后毛时代中国的思想与组织

Lowell Dittmer
{"title":"后毛时代中国的思想与组织","authors":"Lowell Dittmer","doi":"10.2307/2644071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the outset of the Cultural Revolution, there was a tendency in some quarters to conclude that all previous conceptualizations of the Chinese Communist political system were flawed, either because they had failed to predict this momentous upheaval or because the People's Republic of China (PRC) by 1966 had so radically departed from its previous incarnation. Inasmuch as the Chinese themselves have come to characterize the entire decade as a deviation from the historical tradition from which they now seek to derive their current state of affairs, these pre-1966 formulations may once again be perceived to have explanatory utility, while conceptualizations based on the Cultural Revolution fade into irrelevance-if, that is, the current leadership has succeeded in recapturing the past. The purpose of this article is to relate post-Mao macropolitical developments to one of the more influential conceptualizations of the pre1966 system, Franz Schurmann's discussion of the relationship between ideology and organization. ' Schurmann's work has drawn telling criticism as well as praise,2 and an essay in diachronic comparison of this sort need not assume it to be a fully satisfactory theoretical formulation.3 I do,","PeriodicalId":115040,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Development in Mainland China","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ideology and Organization in Post-Mao China\",\"authors\":\"Lowell Dittmer\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/2644071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At the outset of the Cultural Revolution, there was a tendency in some quarters to conclude that all previous conceptualizations of the Chinese Communist political system were flawed, either because they had failed to predict this momentous upheaval or because the People's Republic of China (PRC) by 1966 had so radically departed from its previous incarnation. Inasmuch as the Chinese themselves have come to characterize the entire decade as a deviation from the historical tradition from which they now seek to derive their current state of affairs, these pre-1966 formulations may once again be perceived to have explanatory utility, while conceptualizations based on the Cultural Revolution fade into irrelevance-if, that is, the current leadership has succeeded in recapturing the past. The purpose of this article is to relate post-Mao macropolitical developments to one of the more influential conceptualizations of the pre1966 system, Franz Schurmann's discussion of the relationship between ideology and organization. ' Schurmann's work has drawn telling criticism as well as praise,2 and an essay in diachronic comparison of this sort need not assume it to be a fully satisfactory theoretical formulation.3 I do,\",\"PeriodicalId\":115040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on Development in Mainland China\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on Development in Mainland China\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/2644071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Development in Mainland China","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2644071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在文革开始的时候,有些人倾向于认为以前所有关于中国共产主义政治制度的概念都是有缺陷的,要么是因为他们没有预测到这场重大的动荡,要么是因为中华人民共和国(PRC)在1966年已经与以前的形象彻底不同了。由于中国人自己已经开始将整个十年描述为对历史传统的偏离,他们现在试图从中得出他们目前的事态,这些1966年之前的公式可能再次被认为具有解释效用,而基于文化大革命的概念化则变得无关紧要——如果,也就是说,当前的领导层成功地重新夺回了过去。本文的目的是将后毛时代的宏观政治发展与1966年以前体制的一个更有影响力的概念联系起来,即Franz Schurmann关于意识形态与组织之间关系的讨论。Schurmann的工作在受到赞扬的同时也受到了批评,而这类历时比较的文章不必假定它是一个完全令人满意的理论表述我做的,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ideology and Organization in Post-Mao China
At the outset of the Cultural Revolution, there was a tendency in some quarters to conclude that all previous conceptualizations of the Chinese Communist political system were flawed, either because they had failed to predict this momentous upheaval or because the People's Republic of China (PRC) by 1966 had so radically departed from its previous incarnation. Inasmuch as the Chinese themselves have come to characterize the entire decade as a deviation from the historical tradition from which they now seek to derive their current state of affairs, these pre-1966 formulations may once again be perceived to have explanatory utility, while conceptualizations based on the Cultural Revolution fade into irrelevance-if, that is, the current leadership has succeeded in recapturing the past. The purpose of this article is to relate post-Mao macropolitical developments to one of the more influential conceptualizations of the pre1966 system, Franz Schurmann's discussion of the relationship between ideology and organization. ' Schurmann's work has drawn telling criticism as well as praise,2 and an essay in diachronic comparison of this sort need not assume it to be a fully satisfactory theoretical formulation.3 I do,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信