的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conclusion: improving public policy through local assets
The final chapter reflects on what we have learned from looking across the ten case studies of the use of local knowledge in policy processes. It reflects on the importance of the use of multiple forms of knowledge or the co-production of knowledge, particularly in a diverse and decentralised country such as Indonesia. It also reflects on the strategies that have been used in bringing local knowledge to policies, and the importance of treating local knowledge as an asset rather than a liability. It identifies the tensions that must be managed in bringing multiple forms of evidence and their diverse values and origins. The new role of ‘experts’ is discussed, to support communities to understand policy options, and to provide a level playing field and opportunities for deliberative democracy more generally. Finally, the chapter reflects on ways that local knowledge can enrich public policy in an era of post-truth politics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信